Marko Turkalj, Manosij Ghosh, Stevan M Čokić, Peter H M Hoet, Jeroen Vanoirbeek, Bart Van Meerbeek, Kirsten L Van Landuyt
{"title":"Cytotoxicity assessment of eluates from vacuum-forming thermoplastics.","authors":"Marko Turkalj, Manosij Ghosh, Stevan M Čokić, Peter H M Hoet, Jeroen Vanoirbeek, Bart Van Meerbeek, Kirsten L Van Landuyt","doi":"10.1007/s00784-024-05952-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate possible cytotoxic effects of thermoplastic materials commonly used for occlusal splints and orthodontic appliances.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seven thermoplastics were included: three variants of the Essix sheets (C+, Plus, and Tray Rite; Dentsply Sirona), three thermoplastics (Bleach Heavy, Splint, and X-Heavy; Cavex Holland) and Invisalign (Align Technology). Cylindrical specimens (n = 24; 10 mm diameter) were incubated in cell culture medium for 24 h and 14 days. After incubation, the medium was collected, serially diluted, and dosed to primary human gingival fibroblasts in triplicate. Medium processed like the samples was used as negative control. Cell viability was evaluated by XTT and LDH assay to assess metabolic activity and membrane integrity, respectively. Next, cell cycle was assessed with flow cytometry after exposing HGFs to undiluted extracts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 24-hour and 14-day extracts did not evoke cytotoxicity after 24-hour incubation. No significant differences in cell viability (one-way ANOVA, p > 0.05 ) in the XTT and LDH assays or in cell cycle distribution between the different materials (two-way ANOVA, p > 0.05 ).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The thermoplastics tested in the study showed no evident in-vitro cytotoxic effects. Further investigation should focus on determining which compounds are released from thermoplastic materials and assessing potential toxicity related to exposure to these compounds.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Our study adds to the growing body of evidence on the biocompatibility of dental thermoplastics. This can aid clinical decision-making, as thermoplastics are expected to be safe to use in terms of cytotoxicity.</p>","PeriodicalId":10461,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Investigations","volume":"28 10","pages":"570"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-024-05952-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate possible cytotoxic effects of thermoplastic materials commonly used for occlusal splints and orthodontic appliances.
Methods: Seven thermoplastics were included: three variants of the Essix sheets (C+, Plus, and Tray Rite; Dentsply Sirona), three thermoplastics (Bleach Heavy, Splint, and X-Heavy; Cavex Holland) and Invisalign (Align Technology). Cylindrical specimens (n = 24; 10 mm diameter) were incubated in cell culture medium for 24 h and 14 days. After incubation, the medium was collected, serially diluted, and dosed to primary human gingival fibroblasts in triplicate. Medium processed like the samples was used as negative control. Cell viability was evaluated by XTT and LDH assay to assess metabolic activity and membrane integrity, respectively. Next, cell cycle was assessed with flow cytometry after exposing HGFs to undiluted extracts.
Results: The 24-hour and 14-day extracts did not evoke cytotoxicity after 24-hour incubation. No significant differences in cell viability (one-way ANOVA, p > 0.05 ) in the XTT and LDH assays or in cell cycle distribution between the different materials (two-way ANOVA, p > 0.05 ).
Conclusion: The thermoplastics tested in the study showed no evident in-vitro cytotoxic effects. Further investigation should focus on determining which compounds are released from thermoplastic materials and assessing potential toxicity related to exposure to these compounds.
Clinical significance: Our study adds to the growing body of evidence on the biocompatibility of dental thermoplastics. This can aid clinical decision-making, as thermoplastics are expected to be safe to use in terms of cytotoxicity.
期刊介绍:
The journal Clinical Oral Investigations is a multidisciplinary, international forum for publication of research from all fields of oral medicine. The journal publishes original scientific articles and invited reviews which provide up-to-date results of basic and clinical studies in oral and maxillofacial science and medicine. The aim is to clarify the relevance of new results to modern practice, for an international readership. Coverage includes maxillofacial and oral surgery, prosthetics and restorative dentistry, operative dentistry, endodontics, periodontology, orthodontics, dental materials science, clinical trials, epidemiology, pedodontics, oral implant, preventive dentistiry, oral pathology, oral basic sciences and more.