Effect of cryoablation in Nuss bar placement on opioid utilization and length of stay.

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Christopher Clinker, Jack Scaife, Davian Martinez, Anastasia M Kahan, R Scott Eldredge, Katie W Russell
{"title":"Effect of cryoablation in Nuss bar placement on opioid utilization and length of stay.","authors":"Christopher Clinker, Jack Scaife, Davian Martinez, Anastasia M Kahan, R Scott Eldredge, Katie W Russell","doi":"10.1007/s00383-024-05838-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Our institution recently transitioned from paravertebral nerve blocks (PVBs) to intercostal nerve cryoablation (INC) for pain control following minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum (MIRPE). This study aimed to determine how INC affected the operative time, length of stay, complication rates, inpatient opioid use, and outpatient prescription of opioids at a single center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was performed at a single pediatric referral center of all patients who underwent MIRPE between 2018 and 2023. Patient demographics, operative details, and perioperative course were collected. The use of INC versus PVB was recorded. Univariate analyses were performed using Wilcoxon rank sum tests for continuous variables and chi-squared tests for categorical variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>255 patients were included with a median age of 15 years, median BMI of 18.50 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, and median Haller index of 4.40. INC was utilized in 41% (105/255), and 59% (150/255) received PVB. The two groups did not differ significantly in BMI, Haller index, or complications, though the INC patients were older by 1 year (15.0 vs. 16.0, p = 0.034). INC was associated with an increased operative time (INC: 92 min vs. PVB: 67 min, p < 0.001), decreased length of stay (3 vs. 4 days, p =  < 0.001), more than twofold decrease in inpatient opioids per day (INC: 16 MME vs. PVB: 41 MME, p < 0.001), and a fourfold decrease in the amount of opioids prescribed at discharge (INC: 90 MME vs. PVB: 390 MME, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>INC after MIRPE significantly decreased both the inpatient opioid utilization and our outpatient prescribing practices while also decreasing our overall length of stay without increasing complications.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":19832,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Surgery International","volume":"40 1","pages":"260"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Surgery International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-024-05838-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Our institution recently transitioned from paravertebral nerve blocks (PVBs) to intercostal nerve cryoablation (INC) for pain control following minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum (MIRPE). This study aimed to determine how INC affected the operative time, length of stay, complication rates, inpatient opioid use, and outpatient prescription of opioids at a single center.

Methods: A retrospective review was performed at a single pediatric referral center of all patients who underwent MIRPE between 2018 and 2023. Patient demographics, operative details, and perioperative course were collected. The use of INC versus PVB was recorded. Univariate analyses were performed using Wilcoxon rank sum tests for continuous variables and chi-squared tests for categorical variables.

Results: 255 patients were included with a median age of 15 years, median BMI of 18.50 kg/m2, and median Haller index of 4.40. INC was utilized in 41% (105/255), and 59% (150/255) received PVB. The two groups did not differ significantly in BMI, Haller index, or complications, though the INC patients were older by 1 year (15.0 vs. 16.0, p = 0.034). INC was associated with an increased operative time (INC: 92 min vs. PVB: 67 min, p < 0.001), decreased length of stay (3 vs. 4 days, p =  < 0.001), more than twofold decrease in inpatient opioids per day (INC: 16 MME vs. PVB: 41 MME, p < 0.001), and a fourfold decrease in the amount of opioids prescribed at discharge (INC: 90 MME vs. PVB: 390 MME, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: INC after MIRPE significantly decreased both the inpatient opioid utilization and our outpatient prescribing practices while also decreasing our overall length of stay without increasing complications.

Level of evidence: Level III.

冷冻消融术在努斯杆置入术中对阿片类药物使用和住院时间的影响。
背景:我院最近从椎旁神经阻滞术(PVB)过渡到了肋间神经低温消融术(INC),用于微创修复开胸手术(MIRPE)后的疼痛控制。本研究旨在确定 INC 如何影响一个中心的手术时间、住院时间、并发症发生率、住院患者阿片类药物的使用以及门诊患者阿片类药物的处方:一家儿科转诊中心对 2018 年至 2023 年期间接受 MIRPE 的所有患者进行了回顾性审查。收集了患者的人口统计学资料、手术细节和围手术期过程。记录了 INC 与 PVB 的使用情况。使用Wilcoxon秩和检验对连续变量进行单变量分析,使用秩方检验对分类变量进行单变量分析。结果:共纳入255名患者,中位年龄为15岁,中位BMI为18.50 kg/m2,中位Haller指数为4.40。41%的患者(105/255)使用了 INC,59%的患者(150/255)接受了 PVB。两组患者在体重指数、霍勒指数或并发症方面无明显差异,但 INC 患者的年龄比 PVB 患者大 1 岁(15.0 对 16.0,P = 0.034)。INC 与手术时间延长有关(INC:92 分钟对 PVB:67 分钟,P=0.034):MIRPE 后的 INC 大幅减少了住院患者的阿片类药物使用量和门诊处方,同时也缩短了总住院时间,而不会增加并发症:证据等级:III 级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
215
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Surgery International is a journal devoted to the publication of new and important information from the entire spectrum of pediatric surgery. The major purpose of the journal is to promote postgraduate training and further education in the surgery of infants and children. The contents will include articles in clinical and experimental surgery, as well as related fields. One section of each issue is devoted to a special topic, with invited contributions from recognized authorities. Other sections will include: -Review articles- Original articles- Technical innovations- Letters to the editor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信