Rhonda C Bell, Peter Zahradka, Michel Aliani, YuZhu Liang, Megan Jarman, Michelle MacKenzie, Catherine Chan, Jocelyn Ozga, Spencer Proctor, David Wishart, Carla G Taylor
{"title":"A comparison of dry bean and pea consumption on serum cholesterol: A randomized controlled trial in adults with mild hypercholesterolemia.","authors":"Rhonda C Bell, Peter Zahradka, Michel Aliani, YuZhu Liang, Megan Jarman, Michelle MacKenzie, Catherine Chan, Jocelyn Ozga, Spencer Proctor, David Wishart, Carla G Taylor","doi":"10.1016/j.tjnut.2024.09.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diets including pulses are associated with better cardiovascular profiles, including lipid, glycemia and hemodynamics, however, evidence is lacking regarding the contributions of individual pulse varieties.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This randomized, controlled trial examined the effects of beans or peas individually, relative to rice, on LDL-cholesterol levels (primary outcome) and other indices of cardiovascular disease risk (secondary outcomes) at 6 weeks in adults with mild hypercholesterolemia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized, controlled, single-blind, three-arm parallel-group study was conducted in two Canadian cities (Edmonton, Alberta; Winnipeg, Manitoba). Participants (n=60/group) were randomly assigned to 6 weeks of regular consumption of foods containing either 120g (∼¾ cups) of beans (mixture of black, great northern, navy, pinto,) or 120 g (∼¾ cups) peas (mixture of yellow, green) or identical foods containing white, parboiled rice (control foods). LDL-cholesterol (primary outcome) and indices of lipid metabolism, glycemia and hemodynamics (secondary outcomes) were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LDL-cholesterol was lower (mean, (95%CI)) in the bean (-0.21,-0.39 - -0.03) but not the pea (-0.11, -0.29 - 0.07) group, relative to rice after 6 weeks. Non-HDL-cholesterol (-0.20, -0.40 - -0.002) and total cholesterol (-0.28, -0.49- -0.06) were also lower in bean vs. rice groups. No changes were noted in triglycerides (-0.07, -0.28-0.14), glucose (0.02, -0.17-0.14), insulin (4.94, -5.51-11.38), or blood pressure (systolic: -1.39, -5.18-2.40; diastolic: -1.89, -4.65-0.88). Dietary fiber intake (g/day or g/1000 kcal) was not correlated with the LDL-cholesterol (g/d: r<sup>2</sup>=0.209, p=0.142; g/1000 kcal: r<sup>2</sup>=0.126, p=0.379) in the bean group. Gastrointestinal effects were transient and most often not related to the study foods.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Beans, but not peas, lowered LDL-cholesterol, relative to rice, in adults with mild hypercholesterolemia. Fibre may not be responsible for the effect of beans, suggesting other phytochemicals may be the active component(s). Strategies incorporating 120g of pulses in a meal are feasible for managing some cardiometabolic risk factors.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registry: </strong>Clinical Trials.Gov NCT01661543.</p>","PeriodicalId":16620,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjnut.2024.09.011","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Diets including pulses are associated with better cardiovascular profiles, including lipid, glycemia and hemodynamics, however, evidence is lacking regarding the contributions of individual pulse varieties.
Objective: This randomized, controlled trial examined the effects of beans or peas individually, relative to rice, on LDL-cholesterol levels (primary outcome) and other indices of cardiovascular disease risk (secondary outcomes) at 6 weeks in adults with mild hypercholesterolemia.
Methods: This randomized, controlled, single-blind, three-arm parallel-group study was conducted in two Canadian cities (Edmonton, Alberta; Winnipeg, Manitoba). Participants (n=60/group) were randomly assigned to 6 weeks of regular consumption of foods containing either 120g (∼¾ cups) of beans (mixture of black, great northern, navy, pinto,) or 120 g (∼¾ cups) peas (mixture of yellow, green) or identical foods containing white, parboiled rice (control foods). LDL-cholesterol (primary outcome) and indices of lipid metabolism, glycemia and hemodynamics (secondary outcomes) were assessed.
Results: LDL-cholesterol was lower (mean, (95%CI)) in the bean (-0.21,-0.39 - -0.03) but not the pea (-0.11, -0.29 - 0.07) group, relative to rice after 6 weeks. Non-HDL-cholesterol (-0.20, -0.40 - -0.002) and total cholesterol (-0.28, -0.49- -0.06) were also lower in bean vs. rice groups. No changes were noted in triglycerides (-0.07, -0.28-0.14), glucose (0.02, -0.17-0.14), insulin (4.94, -5.51-11.38), or blood pressure (systolic: -1.39, -5.18-2.40; diastolic: -1.89, -4.65-0.88). Dietary fiber intake (g/day or g/1000 kcal) was not correlated with the LDL-cholesterol (g/d: r2=0.209, p=0.142; g/1000 kcal: r2=0.126, p=0.379) in the bean group. Gastrointestinal effects were transient and most often not related to the study foods.
Conclusions: Beans, but not peas, lowered LDL-cholesterol, relative to rice, in adults with mild hypercholesterolemia. Fibre may not be responsible for the effect of beans, suggesting other phytochemicals may be the active component(s). Strategies incorporating 120g of pulses in a meal are feasible for managing some cardiometabolic risk factors.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Nutrition (JN/J Nutr) publishes peer-reviewed original research papers covering all aspects of experimental nutrition in humans and other animal species; special articles such as reviews and biographies of prominent nutrition scientists; and issues, opinions, and commentaries on controversial issues in nutrition. Supplements are frequently published to provide extended discussion of topics of special interest.