Use of strain imaging to detect subtle myocardial involvement in post COVID-19 patients: An Indian perspective.

IF 1.4 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Indian heart journal Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ihj.2024.09.003
Deepak Tomar, Aditya Kapoor, Zia Hashim, Kamlesh Raut, Arpita Katheria, Harshit Khare, Ankit Sahu, Roopali Khanna, Sudeep Kumar, Naveen Garg, Satyendra Tewari
{"title":"Use of strain imaging to detect subtle myocardial involvement in post COVID-19 patients: An Indian perspective.","authors":"Deepak Tomar, Aditya Kapoor, Zia Hashim, Kamlesh Raut, Arpita Katheria, Harshit Khare, Ankit Sahu, Roopali Khanna, Sudeep Kumar, Naveen Garg, Satyendra Tewari","doi":"10.1016/j.ihj.2024.09.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The study assessed Global longitudinal strain imaging (GLS) to detect subtle myocardial dysfunction among patients clinically recovered from COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients (n = 101 76 % males, mean age 55.45 ± 11.14 years), and controls (n = 30), underwent clinical assessment and echocardiography, including GLS assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of diabetes mellitus, hypertension and dyslipidemia was comparable amongst patients and controls. The average GLS was significantly lesser in post COVID patients (-16.21 ± 1.96 vs -18.49 ± 1.64 respectively, p = 0.004) and significantly higher proportion of post COVID patients had GLS > -18 % (43 % vs 22.58 % respectively, p = 0.001) as compared to controls. The RV free wall longitudinal strain (RVFLS) was also lower in the patient group (22.35 ± 4.69 vs 24.19 ± 4.11, p = 0.004) and 21.7 % post COVID-19 patients had pathological RV FWLS (> -20 %) vs controls (6.6 %). Average GLS was significantly lesser in severe post COVID patients (viz -14.25 ± 1.92 vs -16.63 ± 1.61 vs -17.63 ± 1.91, p < 0.0001, respectively among severe, moderate and mild COVID-19 patients. On performing regression analysis, severity of COVID-19 (OR 7.762) was a significant predictor of impaired GLS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite normal global LVEF, post COVID-19 recovered patients had significantly lower LV GLS and RV FWLS with severe COVID-19 infection, regardless of having a clinical recovery. This study reiterates the importance of speckle tracking echocardiography as an important imaging modality for detection of subclinical myocardial dysfunction in the post COVID-19 recovered patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":13384,"journal":{"name":"Indian heart journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian heart journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2024.09.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The study assessed Global longitudinal strain imaging (GLS) to detect subtle myocardial dysfunction among patients clinically recovered from COVID-19.

Methods: All patients (n = 101 76 % males, mean age 55.45 ± 11.14 years), and controls (n = 30), underwent clinical assessment and echocardiography, including GLS assessment.

Results: The prevalence of diabetes mellitus, hypertension and dyslipidemia was comparable amongst patients and controls. The average GLS was significantly lesser in post COVID patients (-16.21 ± 1.96 vs -18.49 ± 1.64 respectively, p = 0.004) and significantly higher proportion of post COVID patients had GLS > -18 % (43 % vs 22.58 % respectively, p = 0.001) as compared to controls. The RV free wall longitudinal strain (RVFLS) was also lower in the patient group (22.35 ± 4.69 vs 24.19 ± 4.11, p = 0.004) and 21.7 % post COVID-19 patients had pathological RV FWLS (> -20 %) vs controls (6.6 %). Average GLS was significantly lesser in severe post COVID patients (viz -14.25 ± 1.92 vs -16.63 ± 1.61 vs -17.63 ± 1.91, p < 0.0001, respectively among severe, moderate and mild COVID-19 patients. On performing regression analysis, severity of COVID-19 (OR 7.762) was a significant predictor of impaired GLS.

Conclusion: Despite normal global LVEF, post COVID-19 recovered patients had significantly lower LV GLS and RV FWLS with severe COVID-19 infection, regardless of having a clinical recovery. This study reiterates the importance of speckle tracking echocardiography as an important imaging modality for detection of subclinical myocardial dysfunction in the post COVID-19 recovered patients.

使用应变成像检测科维德-19 后患者心肌的细微受累情况:印度视角。
背景:该研究评估了全球纵向应变成像(GLS)在COVID-19临床康复患者中检测细微心肌功能障碍的能力:该研究评估了全球纵向应变成像(GLS)在COVID-19临床康复患者中检测细微心肌功能障碍的效果:所有患者(n=101,76% 为男性,平均年龄(55.45±11.14)岁)和对照组(n=30)均接受了临床评估和超声心动图检查,包括 GLS 评估:结果:患者和对照组的糖尿病、高血压和血脂异常患病率相当。COVID后患者的平均GLS明显低于对照组(分别为-16.21 ± 1.96 vs -18.49 ± 1.64,P = 0.004),与对照组相比,COVID后患者GLS>-18%的比例明显更高(分别为43% vs 22.58%,P =0.001)。患者组的 RV 游离壁纵向应变(RVFLS)也较低(22.35 ± 4.69 vs 24.19 ± 4.11,P =0.004),21.7% 的 COVID-19 后患者有病理性 RV FWLS(> -20%),对照组为 6.6%。重度 COVID-19 后患者的平均 GLS 明显低于对照组(即 -14.25 ± 1.92 vs -16.63 ± 1.61 vs -17.63 ± 1.91,重度、中度和轻度 COVID-19 患者的 P <0.0001)。在进行回归分析时,COVID-19 的严重程度(OR 7.762)是 GLS 受损的重要预测因素:结论:尽管总体 LVEF 正常,但 COVID-19 后康复患者的 LV GLS 和 RV FWLS 明显低于重度 COVID-19 感染者,与临床康复无关。这项研究重申了斑点追踪超声心动图的重要性,它是检测COVID-19康复后患者亚临床心肌功能障碍的重要成像方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indian heart journal
Indian heart journal CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
82
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: Indian Heart Journal (IHJ) is the official peer-reviewed open access journal of Cardiological Society of India and accepts articles for publication from across the globe. The journal aims to promote high quality research and serve as a platform for dissemination of scientific information in cardiology with particular focus on South Asia. The journal aims to publish cutting edge research in the field of clinical as well as non-clinical cardiology - including cardiovascular medicine and surgery. Some of the topics covered are Heart Failure, Coronary Artery Disease, Hypertension, Interventional Cardiology, Cardiac Surgery, Valvular Heart Disease, Pulmonary Hypertension and Infective Endocarditis. IHJ open access invites original research articles, research briefs, perspective, case reports, case vignette, cardiovascular images, cardiovascular graphics, research letters, correspondence, reader forum, and interesting photographs, for publication. IHJ open access also publishes theme-based special issues and abstracts of papers presented at the annual conference of the Cardiological Society of India.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信