Previous exacerbations in newly diagnosed COPD patients: do they matter?

IF 16.6 1区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Carlos Cabrera López, Juan Marco Figueira-Gonçalves
{"title":"Previous exacerbations in newly diagnosed COPD patients: do they matter?","authors":"Carlos Cabrera López, Juan Marco Figueira-Gonçalves","doi":"10.1183/13993003.01019-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<sec><st>Extract</st>\n<p>The current Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) document defines a COPD patient at risk of an exacerbation as one who has had two or more moderate exacerbations (requiring systemic steroids or antibiotics) or at least one severe exacerbation (requiring hospitalisation) in the previous year [1]. This definition is based on the predictive risk of previous exacerbations in COPD patients with a long-established disease currently receiving medication (long-acting bronchodilators and inhaled corticosteroids (ICS)) [2]. In the 2024 document, the GOLD committee has, for the first time, proposed that newly diagnosed COPD patients with exacerbations could be eligible for triple inhaled therapy (long-acting &beta;<SUB>2</SUB>-agonist (LABA) with long-acting muscarinic antagonist and ICS) as their initial medication if they have more than 300 eosinophils per &mu;L of blood. However, there is little to no evidence on how newly diagnosed COPD patients progress in the year following their diagnosis, particularly concerning previous exacerbations. A knowledge gap exists regarding whether exacerbations in the previous year could predict future exacerbations in newly diagnosed COPD patients, as opposed to only those with established disease under chronic treatment. This could have therapeutic implications, as it would encourage more aggressive treatment for exacerbators from the time of diagnosis and might suggest reconsidering the necessity of waiting for a second exacerbation before initiating triple inhaled therapy, especially in patients who have a blood eosinophil count &gt;300&nbsp;&mu;L<sup>&ndash;1</sup>.</p>\n</sec>","PeriodicalId":12265,"journal":{"name":"European Respiratory Journal","volume":"78 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":16.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Respiratory Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01019-2024","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Extract

The current Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) document defines a COPD patient at risk of an exacerbation as one who has had two or more moderate exacerbations (requiring systemic steroids or antibiotics) or at least one severe exacerbation (requiring hospitalisation) in the previous year [1]. This definition is based on the predictive risk of previous exacerbations in COPD patients with a long-established disease currently receiving medication (long-acting bronchodilators and inhaled corticosteroids (ICS)) [2]. In the 2024 document, the GOLD committee has, for the first time, proposed that newly diagnosed COPD patients with exacerbations could be eligible for triple inhaled therapy (long-acting β2-agonist (LABA) with long-acting muscarinic antagonist and ICS) as their initial medication if they have more than 300 eosinophils per μL of blood. However, there is little to no evidence on how newly diagnosed COPD patients progress in the year following their diagnosis, particularly concerning previous exacerbations. A knowledge gap exists regarding whether exacerbations in the previous year could predict future exacerbations in newly diagnosed COPD patients, as opposed to only those with established disease under chronic treatment. This could have therapeutic implications, as it would encourage more aggressive treatment for exacerbators from the time of diagnosis and might suggest reconsidering the necessity of waiting for a second exacerbation before initiating triple inhaled therapy, especially in patients who have a blood eosinophil count >300 μL–1.

新诊断的慢性阻塞性肺病患者既往病情加重:这重要吗?
摘要目前的慢性阻塞性肺病全球倡议(GOLD)文件将有恶化风险的慢性阻塞性肺病患者定义为在过去一年中有过两次或两次以上中度恶化(需要使用全身类固醇或抗生素)或至少一次重度恶化(需要住院治疗)的患者[1]。这一定义是基于目前正在接受药物治疗(长效支气管扩张剂和吸入皮质类固醇(ICS))的慢性阻塞性肺疾病长期患者既往病情加重的预测风险[2]。在 2024 年的文件中,GOLD 委员会首次提出,新诊断的慢性阻塞性肺疾病加重期患者如果每升血液中嗜酸性粒细胞超过 300 个,就有资格接受三联吸入疗法(长效β2-受体激动剂(LABA)、长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂和 ICS)作为初始药物治疗。然而,关于新诊断的慢性阻塞性肺病患者在确诊后一年内的病情进展情况,尤其是与既往病情加重有关的情况,几乎没有任何证据。关于前一年的病情恶化是否可以预测新诊断的慢性阻塞性肺病患者未来的病情恶化,而不仅仅是那些已经确诊并正在接受慢性治疗的患者的病情恶化,目前还存在知识空白。这可能会对治疗产生影响,因为这将鼓励从诊断时起就对病情加重者进行更积极的治疗,并可能建议重新考虑是否有必要等待第二次病情加重后再开始三联吸入疗法,尤其是对于血液中嗜酸性粒细胞计数为 300>300 μL–1 的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Respiratory Journal
European Respiratory Journal 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
27.50
自引率
3.30%
发文量
345
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Respiratory Journal (ERJ) is the flagship journal of the European Respiratory Society. It has a current impact factor of 24.9. The journal covers various aspects of adult and paediatric respiratory medicine, including cell biology, epidemiology, immunology, oncology, pathophysiology, imaging, occupational medicine, intensive care, sleep medicine, and thoracic surgery. In addition to original research material, the ERJ publishes editorial commentaries, reviews, short research letters, and correspondence to the editor. The articles are published continuously and collected into 12 monthly issues in two volumes per year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信