Physical Health Among Black Immigrants by Region of Birth: A Test of the Racial Context Hypothesis.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Oluwaseun T Emoruwa, Gabe H Miller, Gbenga I Elufisan, Guadalupe Marquez-Velarde, David Ademule, Hannah M Lindl, Olusola A Omisakin, Guizhen Ma, Stephanie M Hernandez, Verna M Keith
{"title":"Physical Health Among Black Immigrants by Region of Birth: A Test of the Racial Context Hypothesis.","authors":"Oluwaseun T Emoruwa, Gabe H Miller, Gbenga I Elufisan, Guadalupe Marquez-Velarde, David Ademule, Hannah M Lindl, Olusola A Omisakin, Guizhen Ma, Stephanie M Hernandez, Verna M Keith","doi":"10.1007/s40615-024-02167-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We test the Racial Context Hypothesis by examining the association between racial context of origin and five physical health outcomes (self-rated health, activity limitation, functional activity limitation, lifetime hypertension, and lifetime cancer) among U.S.-born Black Americans and Black immigrants in the United States.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This cross-sectional study used 2000 through 2018 waves of the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). Our subsample was limited to adults 18 years of age or older who self-identified as Black and selected a distinct global region of birth if not U.S. born (N = 212,269). We employed zero-order logistic regression models to estimate the relationships between each measure of health and racial context by region of birth.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Supporting the Racial Context Hypothesis, we found Black immigrants from racially mixed (Mexico, Central America, the Caribbean, South America) and majority-Black contexts (Africa) had lower odds of being in fair or poor self-rated health [aOR 0.786; 0.616; 0.611], reporting any activity limitation [aOR = 0.537; 0.369; 0.678], reporting functional activity limitation [aOR 0.619; 0.425; 0.678], reporting lifetime hypertension diagnosis [aOR 0.596; 0.543; 0.618], and reporting lifetime cancer diagnosis [aOR 0.771; 0.326; 0.641] compared to U.S.-born Black Americans. After controlling for sociodemographic and socioeconomic covariates, Black immigrants from majority-White contexts (Europe) did not significantly differ from U.S.-born Black Americans on these five physical health measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study expands our understanding of the \"Black immigrant advantage\" by showing that Black immigrants from predominantly Black and racially mixed regions rated their health status as poor or fair less often, experienced less activity or functional activity limitations, and had a lower risk of lifetime hypertension and cancer compared to U.S.-born Black Americans. The significant associations persisted even after controlling for sociodemographic and socioeconomic characteristics. Black immigrant health is not homogenous, and the racial context of origin Black immigrants come from has an association with their health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16921,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-024-02167-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We test the Racial Context Hypothesis by examining the association between racial context of origin and five physical health outcomes (self-rated health, activity limitation, functional activity limitation, lifetime hypertension, and lifetime cancer) among U.S.-born Black Americans and Black immigrants in the United States.

Design: This cross-sectional study used 2000 through 2018 waves of the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). Our subsample was limited to adults 18 years of age or older who self-identified as Black and selected a distinct global region of birth if not U.S. born (N = 212,269). We employed zero-order logistic regression models to estimate the relationships between each measure of health and racial context by region of birth.

Results: Supporting the Racial Context Hypothesis, we found Black immigrants from racially mixed (Mexico, Central America, the Caribbean, South America) and majority-Black contexts (Africa) had lower odds of being in fair or poor self-rated health [aOR 0.786; 0.616; 0.611], reporting any activity limitation [aOR = 0.537; 0.369; 0.678], reporting functional activity limitation [aOR 0.619; 0.425; 0.678], reporting lifetime hypertension diagnosis [aOR 0.596; 0.543; 0.618], and reporting lifetime cancer diagnosis [aOR 0.771; 0.326; 0.641] compared to U.S.-born Black Americans. After controlling for sociodemographic and socioeconomic covariates, Black immigrants from majority-White contexts (Europe) did not significantly differ from U.S.-born Black Americans on these five physical health measures.

Conclusion: This study expands our understanding of the "Black immigrant advantage" by showing that Black immigrants from predominantly Black and racially mixed regions rated their health status as poor or fair less often, experienced less activity or functional activity limitations, and had a lower risk of lifetime hypertension and cancer compared to U.S.-born Black Americans. The significant associations persisted even after controlling for sociodemographic and socioeconomic characteristics. Black immigrant health is not homogenous, and the racial context of origin Black immigrants come from has an association with their health outcomes.

按出生地区划分的黑人移民的身体健康状况:种族背景假设检验》。
目的我们通过研究在美国出生的美国黑人和美国黑人移民的原籍种族背景与五种身体健康结果(自评健康、活动受限、功能性活动受限、终生高血压和终生癌症)之间的关联来验证种族背景假说:这项横断面研究使用了 2000 年至 2018 年的全国健康访谈调查(NHIS)。我们的子样本仅限于自我认同为黑人的 18 岁或以上成年人,如果不是在美国出生,则选择一个不同的全球出生地区(N = 212,269 人)。我们采用零阶逻辑回归模型来估计出生地区的各项健康指标与种族背景之间的关系:结果:支持种族背景假说,我们发现来自种族混杂(墨西哥、中美洲、加勒比海、南美洲)和黑人占多数(非洲)背景的黑人移民自我评定健康状况为 "一般 "或 "差 "的几率较低[aOR 0.786; 0.616; 0.611]。611]、报告任何活动受限[aOR = 0.537; 0.369; 0.678]、报告功能性活动受限[aOR 0.619; 0.425; 0.678]、报告终生高血压诊断[aOR 0.596; 0.543; 0.618]和报告终生癌症诊断[aOR 0.771; 0.326; 0.641]。出生的美国黑人相比。在控制了社会人口和社会经济协变量后,来自白人占多数的环境(欧洲)的黑人移民在这五项身体健康指标上与美国出生的美国黑人没有显著差异:这项研究表明,与在美国出生的美国黑人相比,来自以黑人为主和种族混居地区的黑人移民较少将自己的健康状况评为较差或一般,活动或功能活动受限较少,终生罹患高血压和癌症的风险较低,从而扩展了我们对 "黑人移民优势 "的理解。即使在控制了社会人口和社会经济特征后,这些明显的关联仍然存在。黑人移民的健康状况并非千篇一律,黑人移民的原籍种族背景与他们的健康状况也有关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.10%
发文量
263
期刊介绍: Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities reports on the scholarly progress of work to understand, address, and ultimately eliminate health disparities based on race and ethnicity. Efforts to explore underlying causes of health disparities and to describe interventions that have been undertaken to address racial and ethnic health disparities are featured. Promising studies that are ongoing or studies that have longer term data are welcome, as are studies that serve as lessons for best practices in eliminating health disparities. Original research, systematic reviews, and commentaries presenting the state-of-the-art thinking on problems centered on health disparities will be considered for publication. We particularly encourage review articles that generate innovative and testable ideas, and constructive discussions and/or critiques of health disparities.Because the Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities receives a large number of submissions, about 30% of submissions to the Journal are sent out for full peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信