Thomas Ternisien, Florian Azoulay, Mohammad Y Bangash, Marie-Claude Blais
{"title":"Identification of feline erythrocyte antigen 6 and lack of alloimmunization to feline erythrocyte antigen 4 in cats.","authors":"Thomas Ternisien, Florian Azoulay, Mohammad Y Bangash, Marie-Claude Blais","doi":"10.1111/jvim.17207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>New feline erythrocyte antigens (FEAs) have been described based on the presence of naturally occurring alloantibodies (NOAb), but their immunogenicity and clinical relevance are poorly understood.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis/objectives: </strong>Describe the immunogenicity of FEA 4 after sensitizing FEA 4-negative cats lacking NOAb and characterize anti-FEA 4 alloantibodies produced, including their rate of appearance, agglutination titer, and immunoglobulin class.</p><p><strong>Animals: </strong>Nineteen healthy type A cats were blood typed for FEAs 1 to 5 to identify suitable donor-recipient pairs for FEA 4 sensitization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four FEA 4-negative cats were transfused with FEA 4-positive red blood cells. Using a gel column technique, posttransfusion samples were screened daily for a week, weekly for a month, and monthly thereafter for anti-FEA 4 alloantibodies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Alloantibodies were not detected in the first 3 recipients despite repeated transfusions (1 and 3 additional transfusions for 2 and 1 recipients, respectively). In the 4th recipient, alloantibodies against its donor red blood cells were detected 21 days postsensitization. However, they were not directed against FEA 4, but rather against a novel FEA not yet described. The alloantibodies, named anti-FEA 6, remained detectable for >4 months after sensitization and were determined to be mostly immunoglobulin M based on sulfhydryl treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical importance: </strong>Feline erythrocyte antigen 4 does not appear to be immunogenic because repeated sensitization of 4 cats failed to produce detectable anti-FEA 4 alloantibodies. A new immunogenic antigen, named FEA 6, has been discovered, but additional studies are needed to document its clinical importance.</p>","PeriodicalId":17462,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.17207","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: New feline erythrocyte antigens (FEAs) have been described based on the presence of naturally occurring alloantibodies (NOAb), but their immunogenicity and clinical relevance are poorly understood.
Hypothesis/objectives: Describe the immunogenicity of FEA 4 after sensitizing FEA 4-negative cats lacking NOAb and characterize anti-FEA 4 alloantibodies produced, including their rate of appearance, agglutination titer, and immunoglobulin class.
Animals: Nineteen healthy type A cats were blood typed for FEAs 1 to 5 to identify suitable donor-recipient pairs for FEA 4 sensitization.
Methods: Four FEA 4-negative cats were transfused with FEA 4-positive red blood cells. Using a gel column technique, posttransfusion samples were screened daily for a week, weekly for a month, and monthly thereafter for anti-FEA 4 alloantibodies.
Results: Alloantibodies were not detected in the first 3 recipients despite repeated transfusions (1 and 3 additional transfusions for 2 and 1 recipients, respectively). In the 4th recipient, alloantibodies against its donor red blood cells were detected 21 days postsensitization. However, they were not directed against FEA 4, but rather against a novel FEA not yet described. The alloantibodies, named anti-FEA 6, remained detectable for >4 months after sensitization and were determined to be mostly immunoglobulin M based on sulfhydryl treatment.
Conclusions and clinical importance: Feline erythrocyte antigen 4 does not appear to be immunogenic because repeated sensitization of 4 cats failed to produce detectable anti-FEA 4 alloantibodies. A new immunogenic antigen, named FEA 6, has been discovered, but additional studies are needed to document its clinical importance.
期刊介绍:
The mission of the Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine is to advance veterinary medical knowledge and improve the lives of animals by publication of authoritative scientific articles of animal diseases.