Efficacy and Safety of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in First-Line Treatment and at Relapse in Elderly Patients with Multiple Myeloma.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Oncology Pub Date : 2024-10-03 DOI:10.1159/000541541
Eva-Maria Klein, Sejla Hujic, Kaya Miah, Axel Benner, Maximilian Merz, Uta Bertsch, Niels Weinhold, Hartmut Goldschmidt, Sandra Sauer
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in First-Line Treatment and at Relapse in Elderly Patients with Multiple Myeloma.","authors":"Eva-Maria Klein, Sejla Hujic, Kaya Miah, Axel Benner, Maximilian Merz, Uta Bertsch, Niels Weinhold, Hartmut Goldschmidt, Sandra Sauer","doi":"10.1159/000541541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although recent data suggest that melphalan high-dose therapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (HDT/ASCT) is safe and effective in eligible multiple myeloma (MM) patients up to the age of 75 years, its value in elderly MM patients is still controversially discussed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 607 MM patients ≥60 years old, who were admitted to our institution for first-line or salvage HDT/ASCT between January 2007 and October 2018. We assigned them to three groups according to age at HDT/ASCT: 60-64 years (S1), 65-69 years (S2) and ≥70 years (S3). We compared progression-free and overall survival, duration of hospitalization, complications, transfers to intermediate or intensive care unit, readmissions after discharge and deaths within 100 days after HDT/ASCT between these groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Age did not impact progression-free and overall survival after first-line and salvage HDT/ASCT. Patients ≥70 years old at first HDT/ASCT had a longer hospitalization compared to patients 60-64 years old; however, the difference in the length of hospitalization was only marginal. Rates of febrile neutropenia, mucositis, transfers to intermediate or intensive care unit, readmissions after discharge, and deaths within 100 days after HDT/ASCT were similar in the 3 age groups of patients receiving first or salvage HDT/ASCT. Patients with a Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥2 receiving first HDT/ASCT had a higher risk for a transfer to intermediate or intensive care unit.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our analysis shows that HDT/ASCT is safe and effective in eligible elderly MM patients in first-line treatment and at relapse. A careful patient selection according to biological rather than chronological age is of crucial importance.</p>","PeriodicalId":19497,"journal":{"name":"Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000541541","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Although recent data suggest that melphalan high-dose therapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (HDT/ASCT) is safe and effective in eligible multiple myeloma (MM) patients up to the age of 75 years, its value in elderly MM patients is still controversially discussed.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 607 MM patients ≥60 years old, who were admitted to our institution for first-line or salvage HDT/ASCT between January 2007 and October 2018. We assigned them to three groups according to age at HDT/ASCT: 60-64 years (S1), 65-69 years (S2) and ≥70 years (S3). We compared progression-free and overall survival, duration of hospitalization, complications, transfers to intermediate or intensive care unit, readmissions after discharge and deaths within 100 days after HDT/ASCT between these groups.

Results: Age did not impact progression-free and overall survival after first-line and salvage HDT/ASCT. Patients ≥70 years old at first HDT/ASCT had a longer hospitalization compared to patients 60-64 years old; however, the difference in the length of hospitalization was only marginal. Rates of febrile neutropenia, mucositis, transfers to intermediate or intensive care unit, readmissions after discharge, and deaths within 100 days after HDT/ASCT were similar in the 3 age groups of patients receiving first or salvage HDT/ASCT. Patients with a Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥2 receiving first HDT/ASCT had a higher risk for a transfer to intermediate or intensive care unit.

Conclusion: Our analysis shows that HDT/ASCT is safe and effective in eligible elderly MM patients in first-line treatment and at relapse. A careful patient selection according to biological rather than chronological age is of crucial importance.

多发性骨髓瘤老年患者一线治疗和复发时进行自体干细胞移植的有效性和安全性。
导言 尽管最近的数据表明,美法仑大剂量治疗后进行自体干细胞移植(HDT/ASCT)对符合条件的 75 岁以下多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者是安全有效的,但其对老年 MM 患者的价值仍存在争议。方法 我们回顾性分析了 2007 年 1 月至 2018 年 10 月期间在我院接受一线或挽救性 HDT/ASCT 治疗的 607 名年龄≥60 岁的 MM 患者。我们根据HDT/ASCT时的年龄将他们分为三组:60-64岁(S1)、65-69岁(S2)和≥70岁(S3)。我们比较了这些组别之间的无进展生存期和总生存期、住院时间、并发症、转入中级或重症监护病房、出院后再次入院以及 HDT/ASCT 后 100 天内的死亡情况。结果 年龄对一线和挽救性HDT/ASCT后的无进展生存期和总生存期没有影响。与60-64岁的患者相比,首次接受HDT/ASCT时年龄≥70岁的患者住院时间更长,但住院时间的差异微乎其微。接受首次或挽救性 HDT/ASCT 的三个年龄组患者的发热性中性粒细胞减少症、粘膜炎、转入中级或重症监护病房、出院后再次入院以及 HDT/ASCT 后 100 天内死亡的比率相似。首次接受 HDT/ASCT 的夏尔森综合指数≥ 2 的患者转入中级或重症监护病房的风险较高。结论 我们的分析表明,对于符合条件的一线治疗和复发的老年 MM 患者,HDT/ASCT 是安全有效的。根据患者的生理年龄而非实际年龄对其进行慎重选择至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oncology
Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
76
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Although laboratory and clinical cancer research need to be closely linked, observations at the basic level often remain removed from medical applications. This journal works to accelerate the translation of experimental results into the clinic, and back again into the laboratory for further investigation. The fundamental purpose of this effort is to advance clinically-relevant knowledge of cancer, and improve the outcome of prevention, diagnosis and treatment of malignant disease. The journal publishes significant clinical studies from cancer programs around the world, along with important translational laboratory findings, mini-reviews (invited and submitted) and in-depth discussions of evolving and controversial topics in the oncology arena. A unique feature of the journal is a new section which focuses on rapid peer-review and subsequent publication of short reports of phase 1 and phase 2 clinical cancer trials, with a goal of insuring that high-quality clinical cancer research quickly enters the public domain, regardless of the trial’s ultimate conclusions regarding efficacy or toxicity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信