Anticipated buffer time – An evasive surrogate safety indicator for risk assessment of unsignalized intersections under heterogeneous traffic and aggressive driving conditions

IF 5.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 ERGONOMICS
Manish Dutta , Suprava Jena , Bansil Korat , Sarthak Bhandari , George Kennedy Lyngdoh
{"title":"Anticipated buffer time – An evasive surrogate safety indicator for risk assessment of unsignalized intersections under heterogeneous traffic and aggressive driving conditions","authors":"Manish Dutta ,&nbsp;Suprava Jena ,&nbsp;Bansil Korat ,&nbsp;Sarthak Bhandari ,&nbsp;George Kennedy Lyngdoh","doi":"10.1016/j.aap.2024.107796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Risk assessment of unsignalized intersections is particularly challenging when confronted with a combination of factors such as heavy traffic, diverse vehicle types, lane indiscipline, aggressive driving, and evasive manoeuvres. Understanding how people drive in these situations is crucial for accurately assessing the risks at unsignalized intersections. This study introduces a novel surrogate safety indicator, i.e. Anticipated Buffer Time (ABT), designed to account for these various factors. Additionally, three new indicators derived from ABT are introduced, namely ABT Negation Ratio, ABT Extremity Ratio, and ABT Progression Ratio. A risk assessment measure, denoted as UnSigRisk Score, is formulated using these three indicators for unsignalized intersections. Three intersections in Ahmedabad, India, were selected for the study due to their manifestation of these challenging conditions. Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient was estimated to find out how well can UnSigRisk Score measure is able to quantify evasive behaviour. The results indicate that this score proficiently measures evasive behaviour, exhibiting coefficients exceeding 0.6 in all cases—significantly outperforming the current evasive indicators, Yaw Rate Ratio and Jerk. The proposed risk assessment score could serve as a practical tool for transportation authorities, enabling them to identify the most vulnerable intersections and allocate resources for targeted safety interventions wisely. The study unequivocally demonstrates that the use of ABT paves the way for a thorough examination of safety at unsignalized intersections, regardless of driving behaviour and traffic conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":6926,"journal":{"name":"Accident; analysis and prevention","volume":"208 ","pages":"Article 107796"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accident; analysis and prevention","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457524003415","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Risk assessment of unsignalized intersections is particularly challenging when confronted with a combination of factors such as heavy traffic, diverse vehicle types, lane indiscipline, aggressive driving, and evasive manoeuvres. Understanding how people drive in these situations is crucial for accurately assessing the risks at unsignalized intersections. This study introduces a novel surrogate safety indicator, i.e. Anticipated Buffer Time (ABT), designed to account for these various factors. Additionally, three new indicators derived from ABT are introduced, namely ABT Negation Ratio, ABT Extremity Ratio, and ABT Progression Ratio. A risk assessment measure, denoted as UnSigRisk Score, is formulated using these three indicators for unsignalized intersections. Three intersections in Ahmedabad, India, were selected for the study due to their manifestation of these challenging conditions. Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient was estimated to find out how well can UnSigRisk Score measure is able to quantify evasive behaviour. The results indicate that this score proficiently measures evasive behaviour, exhibiting coefficients exceeding 0.6 in all cases—significantly outperforming the current evasive indicators, Yaw Rate Ratio and Jerk. The proposed risk assessment score could serve as a practical tool for transportation authorities, enabling them to identify the most vulnerable intersections and allocate resources for targeted safety interventions wisely. The study unequivocally demonstrates that the use of ABT paves the way for a thorough examination of safety at unsignalized intersections, regardless of driving behaviour and traffic conditions.
预计缓冲时间--在异质交通和激烈驾驶条件下,用于无信号交叉口风险评估的避让替代安全指标。
无信号交叉路口的风险评估尤其具有挑战性,因为会面临交通繁忙、车辆类型多样、车道不规范、激进驾驶和回避动作等综合因素。要准确评估无信号交叉路口的风险,了解人们在这些情况下的驾驶方式至关重要。本研究引入了一个新的替代安全指标,即预期缓冲时间(ABT),旨在考虑这些不同的因素。此外,还引入了从 ABT 派生的三个新指标,即 ABT 否定比、ABT 极端比和 ABT 进展比。利用这三个指标为无信号交叉路口制定了一个风险评估指标,称为 UnSigRisk Score。研究选择了印度艾哈迈达巴德的三个交叉路口,因为这些交叉路口都具有这些挑战性条件。对 Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient 进行了估算,以了解 UnSigRisk Score 测量方法对规避行为的量化程度。结果表明,该评分能有效衡量规避行为,在所有情况下系数均超过 0.6,明显优于当前的规避指标--偏航率比和抖动。建议的风险评估分数可作为交通管理部门的实用工具,使其能够识别最脆弱的交叉路口,并为有针对性的安全干预措施合理分配资源。这项研究明确表明,无论驾驶行为和交通状况如何,ABT 的使用都为彻底检查无信号交叉口的安全铺平了道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
16.90%
发文量
264
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Accident Analysis & Prevention provides wide coverage of the general areas relating to accidental injury and damage, including the pre-injury and immediate post-injury phases. Published papers deal with medical, legal, economic, educational, behavioral, theoretical or empirical aspects of transportation accidents, as well as with accidents at other sites. Selected topics within the scope of the Journal may include: studies of human, environmental and vehicular factors influencing the occurrence, type and severity of accidents and injury; the design, implementation and evaluation of countermeasures; biomechanics of impact and human tolerance limits to injury; modelling and statistical analysis of accident data; policy, planning and decision-making in safety.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信