21-Hydroxylase Deficiency Detected in Neonatal Screening: High Probability of False Negativity in Late Onset Form.

Jan David, Zuzana Hrubá, Hana Vinohradská, Monika Hedelová, Alena Fialová, Felix Votava
{"title":"21-Hydroxylase Deficiency Detected in Neonatal Screening: High Probability of False Negativity in Late Onset Form.","authors":"Jan David, Zuzana Hrubá, Hana Vinohradská, Monika Hedelová, Alena Fialová, Felix Votava","doi":"10.1055/a-2433-0891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Despite the high sensitivity of neonatal screening in detecting the classical form of congenital adrenal hyperplasia due to 21-hydroxylase deficiency, one of the unclear issues is identifying asymptomatic children with late onset forms. The aim of this nationwide study was to analyse the association between genotype and screened level of 17-hydroxyprogesterone in patients with the late onset form of 21-hydroxylase deficiency and to quantify false negativity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the Czech Republic, 1,866,129 neonates were screened (2006-2022). Among this cohort, 159 patients were confirmed to suffer from 21-hydroxylase deficiency, employing the 17-hydroxyprogesterone birthweight/gestational age-adjusted cut-off limits, and followed by the genetic confirmation. The screening prevalence was 1:11,737. Another 57 patients who were false negative in neonatal screening were added to this cohort based on later diagnosis by clinical suspicion. To our knowledge, such a huge nationwide cohort of false negative patients has not been documented before.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 57 patients escaped from neonatal screening in the monitored period. All false negative patients had milder forms. Only one patient had simple virilising form and 56 patients had the late onset form. The probability of false negativity in the late onset form was 76.7%. The difference in 17-hydroxyprogesterone screening values was statistically significant (p<0.001) between severe forms (median 478.8 nmol/L) and milder (36.2 nmol/L) forms. Interestingly, the higher proportion of females with milder forms was statistically significant compared with the general population.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A negative neonatal screening result does not exclude milder forms of 21-hydroxylase deficiency during the differential diagnostic procedure of children with precocious pseudopuberty.</p>","PeriodicalId":94001,"journal":{"name":"Experimental and clinical endocrinology & diabetes : official journal, German Society of Endocrinology [and] German Diabetes Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental and clinical endocrinology & diabetes : official journal, German Society of Endocrinology [and] German Diabetes Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2433-0891","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Despite the high sensitivity of neonatal screening in detecting the classical form of congenital adrenal hyperplasia due to 21-hydroxylase deficiency, one of the unclear issues is identifying asymptomatic children with late onset forms. The aim of this nationwide study was to analyse the association between genotype and screened level of 17-hydroxyprogesterone in patients with the late onset form of 21-hydroxylase deficiency and to quantify false negativity.

Methods: In the Czech Republic, 1,866,129 neonates were screened (2006-2022). Among this cohort, 159 patients were confirmed to suffer from 21-hydroxylase deficiency, employing the 17-hydroxyprogesterone birthweight/gestational age-adjusted cut-off limits, and followed by the genetic confirmation. The screening prevalence was 1:11,737. Another 57 patients who were false negative in neonatal screening were added to this cohort based on later diagnosis by clinical suspicion. To our knowledge, such a huge nationwide cohort of false negative patients has not been documented before.

Results: Overall, 57 patients escaped from neonatal screening in the monitored period. All false negative patients had milder forms. Only one patient had simple virilising form and 56 patients had the late onset form. The probability of false negativity in the late onset form was 76.7%. The difference in 17-hydroxyprogesterone screening values was statistically significant (p<0.001) between severe forms (median 478.8 nmol/L) and milder (36.2 nmol/L) forms. Interestingly, the higher proportion of females with milder forms was statistically significant compared with the general population.

Conclusions: A negative neonatal screening result does not exclude milder forms of 21-hydroxylase deficiency during the differential diagnostic procedure of children with precocious pseudopuberty.

新生儿筛查中发现的 21- 羟化酶缺乏症:晚发型的假阴性概率很高。
目的:尽管新生儿筛查在检测由 21- 羟基酶缺乏症引起的典型先天性肾上腺皮质增生症方面具有很高的灵敏度,但其中一个不明确的问题是如何识别无症状的晚发型儿童。这项全国性研究旨在分析 21-羟化酶缺乏症晚发型患者的基因型与筛查出的 17-羟孕酮水平之间的关系,并量化假阴性:在捷克共和国,共筛查了 1,866,129 名新生儿(2006-2022 年)。其中,159 名患者通过 17- 羟基孕酮出生体重/孕龄调整临界值确认患有 21- 羟基酶缺乏症,随后进行了基因确认。筛查率为 1:11,737。另有 57 名在新生儿筛查中呈假阴性的患者,根据后来的临床怀疑诊断结果被加入到这一队列中。据我们所知,如此庞大的全国假阴性患者队列以前从未有过记录:结果:在监测期间,共有 57 名患者未通过新生儿筛查。所有假阴性患者的病情都较轻。只有一名患者为单纯男性化,56 名患者为晚发型。晚发型假阴性的概率为 76.7%。严重型(中位数为 478.8 nmol/L)与较轻型(36.2 nmol/L)之间的 17- 羟孕酮筛查值差异具有统计学意义(p < 0.001)。有趣的是,与普通人群相比,病情较轻的女性比例较高,这在统计学上具有显著意义:结论:在对假性性早熟儿童进行鉴别诊断时,新生儿筛查结果呈阴性并不能排除较轻的 21- 羟化酶缺乏症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信