Comparison of Matrix Product State and Multiconfiguration Time-Dependent Hartree Methods for Nonadiabatic Dynamics of Exciton Dissociation.

IF 5.7 1区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation Pub Date : 2024-10-22 Epub Date: 2024-10-04 DOI:10.1021/acs.jctc.4c00751
Maximilian F X Dorfner, Dominik Brey, Irene Burghardt, Frank Ortmann
{"title":"Comparison of Matrix Product State and Multiconfiguration Time-Dependent Hartree Methods for Nonadiabatic Dynamics of Exciton Dissociation.","authors":"Maximilian F X Dorfner, Dominik Brey, Irene Burghardt, Frank Ortmann","doi":"10.1021/acs.jctc.4c00751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The excited-state dynamics of organic molecules, molecular aggregates, and donor-acceptor clusters is typically governed by the interplay of electronic excitations and, due to their flexibility and soft bonding, by the interaction with their vibrations. This interaction in these systems can be characterized by a few relevant electronic states that are coupled to numerous vibrational normal modes, encompassing a vast configurational space of the molecules. The full quantum simulation of these type of systems has been long dominated by the multiconfiguration time-dependent Hartree (MCTDH) approach and its multilayer variants, which are considered the gold standard in the presence of electron-vibration coupling with a large number of modes. Recently, also the matrix product state ansatz (MPS) with appropriate time-evolution schemes has been applied to these types of Hamiltonians. In this article, we provide a numerical comparison of excited-state dynamics between the MCTDH and MPS approaches for two electron-vibration coupled systems. Notably, we consider two models for exciton dissociation at a P3HT:PCBM heterojunction, comprising two electronic states and 100 vibrational modes, and 26 electronic states and 113 vibrational modes, respectively. While both methods agree very well for the first model, more pronounced deviations are found for the second model. We trace back the divergence between the methods to the different way entanglement is treated.</p>","PeriodicalId":45,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11500411/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.4c00751","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The excited-state dynamics of organic molecules, molecular aggregates, and donor-acceptor clusters is typically governed by the interplay of electronic excitations and, due to their flexibility and soft bonding, by the interaction with their vibrations. This interaction in these systems can be characterized by a few relevant electronic states that are coupled to numerous vibrational normal modes, encompassing a vast configurational space of the molecules. The full quantum simulation of these type of systems has been long dominated by the multiconfiguration time-dependent Hartree (MCTDH) approach and its multilayer variants, which are considered the gold standard in the presence of electron-vibration coupling with a large number of modes. Recently, also the matrix product state ansatz (MPS) with appropriate time-evolution schemes has been applied to these types of Hamiltonians. In this article, we provide a numerical comparison of excited-state dynamics between the MCTDH and MPS approaches for two electron-vibration coupled systems. Notably, we consider two models for exciton dissociation at a P3HT:PCBM heterojunction, comprising two electronic states and 100 vibrational modes, and 26 electronic states and 113 vibrational modes, respectively. While both methods agree very well for the first model, more pronounced deviations are found for the second model. We trace back the divergence between the methods to the different way entanglement is treated.

基质积态与多配置时变哈特里方法在激子解离非绝热动力学方面的比较。
有机分子、分子聚合体和供体-受体团簇的激发态动力学通常受电子激发的相互作用以及由于其柔性和软键而与振动的相互作用所支配。这些系统中的相互作用可以用几个相关的电子态来描述,这些电子态与众多振动法向模态相耦合,涵盖了分子的广阔构型空间。长期以来,多构型时间相关哈特里(Multiconfiguration time-dependent Hartree,MCTDH)方法及其多层变体一直主导着这类系统的全量子模拟,在存在大量模式的电子振动耦合时,它们被认为是黄金标准。最近,带有适当时间演化方案的矩阵积状态解析(MPS)也被应用于这些类型的哈密顿。在本文中,我们针对两个电子振动耦合系统,对 MCTDH 和 MPS 方法的激发态动力学进行了数值比较。值得注意的是,我们考虑了 P3HT:PCBM 异质结激子解离的两个模型,分别包括两个电子态和 100 个振动模式,以及 26 个电子态和 113 个振动模式。虽然两种方法在第一个模型上的结果非常一致,但在第二个模型上却发现了更明显的偏差。我们将两种方法之间的偏差追溯到处理纠缠的不同方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 化学-物理:原子、分子和化学物理
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
16.40%
发文量
568
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation invites new and original contributions with the understanding that, if accepted, they will not be published elsewhere. Papers reporting new theories, methodology, and/or important applications in quantum electronic structure, molecular dynamics, and statistical mechanics are appropriate for submission to this Journal. Specific topics include advances in or applications of ab initio quantum mechanics, density functional theory, design and properties of new materials, surface science, Monte Carlo simulations, solvation models, QM/MM calculations, biomolecular structure prediction, and molecular dynamics in the broadest sense including gas-phase dynamics, ab initio dynamics, biomolecular dynamics, and protein folding. The Journal does not consider papers that are straightforward applications of known methods including DFT and molecular dynamics. The Journal favors submissions that include advances in theory or methodology with applications to compelling problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信