An easier life to come for mosquito researchers: field-testing across Italy supports VECTRACK system for automatic counting, identification and absolute density estimation of Aedes albopictus and Culex pipiens adults.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 PARASITOLOGY
Martina Micocci, Mattia Manica, Ilaria Bernardini, Laura Soresinetti, Marianna Varone, Paola Di Lillo, Beniamino Caputo, Piero Poletti, Francesco Severini, Fabrizio Montarsi, Sara Epis, Marco Salvemini, Alessandra Della Torre
{"title":"An easier life to come for mosquito researchers: field-testing across Italy supports VECTRACK system for automatic counting, identification and absolute density estimation of Aedes albopictus and Culex pipiens adults.","authors":"Martina Micocci, Mattia Manica, Ilaria Bernardini, Laura Soresinetti, Marianna Varone, Paola Di Lillo, Beniamino Caputo, Piero Poletti, Francesco Severini, Fabrizio Montarsi, Sara Epis, Marco Salvemini, Alessandra Della Torre","doi":"10.1186/s13071-024-06479-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Disease-vector mosquito monitoring is an essential prerequisite to optimize control interventions and evidence-based risk predictions. However, conventional entomological monitoring methods are labor- and time-consuming and do not allow high temporal/spatial resolution. In 2022, a novel system coupling an optical sensor with machine learning technologies (VECTRACK) proved effective in counting and identifying Aedes albopictus and Culex pipiens adult females and males. Here, we carried out the first extensive field evaluation of the VECTRACK system to assess: (i) whether the catching capacity of a commercial BG-Mosquitaire trap (BGM) for adult mosquito equipped with VECTRACK (BGM + VECT) was affected by the sensor; (ii) the accuracy of the VECTRACK algorithm in correctly classifying the target mosquito species genus and sex; (iii) Ae. albopictus capture rate of BGM with or without VECTRACK.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The same experimental design was implemented in four areas in northern (Bergamo and Padua districts), central (Rome) and southern (Procida Island, Naples) Italy. In each area, three types of traps-one BGM, one BGM + VECT and the combination of four sticky traps (STs)-were rotated each 48 h in three different sites. Each sampling scheme was replicated three times/area. Collected mosquitoes were counted and identified by both the VECTRACK algorithm and operator-mediated morphological examination. The performance of the VECTRACK system was assessed by generalized linear mixed and linear regression models. Aedes albopictus capture rates of BGMs were calculated based on the known capture rate of ST.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3829 mosquitoes (90.2% Ae. albopictus) were captured in 18 collection-days/trap/site. BGM and BGM + VECT showed a similar performance in collecting target mosquitoes. Results show high correlation between visual and automatic identification methods (Spearman Ae. albopictus: females = 0.97; males = 0.89; P < 0.0001) and low count errors. Moreover, the results allowed quantifying the heterogeneous effectiveness associated with different trap types in collecting Ae. albopictus and predicting estimates of its absolute density.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Obtained results strongly support the VECTRACK system as a powerful tool for mosquito monitoring and research, and its applicability over a range of ecological conditions, accounting for its high potential for continuous monitoring with minimal human effort.</p>","PeriodicalId":19793,"journal":{"name":"Parasites & Vectors","volume":"17 1","pages":"409"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11448096/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Parasites & Vectors","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-024-06479-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PARASITOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Disease-vector mosquito monitoring is an essential prerequisite to optimize control interventions and evidence-based risk predictions. However, conventional entomological monitoring methods are labor- and time-consuming and do not allow high temporal/spatial resolution. In 2022, a novel system coupling an optical sensor with machine learning technologies (VECTRACK) proved effective in counting and identifying Aedes albopictus and Culex pipiens adult females and males. Here, we carried out the first extensive field evaluation of the VECTRACK system to assess: (i) whether the catching capacity of a commercial BG-Mosquitaire trap (BGM) for adult mosquito equipped with VECTRACK (BGM + VECT) was affected by the sensor; (ii) the accuracy of the VECTRACK algorithm in correctly classifying the target mosquito species genus and sex; (iii) Ae. albopictus capture rate of BGM with or without VECTRACK.

