B-047 A Rapid Host-Response Test Supports Antimicrobial Stewardship at a Micro-Hospital Emergency Department

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
B DuChateau, S Murphy, C Tarr, T Gottlieb, S Spies
{"title":"B-047 A Rapid Host-Response Test Supports Antimicrobial Stewardship at a Micro-Hospital Emergency Department","authors":"B DuChateau, S Murphy, C Tarr, T Gottlieb, S Spies","doi":"10.1093/clinchem/hvae106.409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background The management of patients with suspected infections requires identification of the infectious etiology to determine appropriate use of antibiotics. However, differentiating viral from bacterial infection (and co-infection) is often challenging as clinical presentations can be similar and existing diagnostics sometimes fail to identify a clinically relevant pathogen. A host-response test (MeMed BV®, MMBV) that relies on computational integration of three proteins (TRAIL, IP-10 and CRP) measured from blood or serum has demonstrated high diagnostic performance for differentiating bacterial from viral infections, with a negative predictive value >95% across multiple studies. This report evaluates real-world use of MMBV at a micro-hospital Emergency Department (ED) and associated antibiotic prescribing. Methods The study is a retrospective analysis of real-world data collected between January and June 2023. MMBV was ordered by providers at a micro-hospital ED in Tucson, AZ at provider discretion as part of routine care. Prescription among cases with MMBV score <35 was analyzed. This cutoff is indicated by the manufacturer to indicate a viral or other non-bacterial etiology. If an antibiotic was prescribed, the authors conducted a chart review to adjudicate whether the prescription was warranted. Results Data was evaluated between January and June 2023; 116 MMBV tests were ordered by six providers. Most tests (81.9% (95%CI: ±7.0%)) had an MMBV score <35 (mean score 11.3 with standard deviation 10.8). Among these, 92.6% (95%CI: ±5.3%) of cases with viral results were not prescribed antibiotics. MMBV use increased throughout the study period from 12 tests in the first month to 25 in the last month (r = 0.88; p<0.001). There were seven cases where providers chose to prescribe despite a viral MMBV result. Upon chart review, 2/7 were unwarranted prescriptions. Conclusions In the emergency settings, integrating MMBV can effectively guide clinical decision-making, potentially reducing unnecessary antibiotic use. Further research in diverse healthcare settings is needed to validate these findings.","PeriodicalId":10690,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry","volume":"74 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvae106.409","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background The management of patients with suspected infections requires identification of the infectious etiology to determine appropriate use of antibiotics. However, differentiating viral from bacterial infection (and co-infection) is often challenging as clinical presentations can be similar and existing diagnostics sometimes fail to identify a clinically relevant pathogen. A host-response test (MeMed BV®, MMBV) that relies on computational integration of three proteins (TRAIL, IP-10 and CRP) measured from blood or serum has demonstrated high diagnostic performance for differentiating bacterial from viral infections, with a negative predictive value >95% across multiple studies. This report evaluates real-world use of MMBV at a micro-hospital Emergency Department (ED) and associated antibiotic prescribing. Methods The study is a retrospective analysis of real-world data collected between January and June 2023. MMBV was ordered by providers at a micro-hospital ED in Tucson, AZ at provider discretion as part of routine care. Prescription among cases with MMBV score <35 was analyzed. This cutoff is indicated by the manufacturer to indicate a viral or other non-bacterial etiology. If an antibiotic was prescribed, the authors conducted a chart review to adjudicate whether the prescription was warranted. Results Data was evaluated between January and June 2023; 116 MMBV tests were ordered by six providers. Most tests (81.9% (95%CI: ±7.0%)) had an MMBV score <35 (mean score 11.3 with standard deviation 10.8). Among these, 92.6% (95%CI: ±5.3%) of cases with viral results were not prescribed antibiotics. MMBV use increased throughout the study period from 12 tests in the first month to 25 in the last month (r = 0.88; p<0.001). There were seven cases where providers chose to prescribe despite a viral MMBV result. Upon chart review, 2/7 were unwarranted prescriptions. Conclusions In the emergency settings, integrating MMBV can effectively guide clinical decision-making, potentially reducing unnecessary antibiotic use. Further research in diverse healthcare settings is needed to validate these findings.
B-047 快速宿主反应试验支持微型医院急诊科的抗菌药物管理
背景 对疑似感染患者的治疗需要确定感染病因,以决定抗生素的适当使用。然而,区分病毒感染和细菌感染(以及合并感染)往往具有挑战性,因为临床表现可能相似,而现有的诊断方法有时无法确定临床相关的病原体。一种宿主反应测试(MeMed BV®,MMBV)依赖于对血液或血清中测得的三种蛋白质(TRAIL、IP-10 和 CRP)的计算整合,在区分细菌和病毒感染方面具有很高的诊断性能,在多项研究中的阴性预测值高达 95%。本报告评估了一家微型医院急诊科(ED)使用 MMBV 的实际情况及相关抗生素处方。方法 该研究是对 2023 年 1 月至 6 月间收集的真实世界数据进行的回顾性分析。亚利桑那州图森市一家微型医院急诊科的医护人员将 MMBV 作为常规护理的一部分,酌情开具处方。分析了MMBV评分为<35的病例的处方情况。该分界线由生产商确定,用于指示病毒或其他非细菌病因。如果开具了抗生素处方,作者会进行病历审查,以判断处方是否合理。结果 对 2023 年 1 月至 6 月期间的数据进行了评估;六家医疗服务提供者共开具了 116 份 MMBV 检测单。大多数测试(81.9% (95%CI: ±7.0%))的 MMBV 得分为 <35 (平均分 11.3,标准差 10.8)。其中,92.6%(95%CI:±5.3%)的病毒感染病例未被处方抗生素。在整个研究期间,MMBV 的使用率从第一个月的 12 次增加到最后一个月的 25 次(r = 0.88;p<0.001)。在 7 个病例中,医疗服务提供者在 MMBV 检测结果为病毒的情况下仍选择开处方。经病历审查,2/7 的处方是不必要的。结论 在急诊环境中,整合 MMBV 可有效指导临床决策,从而减少不必要的抗生素使用。需要在不同的医疗环境中开展进一步研究,以验证这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical chemistry
Clinical chemistry 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
212
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Chemistry is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that is the premier publication for the science and practice of clinical laboratory medicine. It was established in 1955 and is associated with the Association for Diagnostics & Laboratory Medicine (ADLM). The journal focuses on laboratory diagnosis and management of patients, and has expanded to include other clinical laboratory disciplines such as genomics, hematology, microbiology, and toxicology. It also publishes articles relevant to clinical specialties including cardiology, endocrinology, gastroenterology, genetics, immunology, infectious diseases, maternal-fetal medicine, neurology, nutrition, oncology, and pediatrics. In addition to original research, editorials, and reviews, Clinical Chemistry features recurring sections such as clinical case studies, perspectives, podcasts, and Q&A articles. It has the highest impact factor among journals of clinical chemistry, laboratory medicine, pathology, analytical chemistry, transfusion medicine, and clinical microbiology. The journal is indexed in databases such as MEDLINE and Web of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信