Comprehensive clinical evaluation of indirect and direct bonding techniques in orthodontic treatment: a single-centre, open-label, quasi-randomized controlled clinical trial.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Kana Kono, Takashi Murakami, Saori Tanizaki, Noriaki Kawanabe, Atsuro Fujisawa, Masahiro Nakamura, Mitsuhiro Hoshijima, Takashi Izawa, Hiroshi Kamioka
{"title":"Comprehensive clinical evaluation of indirect and direct bonding techniques in orthodontic treatment: a single-centre, open-label, quasi-randomized controlled clinical trial.","authors":"Kana Kono, Takashi Murakami, Saori Tanizaki, Noriaki Kawanabe, Atsuro Fujisawa, Masahiro Nakamura, Mitsuhiro Hoshijima, Takashi Izawa, Hiroshi Kamioka","doi":"10.1093/ejo/cjae036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Few prospective investigations have compared direct and indirect techniques through comprehensive and detailed clinical evaluations, considering the impact of all factors.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to compare and evaluate direct and indirect bonding methods at a single institution and to clarify the selection criteria for the bonding method.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This single-centre, quasi-randomized controlled clinical trial included 153 patients who required fixed orthodontic treatment. They were randomly divided into indirect and direct binding groups by the project lead (K.K.), who was blinded to all clinical data, and performed the allocation using medical record numbers. The chair time for bracket bonding, discomfort during bracket bonding, oral hygiene after bonding, number of bracket failures, number of intentional bracket reattachments, post-treatment occlusal index, and total treatment time were assessed. Outcomes were compared using a two-sample t-test or Mann-Whitney U test (P < .05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-eight patients were included in the indirect bonding group (20 male, 38 female; mean age: 20.63 ± 5.69 years) and 66 (14 male, 52 female; mean age: 23.17 ± 8.83 years) in the direct bonding group. Compared to the direct bonding group, the indirect bonding group had shorter chair time (P < .001), a shorter total treatment period (P < .01), and a better final occlusal relationship (P < .001). The number of bracket detachments was higher (P < .001) in the indirect bonding group, but the number of intentional reattachments was lower (P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Indirect bonding may improve the efficiency of orthodontic treatment.</p><p><strong>Harms: </strong>No harm was observed during the study.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>This trial was approved by the Ethics Review Committee of Okayama University (approval number: d10001), UMIN registration number 000022182.</p>","PeriodicalId":11989,"journal":{"name":"European journal of orthodontics","volume":"46 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11450403/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjae036","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Few prospective investigations have compared direct and indirect techniques through comprehensive and detailed clinical evaluations, considering the impact of all factors.

Objectives: This study aimed to compare and evaluate direct and indirect bonding methods at a single institution and to clarify the selection criteria for the bonding method.

Materials and methods: This single-centre, quasi-randomized controlled clinical trial included 153 patients who required fixed orthodontic treatment. They were randomly divided into indirect and direct binding groups by the project lead (K.K.), who was blinded to all clinical data, and performed the allocation using medical record numbers. The chair time for bracket bonding, discomfort during bracket bonding, oral hygiene after bonding, number of bracket failures, number of intentional bracket reattachments, post-treatment occlusal index, and total treatment time were assessed. Outcomes were compared using a two-sample t-test or Mann-Whitney U test (P < .05).

Results: Fifty-eight patients were included in the indirect bonding group (20 male, 38 female; mean age: 20.63 ± 5.69 years) and 66 (14 male, 52 female; mean age: 23.17 ± 8.83 years) in the direct bonding group. Compared to the direct bonding group, the indirect bonding group had shorter chair time (P < .001), a shorter total treatment period (P < .01), and a better final occlusal relationship (P < .001). The number of bracket detachments was higher (P < .001) in the indirect bonding group, but the number of intentional reattachments was lower (P < .001).

Conclusion: Indirect bonding may improve the efficiency of orthodontic treatment.

Harms: No harm was observed during the study.

Trial registration number: This trial was approved by the Ethics Review Committee of Okayama University (approval number: d10001), UMIN registration number 000022182.

正畸治疗中间接粘接和直接粘接技术的综合临床评估:单中心、开放标签、准随机对照临床试验。
背景:很少有前瞻性研究通过全面、详细的临床评估对直接和间接技术进行比较,并考虑所有因素的影响:本研究旨在比较和评估一家机构的直接粘接和间接粘接方法,并明确粘接方法的选择标准:这项单中心、准随机对照临床试验包括 153 名需要进行固定正畸治疗的患者。项目负责人(K.K.)将这些患者随机分为间接粘结组和直接粘结组,他对所有临床数据都是盲法,并使用医疗记录编号进行分配。研究人员对托槽粘结的椅上时间、托槽粘结过程中的不适感、粘结后的口腔卫生、托槽失败的次数、有意重新粘结托槽的次数、治疗后咬合指数和总治疗时间进行了评估。结果比较采用双样本 t 检验或 Mann-Whitney U 检验(P 结果):间接粘接组有 58 名患者(20 名男性,38 名女性;平均年龄:20.63 ± 5.69 岁),直接粘接组有 66 名患者(14 名男性,52 名女性;平均年龄:23.17 ± 8.83 岁)。与直接粘接组相比,间接粘接组的牙椅时间更短(P 结论:间接粘接可提高牙科手术的效率:间接粘接可提高正畸治疗的效率:研究期间未发现任何危害:本试验已获得冈山大学伦理审查委员会批准(批准号:d10001),UMIN 注册号:000022182。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European journal of orthodontics
European journal of orthodontics 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
71
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Orthodontics publishes papers of excellence on all aspects of orthodontics including craniofacial development and growth. The emphasis of the journal is on full research papers. Succinct and carefully prepared papers are favoured in terms of impact as well as readability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信