Cytotoxicity assessment of eluates from vacuum-forming thermoplastics.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Marko Turkalj, Manosij Ghosh, Stevan M Čokić, Peter H M Hoet, Jeroen Vanoirbeek, Bart Van Meerbeek, Kirsten L Van Landuyt
{"title":"Cytotoxicity assessment of eluates from vacuum-forming thermoplastics.","authors":"Marko Turkalj, Manosij Ghosh, Stevan M Čokić, Peter H M Hoet, Jeroen Vanoirbeek, Bart Van Meerbeek, Kirsten L Van Landuyt","doi":"10.1007/s00784-024-05952-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate possible cytotoxic effects of thermoplastic materials commonly used for occlusal splints and orthodontic appliances.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seven thermoplastics were included: three variants of the Essix sheets (C+, Plus, and Tray Rite; Dentsply Sirona), three thermoplastics (Bleach Heavy, Splint, and X-Heavy; Cavex Holland) and Invisalign (Align Technology). Cylindrical specimens (n = 24; 10 mm diameter) were incubated in cell culture medium for 24 h and 14 days. After incubation, the medium was collected, serially diluted, and dosed to primary human gingival fibroblasts in triplicate. Medium processed like the samples was used as negative control. Cell viability was evaluated by XTT and LDH assay to assess metabolic activity and membrane integrity, respectively. Next, cell cycle was assessed with flow cytometry after exposing HGFs to undiluted extracts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 24-hour and 14-day extracts did not evoke cytotoxicity after 24-hour incubation. No significant differences in cell viability (one-way ANOVA, p > 0.05 ) in the XTT and LDH assays or in cell cycle distribution between the different materials (two-way ANOVA, p > 0.05 ).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The thermoplastics tested in the study showed no evident in-vitro cytotoxic effects. Further investigation should focus on determining which compounds are released from thermoplastic materials and assessing potential toxicity related to exposure to these compounds.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Our study adds to the growing body of evidence on the biocompatibility of dental thermoplastics. This can aid clinical decision-making, as thermoplastics are expected to be safe to use in terms of cytotoxicity.</p>","PeriodicalId":10461,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Investigations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-024-05952-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate possible cytotoxic effects of thermoplastic materials commonly used for occlusal splints and orthodontic appliances.

Methods: Seven thermoplastics were included: three variants of the Essix sheets (C+, Plus, and Tray Rite; Dentsply Sirona), three thermoplastics (Bleach Heavy, Splint, and X-Heavy; Cavex Holland) and Invisalign (Align Technology). Cylindrical specimens (n = 24; 10 mm diameter) were incubated in cell culture medium for 24 h and 14 days. After incubation, the medium was collected, serially diluted, and dosed to primary human gingival fibroblasts in triplicate. Medium processed like the samples was used as negative control. Cell viability was evaluated by XTT and LDH assay to assess metabolic activity and membrane integrity, respectively. Next, cell cycle was assessed with flow cytometry after exposing HGFs to undiluted extracts.

Results: The 24-hour and 14-day extracts did not evoke cytotoxicity after 24-hour incubation. No significant differences in cell viability (one-way ANOVA, p > 0.05 ) in the XTT and LDH assays or in cell cycle distribution between the different materials (two-way ANOVA, p > 0.05 ).

Conclusion: The thermoplastics tested in the study showed no evident in-vitro cytotoxic effects. Further investigation should focus on determining which compounds are released from thermoplastic materials and assessing potential toxicity related to exposure to these compounds.

Clinical significance: Our study adds to the growing body of evidence on the biocompatibility of dental thermoplastics. This can aid clinical decision-making, as thermoplastics are expected to be safe to use in terms of cytotoxicity.

真空成型热塑性塑料洗脱液的细胞毒性评估。
研究目的本研究旨在评估常用于咬合夹板和正畸器械的热塑性材料可能产生的细胞毒性效应:包括七种热塑性塑料:三种 Essix 片材(C+、Plus 和 Tray Rite;Dentsply Sirona)、三种热塑性塑料(Bleach Heavy、Splint 和 X-Heavy;Cavex Holland)和 Invisalign(Align Technology)。圆柱形试样(n = 24;直径 10 毫米)在细胞培养基中培养 24 小时和 14 天。培养结束后,收集培养基,进行系列稀释,并以一式三份的方式分给原代人类牙龈成纤维细胞。与样本处理方法相同的培养基用作阴性对照。用 XTT 和 LDH 检测法评估细胞活力,以分别评估代谢活性和膜完整性。然后,在将 HGFs 暴露于未稀释的提取物后,用流式细胞仪评估细胞周期:结果:24 小时和 14 天提取物在 24 小时培养后不会引起细胞毒性。在 XTT 和 LDH 试验中,不同材料的细胞存活率(单因素方差分析,p > 0.05)和细胞周期分布(双因素方差分析,p > 0.05)无明显差异:结论:本研究中测试的热塑性塑料没有显示出明显的体外细胞毒性效应。进一步的研究应侧重于确定热塑性材料中释放出哪些化合物,并评估与接触这些化合物有关的潜在毒性:我们的研究为牙科热塑性塑料的生物相容性提供了更多证据。临床意义:我们的研究为牙科热塑性塑料的生物相容性提供了越来越多的证据,这有助于临床决策,因为热塑性塑料在细胞毒性方面可以安全使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Oral Investigations
Clinical Oral Investigations 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
484
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The journal Clinical Oral Investigations is a multidisciplinary, international forum for publication of research from all fields of oral medicine. The journal publishes original scientific articles and invited reviews which provide up-to-date results of basic and clinical studies in oral and maxillofacial science and medicine. The aim is to clarify the relevance of new results to modern practice, for an international readership. Coverage includes maxillofacial and oral surgery, prosthetics and restorative dentistry, operative dentistry, endodontics, periodontology, orthodontics, dental materials science, clinical trials, epidemiology, pedodontics, oral implant, preventive dentistiry, oral pathology, oral basic sciences and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信