The effects of cognitive-motor interference on walking performance in adolescents with low balance.

Benjamin David Weedon, Patrick Esser, Johnny Collett, Hooshang Izadi, Mario Inacio, Shawn Joshi, Andy Meaney, Anne Delextrat, Steve Kemp, Helen Dawes
{"title":"The effects of cognitive-motor interference on walking performance in adolescents with low balance.","authors":"Benjamin David Weedon, Patrick Esser, Johnny Collett, Hooshang Izadi, Mario Inacio, Shawn Joshi, Andy Meaney, Anne Delextrat, Steve Kemp, Helen Dawes","doi":"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2024.09.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Children with reduced motor competence (MC) have reported differences in their walking performance when compared to their typically developed peers, albeit, with inconsistent results.</p><p><strong>Research questions: </strong>What is the effect of reduced balance on walking performance in adolescent boys and girls under cognitive-motor interference conditions?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study assessed motor competence, in adolescents aged 13-14 years, using the Movement Assessment Battery for Children 2nd edition and walking performance from gait parameters derived from an inertial measurement unit placed over the estimated centre of mass. Each participant performed two 10 m straight-line walks at their self-selected speed. These consisted of a walk with no distractions and a cognitive-motor interference walk (reciting the alternate letters of the alphabet out loud). A two-way mixed ANOVA was used to assess for significant interactions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>365 adolescents, (low balance = 58, typical balance = 307) participated in this study (boys = 204, girls = 161). Significant interactions were reported between MC groups and walking condition for walking speed in boys (F<sub>(1,195)</sub> = 5.23, p= 0.02, η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.03) and girls (F<sub>(1,154)</sub> = 4.05, p= 0.046, η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.03). Both sexes with low balance reduced their walking speed to a greater extent than their typically developed peers under cognitive-motor interference conditions compared to the single-task walk. In addition, boys with low balance reported increased stride length variability (F<sub>(1,198)</sub>= 4.40, p= 0.037, η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup>= 0.02) compared to typically developed peers.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>Adolescents with low balance report altered walking. Our data could support a better understanding of the relationship between balance and gait and may help the development of interventions to support those with difficulties.</p>","PeriodicalId":94018,"journal":{"name":"Gait & posture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gait & posture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2024.09.016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Children with reduced motor competence (MC) have reported differences in their walking performance when compared to their typically developed peers, albeit, with inconsistent results.

Research questions: What is the effect of reduced balance on walking performance in adolescent boys and girls under cognitive-motor interference conditions?

Methods: This cross-sectional study assessed motor competence, in adolescents aged 13-14 years, using the Movement Assessment Battery for Children 2nd edition and walking performance from gait parameters derived from an inertial measurement unit placed over the estimated centre of mass. Each participant performed two 10 m straight-line walks at their self-selected speed. These consisted of a walk with no distractions and a cognitive-motor interference walk (reciting the alternate letters of the alphabet out loud). A two-way mixed ANOVA was used to assess for significant interactions.

Results: 365 adolescents, (low balance = 58, typical balance = 307) participated in this study (boys = 204, girls = 161). Significant interactions were reported between MC groups and walking condition for walking speed in boys (F(1,195) = 5.23, p= 0.02, ηp2 = 0.03) and girls (F(1,154) = 4.05, p= 0.046, ηp2 = 0.03). Both sexes with low balance reduced their walking speed to a greater extent than their typically developed peers under cognitive-motor interference conditions compared to the single-task walk. In addition, boys with low balance reported increased stride length variability (F(1,198)= 4.40, p= 0.037, ηp2= 0.02) compared to typically developed peers.

Significance: Adolescents with low balance report altered walking. Our data could support a better understanding of the relationship between balance and gait and may help the development of interventions to support those with difficulties.

认知运动干扰对平衡能力差的青少年行走能力的影响。
背景:据报道,运动能力(MC)下降的儿童与发育正常的同龄人相比,在行走表现上存在差异,尽管结果并不一致:研究问题:在认知-运动干扰条件下,平衡能力下降对青春期男孩和女孩的行走能力有何影响?这项横断面研究使用儿童运动评估电池第 2 版对 13-14 岁青少年的运动能力进行评估,并根据放置在估计质心上方的惯性测量装置得出的步态参数评估步行表现。每位受试者以自己选择的速度进行了两次 10 米直线行走。其中包括一次无干扰行走和一次认知运动干扰行走(大声背诵字母表中的交替字母)。采用双向混合方差分析来评估是否存在显著的交互作用:共有 365 名青少年(低平衡力 = 58 人,典型平衡力 = 307 人)参加了这项研究(男生 = 204 人,女生 = 161 人)。男生(F(1,195) = 5.23, p= 0.02, ηp2 = 0.03)和女生(F(1,154) = 4.05, p= 0.046, ηp2 = 0.03)的步行速度在 MC 组和步行条件之间存在显著的交互作用。与单任务步行相比,在认知-运动干扰条件下,平衡能力差的男女儿童比发育正常的同龄儿童更大程度地降低了步行速度。此外,与发育正常的同龄人相比,平衡能力差的男孩步长变异性增加(F(1,198)= 4.40,p= 0.037,ηp2= 0.02):重要意义:平衡能力差的青少年表示行走能力有所改变。我们的数据有助于更好地理解平衡与步态之间的关系,并有助于制定干预措施,为有困难的青少年提供支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信