Social determinants of unmet need for primary care: a systematic review.

IF 6.3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Feben W Alemu, Jane Yuan, Seth Kadish, Surim Son, Sunbal Salim Khan, Safa M Nulla, Kathryn Nicholson, Piotr Wilk, Jane S Thornton, Shehzad Ali
{"title":"Social determinants of unmet need for primary care: a systematic review.","authors":"Feben W Alemu, Jane Yuan, Seth Kadish, Surim Son, Sunbal Salim Khan, Safa M Nulla, Kathryn Nicholson, Piotr Wilk, Jane S Thornton, Shehzad Ali","doi":"10.1186/s13643-024-02647-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite primary care being largely free at the point of delivery, many Canadians experience challenges in accessing the services they need. A systematic review was conducted to summarize the evidence on the level of unmet need for primary care in Canada and its social determinants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases were screened from inception to December 2023 using relevant search terms for primary care and unmet healthcare needs. Quantitative observational studies in the English language that included Canadian adults aged 18 years and older and focused on unmet needs for primary care were included. The risk of bias in the studies was assessed using either the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklist or the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The included studies were synthesized narratively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-six studies met the inclusion criteria for this review. Of the included studies, 96% were cross-sectional in design and 91% had low risk of bias. The prevalence of unmet need, mostly self-reported, varied between 6.6% and 25.2% in national studies. Social determinants of unmet needs were heterogeneous across studies. Findings suggest that unmet need for primary care is related to having low income, mental health diagnoses, and chronic conditions, and negatively associated with older age, having better-perceived health, and having a family physician.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Universal access to primary care is the founding principle of the Canadian healthcare system. However, we found evidence suggesting that the extent to which primary care needs are met is influenced by social determinants of health. Further research is needed to improve our understanding of the mechanisms of unmet primary care needs in Canada.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42021285074.</p>","PeriodicalId":22162,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews","volume":"13 1","pages":"252"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11448019/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-02647-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite primary care being largely free at the point of delivery, many Canadians experience challenges in accessing the services they need. A systematic review was conducted to summarize the evidence on the level of unmet need for primary care in Canada and its social determinants.

Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases were screened from inception to December 2023 using relevant search terms for primary care and unmet healthcare needs. Quantitative observational studies in the English language that included Canadian adults aged 18 years and older and focused on unmet needs for primary care were included. The risk of bias in the studies was assessed using either the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklist or the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The included studies were synthesized narratively.

Results: Forty-six studies met the inclusion criteria for this review. Of the included studies, 96% were cross-sectional in design and 91% had low risk of bias. The prevalence of unmet need, mostly self-reported, varied between 6.6% and 25.2% in national studies. Social determinants of unmet needs were heterogeneous across studies. Findings suggest that unmet need for primary care is related to having low income, mental health diagnoses, and chronic conditions, and negatively associated with older age, having better-perceived health, and having a family physician.

Conclusions: Universal access to primary care is the founding principle of the Canadian healthcare system. However, we found evidence suggesting that the extent to which primary care needs are met is influenced by social determinants of health. Further research is needed to improve our understanding of the mechanisms of unmet primary care needs in Canada.

Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42021285074.

未满足初级保健需求的社会决定因素:系统综述。
背景:尽管初级医疗在很大程度上是免费提供的,但许多加拿大人在获得所需服务方面仍面临挑战。我们进行了一项系统性综述,总结了有关加拿大初级医疗需求未得到满足的程度及其社会决定因素的证据:方法:使用初级保健和未满足的医疗保健需求的相关检索词,对 MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane 和 Web of Science 数据库从开始到 2023 年 12 月进行了筛选。研究纳入了包括 18 岁及以上加拿大成年人在内的英语定量观察性研究,这些研究重点关注未满足的初级保健需求。研究的偏倚风险采用乔安娜-布里格斯研究所(Joanna Briggs Institute,JBI)批判性评估清单或纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表进行评估。对纳入的研究进行了叙述性综合:结果:46 项研究符合本综述的纳入标准。在纳入的研究中,96%为横断面设计,91%的偏倚风险较低。在全国性研究中,未满足需求的发生率介于 6.6% 和 25.2% 之间,大部分为自我报告。在各项研究中,未满足需求的社会决定因素各不相同。研究结果表明,未满足的初级保健需求与低收入、精神健康诊断和慢性病有关,与年龄较大、健康状况较好和有家庭医生呈负相关:普及初级医疗服务是加拿大医疗体系的基本原则。然而,我们发现有证据表明,初级医疗需求的满足程度受到健康的社会决定因素的影响。我们需要进一步开展研究,以加深对加拿大初级医疗需求未得到满足的机制的了解:系统综述注册:PREMCORD42021285074。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Systematic Reviews
Systematic Reviews Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
241
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Systematic Reviews encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. At this time Systematic Reviews does not accept reviews of in vitro studies. The journal also aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted systematic reviews are published, regardless of their outcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信