Early Caregiver Predictability Shapes Neural Indices of Statistical Learning Later in Infancy

IF 3.1 1区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Tess Allegra Forest, Sarah A. McCormick, Lauren Davel, Nwabisa Mlandu, Michal R. Zieff, Khula South Africa Data Collection Team, Dima Amso, Kirsty A. Donald, Laurel Joy Gabard-Durnam
{"title":"Early Caregiver Predictability Shapes Neural Indices of Statistical Learning Later in Infancy","authors":"Tess Allegra Forest,&nbsp;Sarah A. McCormick,&nbsp;Lauren Davel,&nbsp;Nwabisa Mlandu,&nbsp;Michal R. Zieff,&nbsp;Khula South Africa Data Collection Team,&nbsp;Dima Amso,&nbsp;Kirsty A. Donald,&nbsp;Laurel Joy Gabard-Durnam","doi":"10.1111/desc.13570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Caregivers play an outsized role in shaping early life experiences and development, but we often lack mechanistic insight into <i>how</i> exactly caregiver behavior scaffolds the neurodevelopment of specific learning processes. Here, we capitalized on the fact that caregivers differ in how predictable their behavior is to ask if infants’ early environmental input shapes their brains’ later ability to learn about predictable information. As part of an ongoing longitudinal study in South Africa, we recorded naturalistic, dyadic interactions between 103 (46 females and 57 males) infants and their primary caregivers at 3–6 months of age, from which we calculated the predictability of caregivers’ behavior, following caregiver vocalization and overall. When the same infants were 6–12-months-old they participated in an auditory statistical learning task during EEG. We found evidence of learning-related change in infants’ neural responses to predictable information during the statistical learning task. The magnitude of statistical learning-related change in infants’ EEG responses was associated with the predictability of their caregiver's vocalizations several months earlier, such that infants with more predictable caregiver vocalization patterns showed more evidence of statistical learning later in the first year of life. These results suggest that early experiences with caregiver predictability influence learning, providing support for the hypothesis that the neurodevelopment of core learning and memory systems is closely tied to infants’ experiences during key developmental windows.</p>","PeriodicalId":48392,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Science","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/desc.13570","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/desc.13570","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Caregivers play an outsized role in shaping early life experiences and development, but we often lack mechanistic insight into how exactly caregiver behavior scaffolds the neurodevelopment of specific learning processes. Here, we capitalized on the fact that caregivers differ in how predictable their behavior is to ask if infants’ early environmental input shapes their brains’ later ability to learn about predictable information. As part of an ongoing longitudinal study in South Africa, we recorded naturalistic, dyadic interactions between 103 (46 females and 57 males) infants and their primary caregivers at 3–6 months of age, from which we calculated the predictability of caregivers’ behavior, following caregiver vocalization and overall. When the same infants were 6–12-months-old they participated in an auditory statistical learning task during EEG. We found evidence of learning-related change in infants’ neural responses to predictable information during the statistical learning task. The magnitude of statistical learning-related change in infants’ EEG responses was associated with the predictability of their caregiver's vocalizations several months earlier, such that infants with more predictable caregiver vocalization patterns showed more evidence of statistical learning later in the first year of life. These results suggest that early experiences with caregiver predictability influence learning, providing support for the hypothesis that the neurodevelopment of core learning and memory systems is closely tied to infants’ experiences during key developmental windows.

Abstract Image

早期照料者的可预测性会影响婴儿后期统计学习的神经指标。
看护者在塑造婴儿早期生活经历和发展方面发挥着重要作用,但我们往往缺乏对看护者行为如何确切地支撑特定学习过程的神经发展的机制性洞察。在这里,我们利用照顾者行为的可预测性不同这一事实,来探究婴儿的早期环境输入是否会影响他们大脑日后学习可预测信息的能力。作为南非一项正在进行的纵向研究的一部分,我们记录了 103 名婴儿(46 名女性和 57 名男性)在 3-6 个月大时与他们的主要照顾者之间的自然、双人互动,并根据照顾者的发声和总体情况计算出照顾者行为的可预测性。这些婴儿在 6-12 个月大时参加了脑电图听觉统计学习任务。我们发现,在统计学习任务中,婴儿对可预测信息的神经反应发生了与学习相关的变化。婴儿脑电图反应中与统计学习相关的变化幅度与几个月前照料者发声的可预测性有关,因此,照料者发声模式可预测性较高的婴儿在出生后第一年的晚些时候表现出更多的统计学习证据。这些结果表明,照顾者可预测性的早期经历会影响婴儿的学习,从而为核心学习和记忆系统的神经发育与婴儿在关键发育窗口期的经历密切相关这一假设提供了支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
8.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: Developmental Science publishes cutting-edge theory and up-to-the-minute research on scientific developmental psychology from leading thinkers in the field. It is currently the only journal that specifically focuses on human developmental cognitive neuroscience. Coverage includes: - Clinical, computational and comparative approaches to development - Key advances in cognitive and social development - Developmental cognitive neuroscience - Functional neuroimaging of the developing brain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信