Pathways between grief, depression, hopelessness, reasons for living, and suicidal ideation in bereaved individuals

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
{"title":"Pathways between grief, depression, hopelessness, reasons for living, and suicidal ideation in bereaved individuals","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.08.033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Associations between comorbid depression and grief with suicidal ideation (SI) have been inconsistent. To identify at-risk individuals, it is important to determine the role of symptom severity by examining both continuous and clinical-threshold grief and depression, in addition to other factors (i.e., hopelessness, reasons for living—RFL) associated with SI.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Participants (<em>n</em> = 216) bereaved by combat, accident, or suicide completed an online survey. Associations between depression, grief, SI, RFL, and hopelessness were examined by multivariable logistic regressions and structural equation modeling (SEM).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Across the sample, hopelessness and RFL were associated with SI while continuous measures of grief and depression were not. In contrast, clinical-threshold grief, clinical-threshold depression, hopelessness, and RFL each were associated with SI. In addition, of the grief characteristics, yearning was the most robust correlate of SI, and Survival/Coping Beliefs (SCB) was the RFL most associated with SI. SEM indicated that direct paths between grief and SI, hopelessness and SI, and RFL and SI were significant, but not between depression and SI. Instead, depression had a strong direct effect on hopelessness, and hopelessness had a direct effect on SI.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Results are consistent with previously-identified associations between SI and clinical levels of depression and grief. More nuanced findings suggest hopelessness, yearning, and SCB as additional targets for reducing risk for SI in bereaved individuals regardless of whether they meet clinical thresholds for grief or depression.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16868,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychiatric research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychiatric research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022395624004886","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Associations between comorbid depression and grief with suicidal ideation (SI) have been inconsistent. To identify at-risk individuals, it is important to determine the role of symptom severity by examining both continuous and clinical-threshold grief and depression, in addition to other factors (i.e., hopelessness, reasons for living—RFL) associated with SI.

Methods

Participants (n = 216) bereaved by combat, accident, or suicide completed an online survey. Associations between depression, grief, SI, RFL, and hopelessness were examined by multivariable logistic regressions and structural equation modeling (SEM).

Results

Across the sample, hopelessness and RFL were associated with SI while continuous measures of grief and depression were not. In contrast, clinical-threshold grief, clinical-threshold depression, hopelessness, and RFL each were associated with SI. In addition, of the grief characteristics, yearning was the most robust correlate of SI, and Survival/Coping Beliefs (SCB) was the RFL most associated with SI. SEM indicated that direct paths between grief and SI, hopelessness and SI, and RFL and SI were significant, but not between depression and SI. Instead, depression had a strong direct effect on hopelessness, and hopelessness had a direct effect on SI.

Discussion

Results are consistent with previously-identified associations between SI and clinical levels of depression and grief. More nuanced findings suggest hopelessness, yearning, and SCB as additional targets for reducing risk for SI in bereaved individuals regardless of whether they meet clinical thresholds for grief or depression.
丧亲者的悲伤、抑郁、绝望、生存理由和自杀意念之间的关系。
背景:合并抑郁和悲伤与自杀意念(SI)之间的关系并不一致。为了识别高危人群,除了与自杀意念相关的其他因素(即绝望、生活理由-RFL)外,通过研究持续性和临床阈值悲伤和抑郁来确定症状严重程度的作用也很重要:因战斗、事故或自杀而失去亲人的参与者(n = 216)完成了一项在线调查。通过多变量逻辑回归和结构方程模型(SEM)研究了抑郁、悲伤、SI、RFL 和绝望之间的关联:在所有样本中,绝望感和 RFL 与 SI 相关,而悲伤和抑郁的连续测量值与 SI 无关。相反,临床阈值悲伤、临床阈值抑郁、绝望和 RFL 均与 SI 相关。此外,在悲伤特征中,渴望与 SI 的相关性最强,而生存/应对信念(SCB)是与 SI 相关性最强的 RFL。SEM 表明,悲伤与 SI、绝望与 SI 以及 RFL 与 SI 之间的直接路径是显著的,但抑郁与 SI 之间的直接路径并不显著。相反,抑郁对绝望有很强的直接影响,而绝望对SI有直接影响:讨论:研究结果与之前确定的 SI 与抑郁和悲伤的临床水平之间的关系一致。更细致的研究结果表明,无论丧亲者是否达到悲伤或抑郁的临床阈值,绝望、渴望和 SCB 都是降低其 SI 风险的额外目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of psychiatric research
Journal of psychiatric research 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
622
审稿时长
130 days
期刊介绍: Founded in 1961 to report on the latest work in psychiatry and cognate disciplines, the Journal of Psychiatric Research is dedicated to innovative and timely studies of four important areas of research: (1) clinical studies of all disciplines relating to psychiatric illness, as well as normal human behaviour, including biochemical, physiological, genetic, environmental, social, psychological and epidemiological factors; (2) basic studies pertaining to psychiatry in such fields as neuropsychopharmacology, neuroendocrinology, electrophysiology, genetics, experimental psychology and epidemiology; (3) the growing application of clinical laboratory techniques in psychiatry, including imagery and spectroscopy of the brain, molecular biology and computer sciences;
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信