Oxford Nanopore's 2024 sequencing technology for Listeria monocytogenes outbreak detection and source attribution: progress and clone-specific challenges.

IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Pub Date : 2024-11-13 Epub Date: 2024-10-04 DOI:10.1128/jcm.01083-24
Michael Biggel, Nicole Cernela, Jule Anna Horlbog, Roger Stephan
{"title":"Oxford Nanopore's 2024 sequencing technology for <i>Listeria monocytogenes</i> outbreak detection and source attribution: progress and clone-specific challenges.","authors":"Michael Biggel, Nicole Cernela, Jule Anna Horlbog, Roger Stephan","doi":"10.1128/jcm.01083-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Whole genome sequencing is an essential cornerstone of pathogen surveillance and outbreak detection. Established sequencing technologies are currently being challenged by Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT), which offers an accessible and cost-effective alternative enabling gap-free assemblies of chromosomes and plasmids. Limited accuracy has hindered its use for investigating pathogen transmission, but recent technology updates have brought significant improvements. To evaluate its readiness for outbreak detection, we selected 78 <i>Listeria monocytogenes</i> isolates from diverse lineages or known epidemiological clusters for sequencing with ONT's V14 Rapid Barcoding Kit and R10.4.1 flow cells. The most accurate of several tested workflows generated assemblies with a median of one error (SNP or indel) per assembly. For 66 isolates, the cgMLST profiles from ONT-only assemblies were identical to those generated from Illumina data. Eight assemblies were of lower quality, with more than 20 erroneous sites each, primarily caused by methylations at the GAAGAC motif (5'-GAAG<u>6mA</u>C-3'/5'-GT<u>4mC</u>TTC-3'). This led to inaccurate clustering, failing to group isolates from a persistence-associated clone that carried the responsible restriction-modification system. Out of 50 methylation motifs detected among the 78 isolates, only the GAAGAC motif was linked to substantially increased error rates. Our study shows that most <i>L. monocytogenes</i> genomes assembled from ONT-only data are suitable for high-resolution genotyping, but further improvements of chemistries or basecallers are required for reliable routine use in outbreak and food safety investigations.</p>","PeriodicalId":15511,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0108324"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11559035/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.01083-24","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Whole genome sequencing is an essential cornerstone of pathogen surveillance and outbreak detection. Established sequencing technologies are currently being challenged by Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT), which offers an accessible and cost-effective alternative enabling gap-free assemblies of chromosomes and plasmids. Limited accuracy has hindered its use for investigating pathogen transmission, but recent technology updates have brought significant improvements. To evaluate its readiness for outbreak detection, we selected 78 Listeria monocytogenes isolates from diverse lineages or known epidemiological clusters for sequencing with ONT's V14 Rapid Barcoding Kit and R10.4.1 flow cells. The most accurate of several tested workflows generated assemblies with a median of one error (SNP or indel) per assembly. For 66 isolates, the cgMLST profiles from ONT-only assemblies were identical to those generated from Illumina data. Eight assemblies were of lower quality, with more than 20 erroneous sites each, primarily caused by methylations at the GAAGAC motif (5'-GAAG6mAC-3'/5'-GT4mCTTC-3'). This led to inaccurate clustering, failing to group isolates from a persistence-associated clone that carried the responsible restriction-modification system. Out of 50 methylation motifs detected among the 78 isolates, only the GAAGAC motif was linked to substantially increased error rates. Our study shows that most L. monocytogenes genomes assembled from ONT-only data are suitable for high-resolution genotyping, but further improvements of chemistries or basecallers are required for reliable routine use in outbreak and food safety investigations.

牛津纳米孔公司的 2024 测序技术用于李斯特菌疫情检测和来源归因:进展与特定克隆的挑战。
全基因组测序是病原体监控和疫情检测的重要基石。目前,牛津纳米孔技术公司(ONT)正在对现有的测序技术提出挑战,该公司提供了一种方便、经济的替代技术,可实现染色体和质粒的无间隙组装。有限的准确性阻碍了它在病原体传播调查中的应用,但最近的技术更新带来了重大改进。为了评估其在疫情检测方面的准备情况,我们从不同的菌系或已知的流行病集群中选择了 78 个李斯特菌分离物,用 ONT 的 V14 快速条形码试剂盒和 R10.4.1 流式细胞进行测序。在几种测试的工作流程中,最准确的工作流程生成的组装结果中位数为每个组装结果只有一个错误(SNP 或 indel)。对于 66 个分离物,纯 ONT 组装生成的 cgMLST 图谱与 Illumina 数据生成的完全相同。有 8 个装配质量较低,每个装配有 20 多个错误位点,主要是由 GAAGAC 主题(5'-GAAG6mAC-3'/5'-GT4mCTTC-3')的甲基化造成的。这导致了不准确的聚类,无法将携带限制性修饰系统的持久性相关克隆中的分离物进行聚类。在 78 个分离株中检测到的 50 个甲基化主题中,只有 GAAGAC 主题与错误率大幅增加有关。我们的研究表明,仅用 ONT 数据组装的大多数单核细胞增多症基因组适合于高分辨率基因分型,但要在疫情爆发和食品安全调查中可靠地常规使用,还需要进一步改进化学试剂或唤基程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Journal of Clinical Microbiology 医学-微生物学
CiteScore
17.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
347
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Microbiology® disseminates the latest research concerning the laboratory diagnosis of human and animal infections, along with the laboratory's role in epidemiology and the management of infectious diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信