The correlation between intracranial pressure and venous sinus pressures changes after venous sinus stenting.

IF 4.5 1区 医学 Q1 NEUROIMAGING
Ankitha M Iyer, Jackson P Midtlien, Carol Kittel, Lucas A Klever, Angelina Wiater, Emily Chang, Connor Margraf, Kyle M Fargen
{"title":"The correlation between intracranial pressure and venous sinus pressures changes after venous sinus stenting.","authors":"Ankitha M Iyer, Jackson P Midtlien, Carol Kittel, Lucas A Klever, Angelina Wiater, Emily Chang, Connor Margraf, Kyle M Fargen","doi":"10.1136/jnis-2024-022250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The pathophysiology of idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) and other cerebral venous outflow disorders (CVD) has largely been unexplored. While a correlation between venous sinus pressure and opening pressure (OP) has been previously noted, there are limited data on this relationship in patients with prior venous sinus stenting (VSS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single center retrospective chart review was conducted on CVD patients who underwent diagnostic cerebral venography with manometry followed immediately by lateral decubitus lumbar puncture, from 2016 to 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>206 patients underwent 216 total procedures and were included. Among all patients, there was a moderate nearly one-to-one correlation between OP and torcular or superior sagittal sinus (SSS) pressures. Thirty-two patients underwent testing after having undergone VSS. Patients with previous VSS showed a significantly altered relationship between venous pressures and OP, whereby as venous sinus pressures increased, OP increased more gradually in previously stented patients compared with non-stented patients. For example, when OP was fixed at 21 mm Hg and body mass index at 30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, predicted mean SSS pressure was 19.47 mm Hg in non-stented patients versus 16.91 mm Hg in stented patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study confirmed a strong relationship between OP and venous sinus pressure in CVD patients. However, patients with previous VSS demonstrated an altered relationship with higher CSF pressures relative to venous pressures compared with naïve patients. This finding may have important clinical implications in the management of IIH patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":16411,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2024-022250","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The pathophysiology of idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) and other cerebral venous outflow disorders (CVD) has largely been unexplored. While a correlation between venous sinus pressure and opening pressure (OP) has been previously noted, there are limited data on this relationship in patients with prior venous sinus stenting (VSS).

Methods: A single center retrospective chart review was conducted on CVD patients who underwent diagnostic cerebral venography with manometry followed immediately by lateral decubitus lumbar puncture, from 2016 to 2024.

Results: 206 patients underwent 216 total procedures and were included. Among all patients, there was a moderate nearly one-to-one correlation between OP and torcular or superior sagittal sinus (SSS) pressures. Thirty-two patients underwent testing after having undergone VSS. Patients with previous VSS showed a significantly altered relationship between venous pressures and OP, whereby as venous sinus pressures increased, OP increased more gradually in previously stented patients compared with non-stented patients. For example, when OP was fixed at 21 mm Hg and body mass index at 30 kg/m2, predicted mean SSS pressure was 19.47 mm Hg in non-stented patients versus 16.91 mm Hg in stented patients.

Conclusion: This study confirmed a strong relationship between OP and venous sinus pressure in CVD patients. However, patients with previous VSS demonstrated an altered relationship with higher CSF pressures relative to venous pressures compared with naïve patients. This finding may have important clinical implications in the management of IIH patients.

静脉窦支架术后颅内压与静脉窦压力之间的相关性变化。
背景:特发性颅内高压(IIH)和其他脑静脉流出障碍(CVD)的病理生理学在很大程度上尚未得到研究。虽然静脉窦压力与开放压(OP)之间的相关性以前就已被注意到,但对于曾接受静脉窦支架植入术(VSS)的患者,有关这种关系的数据却很有限:方法:对2016年至2024年期间接受诊断性脑静脉造影和测压后立即进行侧卧位腰椎穿刺的心血管疾病患者进行了单中心回顾性病历审查。在所有患者中,OP 和蝶窦或上矢状窦(SSS)压力之间存在近乎一一对应的中度相关性。32 名患者在接受 VSS 后接受了测试。曾接受过 VSS 的患者的静脉压力与 OP 之间的关系发生了明显变化,即随着静脉窦压力的增加,曾接受过支架植入术的患者与未接受支架植入术的患者相比,OP 的增加更为缓慢。例如,当 OP 值固定为 21 毫米汞柱、体重指数为 30 千克/平方米时,非支架患者的预测平均 SSS 压力为 19.47 毫米汞柱,而支架患者为 16.91 毫米汞柱:本研究证实,心血管疾病患者的 OP 与静脉窦压力之间存在密切关系。然而,与新患者相比,曾有过 VSS 的患者与静脉压力之间的关系发生了改变,相对于静脉压力,脑脊液压力更高。这一发现可能对 IIH 患者的治疗具有重要的临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
14.60%
发文量
291
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery (JNIS) is a leading peer review journal for scientific research and literature pertaining to the field of neurointerventional surgery. The journal launch follows growing professional interest in neurointerventional techniques for the treatment of a range of neurological and vascular problems including stroke, aneurysms, brain tumors, and spinal compression.The journal is owned by SNIS and is also the official journal of the Interventional Chapter of the Australian and New Zealand Society of Neuroradiology (ANZSNR), the Canadian Interventional Neuro Group, the Hong Kong Neurological Society (HKNS) and the Neuroradiological Society of Taiwan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信