Admission chest CT scan of intensive care patients with interstitial lung disease: Unveiling its limited predictive value through visual and automated analyses in a retrospective study (ILDICTO)

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Vincent Joussellin , Eric Meneyrol , Mathieu Lederlin , Stéphane Jouneau , Nicolas Terzi , Jean-Marc Tadié , Arnaud Gacouin
{"title":"Admission chest CT scan of intensive care patients with interstitial lung disease: Unveiling its limited predictive value through visual and automated analyses in a retrospective study (ILDICTO)","authors":"Vincent Joussellin ,&nbsp;Eric Meneyrol ,&nbsp;Mathieu Lederlin ,&nbsp;Stéphane Jouneau ,&nbsp;Nicolas Terzi ,&nbsp;Jean-Marc Tadié ,&nbsp;Arnaud Gacouin","doi":"10.1016/j.resmer.2024.101140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Clinical course prediction of patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for acute respiratory failure (ARF) can be challenging. This study aimed to characterize the prognostic value of admission chest CT-scan in this situation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively included ILD patients admitted to a French ICU for acute respiratory failure requiring oxygen. Patients with lymphangitis carcinomatosis and ANCA vasculitis were excluded. We analyzed every admission chest CT-scan using two different approaches: a visual analysis (grading the extent of traction bronchiectasis, ground glass and honeycomb) and an automated analysis (grading the extent of ground glass and consolidation with a dedicated software). The primary outcome was ICU mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Between January 2014 and October 2020, 81 patients presented an acute respiratory failure with ILD on the admission chest CT-scan. In univariate analysis, only the main pulmonary artery diameter differed between patients who survived and those who died in ICU (30 vs 32 mm, <em>p</em> = 0.021). In multivariate analysis, none of the radiological funding was associated with ICU mortality. Visual and automated analyses did not yield different results, with a strong correlation between the two methods. However, the identification of an UIP pattern (and the presence of honeycomb) was associated with a poorer response to corticosteroid therapy.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our study showed that the extent of radiological findings and the severity of fibrosis indices on admission chest CT scans of ILD patients admitted to the ICU for ARF were not associated with subsequent deterioration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48479,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory Medicine and Research","volume":"86 ","pages":"Article 101140"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory Medicine and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590041224000564","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Clinical course prediction of patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for acute respiratory failure (ARF) can be challenging. This study aimed to characterize the prognostic value of admission chest CT-scan in this situation.

Methods

We retrospectively included ILD patients admitted to a French ICU for acute respiratory failure requiring oxygen. Patients with lymphangitis carcinomatosis and ANCA vasculitis were excluded. We analyzed every admission chest CT-scan using two different approaches: a visual analysis (grading the extent of traction bronchiectasis, ground glass and honeycomb) and an automated analysis (grading the extent of ground glass and consolidation with a dedicated software). The primary outcome was ICU mortality.

Results

Between January 2014 and October 2020, 81 patients presented an acute respiratory failure with ILD on the admission chest CT-scan. In univariate analysis, only the main pulmonary artery diameter differed between patients who survived and those who died in ICU (30 vs 32 mm, p = 0.021). In multivariate analysis, none of the radiological funding was associated with ICU mortality. Visual and automated analyses did not yield different results, with a strong correlation between the two methods. However, the identification of an UIP pattern (and the presence of honeycomb) was associated with a poorer response to corticosteroid therapy.

Conclusion

Our study showed that the extent of radiological findings and the severity of fibrosis indices on admission chest CT scans of ILD patients admitted to the ICU for ARF were not associated with subsequent deterioration.
重症监护患者间质性肺病的入院胸部 CT 扫描:在一项回顾性研究(ILDICTO)中,通过视觉和自动分析揭示其有限的预测价值。
背景:因急性呼吸衰竭(ARF)入住重症监护室(ICU)的间质性肺病(ILD)患者的临床病程预测可能具有挑战性。本研究旨在确定入院胸部 CT 扫描在这种情况下的预后价值:我们回顾性地纳入了因急性呼吸衰竭需要吸氧而入住法国一家重症监护室的 ILD 患者。淋巴管癌变和 ANCA 血管炎患者除外。我们使用两种不同的方法分析了每张入院胸部 CT 扫描图像:目视分析(对牵引性支气管扩张、磨玻璃和蜂窝的程度进行分级)和自动分析(使用专用软件对磨玻璃和合并的程度进行分级)。主要结果是重症监护病房死亡率:结果:2014 年 1 月至 2020 年 10 月间,81 名患者在入院胸部 CT 扫描中发现急性呼吸衰竭并伴有 ILD。在单变量分析中,只有主肺动脉直径在存活患者和重症监护室死亡患者之间存在差异(30 毫米对 32 毫米,P = 0.021)。在多变量分析中,没有一项放射学指标与 ICU 死亡率相关。目视分析和自动分析的结果并无不同,两种方法之间有很强的相关性。然而,UIP模式的识别(以及蜂窝的存在)与对皮质类固醇治疗的较差反应有关:我们的研究表明,因 ARF 而入住重症监护室的 ILD 患者入院胸部 CT 扫描的放射学发现范围和纤维化指数的严重程度与随后的病情恶化无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Respiratory Medicine and Research
Respiratory Medicine and Research RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
50 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信