Estimation of transpulmonary driving pressure using a lower assist maneuver (LAM) during synchronized ventilation in patients with acute respiratory failure: a physiological study.

IF 2.8 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Ling Liu, Hao He, Meihao Liang, Jennifer Beck, Christer Sinderby
{"title":"Estimation of transpulmonary driving pressure using a lower assist maneuver (LAM) during synchronized ventilation in patients with acute respiratory failure: a physiological study.","authors":"Ling Liu, Hao He, Meihao Liang, Jennifer Beck, Christer Sinderby","doi":"10.1186/s40635-024-00674-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We previously showed in animals that transpulmonary driving pressure (PL) can be estimated during Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA) and Neural Pressure Support (NPS) using a single lower assist maneuver (LAM). The aim of this study was to test the LAM-based estimate of PL (PL_LAM) in patients with acute respiratory failure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective, physiological, and interventional study in intubated patients with acute respiratory failure. During both NAVA and simulated NPS (high and low levels of assist), a LAM was performed every 3 min by manually reducing the assist to zero for one single breath (by default, ventilator still provides 2 cmH<sub>2</sub>O). Following NAVA and NPS<sub>SIM</sub> periods, patients were sedated and passively ventilated in volume control and pressure control ventilation, to obtain PL during controlled mechanical ventilation (PL_CMV). PL using an esophageal balloon (PL_Pes) was also compared to PL_LAM and PL_CMV. We measured diaphragm electrical activity (Edi), ventilator pressure (PVent), esophageal pressure (Pes) and tidal volume. PL_LAM and PL_Pes were compared to themselves, and to PL_CMV for matching flows and volumes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten patients were included in the study. For the group, PL_LAM was closely similar to PL_CMV, with a high correlation (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.88). Bland-Altman analysis revealed a low Bias of 0.28 cmH<sub>2</sub>O, and 1.96SD of 5.26 cmH<sub>2</sub>O. PL_LAM vs PL_Pes were also tightly related (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.77).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This physiological study in patients confirms our previous pre-clinical data that PL_LAM is as good an estimate as PL_Pes to determine PL, in spontaneously breathing patients on assisted mechanical ventilation. Trial registration The study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (ID NCT05378802) on November 6, 2021.</p>","PeriodicalId":13750,"journal":{"name":"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental","volume":"12 1","pages":"89"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11452363/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-024-00674-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We previously showed in animals that transpulmonary driving pressure (PL) can be estimated during Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA) and Neural Pressure Support (NPS) using a single lower assist maneuver (LAM). The aim of this study was to test the LAM-based estimate of PL (PL_LAM) in patients with acute respiratory failure.

Methods: This was a prospective, physiological, and interventional study in intubated patients with acute respiratory failure. During both NAVA and simulated NPS (high and low levels of assist), a LAM was performed every 3 min by manually reducing the assist to zero for one single breath (by default, ventilator still provides 2 cmH2O). Following NAVA and NPSSIM periods, patients were sedated and passively ventilated in volume control and pressure control ventilation, to obtain PL during controlled mechanical ventilation (PL_CMV). PL using an esophageal balloon (PL_Pes) was also compared to PL_LAM and PL_CMV. We measured diaphragm electrical activity (Edi), ventilator pressure (PVent), esophageal pressure (Pes) and tidal volume. PL_LAM and PL_Pes were compared to themselves, and to PL_CMV for matching flows and volumes.

Results: Ten patients were included in the study. For the group, PL_LAM was closely similar to PL_CMV, with a high correlation (R2 = 0.88). Bland-Altman analysis revealed a low Bias of 0.28 cmH2O, and 1.96SD of 5.26 cmH2O. PL_LAM vs PL_Pes were also tightly related (R2 = 0.77).

Conclusion: This physiological study in patients confirms our previous pre-clinical data that PL_LAM is as good an estimate as PL_Pes to determine PL, in spontaneously breathing patients on assisted mechanical ventilation. Trial registration The study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (ID NCT05378802) on November 6, 2021.

在急性呼吸衰竭患者同步通气过程中使用下辅助操作(LAM)估算跨肺驱动压力:一项生理学研究。
背景:我们之前在动物身上发现,在神经调整通气辅助(NAVA)和神经压力支持(NPS)期间,使用单次下辅助动作(LAM)就能估算出跨肺驱动压力(PL)。本研究的目的是在急性呼吸衰竭患者中测试基于 LAM 的 PL 估计值(PL_LAM):这是一项针对急性呼吸衰竭插管患者的前瞻性、生理学和介入性研究。在 NAVA 和模拟 NPS(高水平和低水平辅助)期间,每 3 分钟手动将单次呼吸的辅助减至零(默认情况下,呼吸机仍提供 2 cmH2O),从而进行一次 LAM。在 NAVA 和 NPSSIM 阶段之后,对患者进行镇静并在容量控制和压力控制通气中进行被动通气,以获得受控机械通气期间的 PL(PL_CMV)。使用食道球囊的 PL(PL_Pes)也与 PL_LAM 和 PL_CMV 进行了比较。我们测量了膈肌电活动(Edi)、呼吸机压力(PVent)、食管压力(Pes)和潮气量。将 PL_LAM 和 PL_Pes 与其自身进行比较,并与 PL_CMV 进行比较,以匹配流量和潮气量:研究共纳入了 10 名患者。就该组患者而言,PL_LAM 与 PL_CMV 非常相似,相关性很高(R2 = 0.88)。Bland-Altman 分析显示,偏差为 0.28 cmH2O,1.96SD 为 5.26 cmH2O。PL_LAM 与 PL_Pes 也密切相关(R2 = 0.77):这项患者生理学研究证实了我们之前的临床前数据,即在辅助机械通气的自主呼吸患者中,PL_LAM 与 PL_Pes 一样是确定 PL 的良好估计值。试验注册 该研究于 2021 年 11 月 6 日在 clinicaltrials.gov 注册(ID NCT05378802)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
48
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信