Supporting traceability and biosecurity in the sheep and goat industries in NSW: understanding barriers to implementing electronic identification

IF 1.3 4区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
M Hernandez-Jover, L Hayes, J Manyweathers, T Marriott, MB Allworth
{"title":"Supporting traceability and biosecurity in the sheep and goat industries in NSW: understanding barriers to implementing electronic identification","authors":"M Hernandez-Jover,&nbsp;L Hayes,&nbsp;J Manyweathers,&nbsp;T Marriott,&nbsp;MB Allworth","doi":"10.1111/avj.13370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Efficient traceability is paramount for Australia's biosecurity system and market access. Electronic identification (eID) offers higher traceability performance than that achieved with visual and mob-based identification used for the sheep and goats National Livestock Identification System (NLIS). The current study aims to gain an understanding of the barriers and motivations of using eID for NLIS sheep and goats in New South Wales (NSW) and to provide recommendations to support the transition to eID. A social research study using a mixed-methods approach was used through semi-structured interviews and a cross-sectional epidemiological and behavioural study among sheep and goat producers. The COM-B behaviour change model based on capabilities, opportunities and motivations was used as a framework for the study. A total of 269 participants informed this study: 25 interviews were conducted with government, industry and private stakeholders, and 184 and 58 sheep and goat producers participated in the cross-sectional study, respectively. The study identified poor understanding of the purpose and importance of NLIS among producers, with over two-thirds not supporting eID implementation. The main barriers identified to the eID implementation were practical, including costs, technology quality and increased workload. Attitudinal, behavioural and knowledge barriers, such as the perception of the current system providing efficient traceability and the perceived lack of benefits of eID were also identified. This study provides an in-depth analysis of practices and perceptions of stakeholders and producers on sheep and goat traceability and recommendations to address barriers identified, based on education and appropriate behavioural and technical support.</p>","PeriodicalId":8661,"journal":{"name":"Australian Veterinary Journal","volume":"102 11","pages":"576-593"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/avj.13370","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Veterinary Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/avj.13370","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Efficient traceability is paramount for Australia's biosecurity system and market access. Electronic identification (eID) offers higher traceability performance than that achieved with visual and mob-based identification used for the sheep and goats National Livestock Identification System (NLIS). The current study aims to gain an understanding of the barriers and motivations of using eID for NLIS sheep and goats in New South Wales (NSW) and to provide recommendations to support the transition to eID. A social research study using a mixed-methods approach was used through semi-structured interviews and a cross-sectional epidemiological and behavioural study among sheep and goat producers. The COM-B behaviour change model based on capabilities, opportunities and motivations was used as a framework for the study. A total of 269 participants informed this study: 25 interviews were conducted with government, industry and private stakeholders, and 184 and 58 sheep and goat producers participated in the cross-sectional study, respectively. The study identified poor understanding of the purpose and importance of NLIS among producers, with over two-thirds not supporting eID implementation. The main barriers identified to the eID implementation were practical, including costs, technology quality and increased workload. Attitudinal, behavioural and knowledge barriers, such as the perception of the current system providing efficient traceability and the perceived lack of benefits of eID were also identified. This study provides an in-depth analysis of practices and perceptions of stakeholders and producers on sheep and goat traceability and recommendations to address barriers identified, based on education and appropriate behavioural and technical support.

Abstract Image

支持新南威尔士州绵羊和山羊产业的可追溯性和生物安全:了解实施电子识别的障碍。
高效的可追溯性对澳大利亚的生物安全系统和市场准入至关重要。与绵羊和山羊国家牲畜识别系统(NLIS)使用的目视识别和移动识别相比,电子识别(eID)具有更高的可追溯性。本研究旨在了解新南威尔士州(NSW)国家牲畜识别系统(NLIS)绵羊和山羊使用电子标识的障碍和动机,并提出支持向电子标识过渡的建议。该研究采用混合方法进行社会调查,对绵羊和山羊生产者进行了半结构化访谈以及横断面流行病学和行为研究。研究采用了基于能力、机会和动机的 COM-B 行为改变模型作为研究框架。共有 269 名参与者为本研究提供了信息:与政府、行业和私人利益相关者进行了 25 次访谈,分别有 184 名和 58 名绵羊和山羊生产者参加了横断面研究。研究发现,生产者对无标识系统的目的和重要性认识不足,超过三分之二的生产者不支持实施电子标识。实施电子标识的主要障碍是实际问题,包括成本、技术质量和工作量增加。此外,还发现了态度、行为和知识方面的障碍,如认为当前系统提供了有效的可追溯性,以及认为电子身份识别系统缺乏益处。本研究深入分析了利益相关者和生产者在绵羊和山羊可追溯性方面的做法和看法,并提出了基于教育和适当的行为与技术支持的建议,以解决所发现的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australian Veterinary Journal
Australian Veterinary Journal 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
85
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Over the past 80 years, the Australian Veterinary Journal (AVJ) has been providing the veterinary profession with leading edge clinical and scientific research, case reports, reviews. news and timely coverage of industry issues. AJV is Australia''s premier veterinary science text and is distributed monthly to over 5,500 Australian Veterinary Association members and subscribers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信