Methods: The same experimental design was implemented in four areas in northern (Bergamo and Padua districts), central (Rome) and southern (Procida Island, Naples) Italy. In each area, three types of traps-one BGM, one BGM + VECT and the combination of four sticky traps (STs)-were rotated each 48 h in three different sites. Each sampling scheme was replicated three times/area. Collected mosquitoes were counted and identified by both the VECTRACK algorithm and operator-mediated morphological examination. The performance of the VECTRACK system was assessed by generalized linear mixed and linear regression models. Aedes albopictus capture rates of BGMs were calculated based on the known capture rate of ST.

Results: A total of 3829 mosquitoes (90.2% Ae. albopictus) were captured in 18 collection-days/trap/site. BGM and BGM + VECT showed a similar performance in collecting target mosquitoes. Results show high correlation between visual and automatic identification methods (Spearman Ae. albopictus: females = 0.97; males = 0.89; P < 0.0001) and low count errors. Moreover, the results allowed quantifying the heterogeneous effectiveness associated with different trap types in collecting Ae. albopictus and predicting estimates of its absolute density.

Conclusions: Obtained results strongly support the VECTRACK system as a powerful tool for mosquito monitoring and research, and its applicability over a range of ecological conditions, accounting for its high potential for continuous monitoring with minimal human effort.

为蚊虫研究人员带来更轻松的生活:在意大利进行的实地测试支持 VECTRACK 系统对白纹伊蚊和库蚊成虫进行自动计数、识别和绝对密度估算。
背景:疾病媒介蚊虫监测是优化控制干预措施和循证风险预测的必要前提。然而,传统的昆虫学监测方法费时费力,而且时间/空间分辨率不高。2022 年,一种将光学传感器与机器学习技术相结合的新型系统(VECTRACK)被证明能有效计数和识别白纹伊蚊和琵鹭库蚊雌、雄成虫。在此,我们对 VECTRACK 系统进行了首次广泛的实地评估,以评估:(i) 装有 VECTRACK(BGM + VECT)的商用 BG-Mosquitaire 诱捕器(BGM)捕捉成蚊的能力是否受传感器的影响;(ii) VECTRACK 算法在正确划分目标蚊子种类属和性别方面的准确性;(iii) 装有或未装有 VECTRACK 的 BGM 的白纹伊蚊捕获率:在意大利北部(贝加莫和帕多瓦区)、中部(罗马)和南部(普罗奇达岛、那不勒斯)的四个地区实施了相同的实验设计。在每个地区,三种类型的诱捕器--一种 BGM、一种 BGM + VECT 和四种粘性诱捕器(ST)--在三个不同地点每 48 小时轮换一次。每种取样方案在每个地区重复三次。收集到的蚊子通过 VECTRACK 算法和操作员的形态检查进行计数和鉴定。VECTRACK 系统的性能通过广义线性混合模型和线性回归模型进行评估。根据 ST 的已知捕获率计算白纹伊蚊对 BGM 的捕获率:结果:在 18 个采集日/陷阱/地点共捕获了 3829 只蚊子(90.2% 为白纹伊蚊)。BGM 和 BGM + VECT 在收集目标蚊子方面表现相似。结果表明,视觉识别方法与自动识别方法之间具有很高的相关性(Spearman 白蚊:雌性 = 0.97;雄性 = 0.89;P 结论):获得的结果有力地证明了 VECTRACK 系统是监测和研究蚊虫的有力工具,适用于各种生态条件,具有以最小的人力进行连续监测的巨大潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Parasites & Vectors
Parasites & Vectors 医学-寄生虫学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
9.40%
发文量
433
审稿时长
1.4 months
期刊介绍: Parasites & Vectors is an open access, peer-reviewed online journal dealing with the biology of parasites, parasitic diseases, intermediate hosts, vectors and vector-borne pathogens. Manuscripts published in this journal will be available to all worldwide, with no barriers to access, immediately following acceptance. However, authors retain the copyright of their material and may use it, or distribute it, as they wish. Manuscripts on all aspects of the basic and applied biology of parasites, intermediate hosts, vectors and vector-borne pathogens will be considered. In addition to the traditional and well-established areas of science in these fields, we also aim to provide a vehicle for publication of the rapidly developing resources and technology in parasite, intermediate host and vector genomics and their impacts on biological research. We are able to publish large datasets and extensive results, frequently associated with genomic and post-genomic technologies, which are not readily accommodated in traditional journals. Manuscripts addressing broader issues, for example economics, social sciences and global climate change in relation to parasites, vectors and disease control, are also welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信