Double standards in promotion and tenure

IF 21.4 1区心理学 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES

Nature Human Behaviour Pub Date : 2024-10-04 DOI:10.1038/s41562-024-01975-9

Damani White-Lewis

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite much anecdotal evidence, few studies show pervasive racial bias in promotion and tenure decisions. By analysing 1,571 real promotion and tenure cases across five US universities, Masters-Waage et al. find double standards negatively applied to scholars of colour, and especially women of colour, even after accounting for scholarly productivity.

Abstract Image

查看原文本刊更多论文

晋升和终身职位方面的双重标准

尽管有很多传闻证据，但很少有研究显示晋升和终身教职决定中普遍存在种族偏见。Masters-Waage 等人通过分析美国五所大学中 1571 个真实的晋升和终身教职案例，发现即使在考虑学术生产力之后，对有色人种学者，尤其是有色人种女性，也适用负面的双重标准。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Nature Human Behaviour Psychology-Social Psychology

CiteScore

36.80

自引率

1.00%

发文量

227

期刊介绍： Nature Human Behaviour is a journal that focuses on publishing research of outstanding significance into any aspect of human behavior.The research can cover various areas such as psychological, biological, and social bases of human behavior.It also includes the study of origins, development, and disorders related to human behavior.The primary aim of the journal is to increase the visibility of research in the field and enhance its societal reach and impact.