Differential Prognostic Impact of Clinical Congestion between Preserved versus Reduced Ejection Fraction in Patients Hospitalized for Acute Decompensated Heart Failure: Findings from the Japanese Kyoto Congestive Heart Failure Registry

IF 8.2 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
KAZUYA NAGAO MD , TAKAO KATO MD , HIDENORI YAKU MD , TAKESHI MORIMOTO MD, MPH , KENJI AIDA MD , SHIORI KAWAKAMI MARUICHI MD , YASUTAKA INUZUKA MD , YODO TAMAKI MD , ERIKA YAMAMOTO MD , YUSUKE YOSHIKAWA MD , TAKESHI KITAI MD , RYOJI TANIGUCHI MD , MORITAKE IGUCHI MD , MASASHI KATO MD , MAMORU TAKAHASHI MD , TOSHIKAZU JINNAI MD , TAKAFUMI KAWAI MD , AKIHIRO KOMASA MD , RYUSUKE NISHIKAWA MD , YUICHI KAWASE MD , TAKESHI KIMURA MD
{"title":"Differential Prognostic Impact of Clinical Congestion between Preserved versus Reduced Ejection Fraction in Patients Hospitalized for Acute Decompensated Heart Failure: Findings from the Japanese Kyoto Congestive Heart Failure Registry","authors":"KAZUYA NAGAO MD ,&nbsp;TAKAO KATO MD ,&nbsp;HIDENORI YAKU MD ,&nbsp;TAKESHI MORIMOTO MD, MPH ,&nbsp;KENJI AIDA MD ,&nbsp;SHIORI KAWAKAMI MARUICHI MD ,&nbsp;YASUTAKA INUZUKA MD ,&nbsp;YODO TAMAKI MD ,&nbsp;ERIKA YAMAMOTO MD ,&nbsp;YUSUKE YOSHIKAWA MD ,&nbsp;TAKESHI KITAI MD ,&nbsp;RYOJI TANIGUCHI MD ,&nbsp;MORITAKE IGUCHI MD ,&nbsp;MASASHI KATO MD ,&nbsp;MAMORU TAKAHASHI MD ,&nbsp;TOSHIKAZU JINNAI MD ,&nbsp;TAKAFUMI KAWAI MD ,&nbsp;AKIHIRO KOMASA MD ,&nbsp;RYUSUKE NISHIKAWA MD ,&nbsp;YUICHI KAWASE MD ,&nbsp;TAKESHI KIMURA MD","doi":"10.1016/j.cardfail.2024.08.060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Most patients hospitalized for heart failure (HF) present with signs of congestion. Prognostic significance of clinical congestion may vary depending on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). This study aims to investigate the prognostic impact of congestion across different LVEF categories.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and Results</h3><div>Composite congestion scores (CCSs; 0–9) derived from the severity of edema, jugular venous pressure, and orthopnea, were analyzed on admission and at discharge in 3787 patients hospitalized for HF (LVEF ≥ 40%: n = 2347, LVEF &lt; 40%: n = 1440). The median admission CCS was 4 in both LVEF strata (<em>P</em> = .64). Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs; 95% confidence interval [CI]) of the moderate (CCS 4–6) and severe congestion [7–9] groups relative to the mild congestion [0–3] group on admission for a composite of all-cause death or HF rehospitalization were 1.20 (1.04–1.39, <em>P</em> = .01) and 1.54 (1.27–1.86, <em>P</em> &lt; .001) in the LVEF ≥ 40% stratum, and 1.20 (1.01–1.44, <em>P</em> = .04) and 0.82 (0.61–1.07, <em>P</em> = .14) in the LVEF &lt; 40% stratum, respectively (<em>P</em><sub>interaction</sub>&lt; .001). A total of 16% of the patients with LVEF ≥40% and 14% with LVEF &lt;40% had residual congestion (CCS ≥ 1) at discharge, which was associated with a respective adjusted HR of 1.40 (1.18–1.65, <em>P</em> &lt; .001) and 1.25 (0.98–1.58, <em>P</em> = .07) for postdischarge death or HF rehospitalization (<em>P</em><sub>interaction</sub> = 0.63).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The severity of clinical congestion on admission was associated with adverse clinical outcomes in patients with LVEF ≥ 40%, but not in those with LVEF &lt; 40%. These findings warrant further studies to better understand the detailed profile of congestion across the LVEF spectrum.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15204,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiac Failure","volume":"31 6","pages":"Pages 912-924"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiac Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1071916424004135","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Most patients hospitalized for heart failure (HF) present with signs of congestion. Prognostic significance of clinical congestion may vary depending on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). This study aims to investigate the prognostic impact of congestion across different LVEF categories.

Methods and Results

Composite congestion scores (CCSs; 0–9) derived from the severity of edema, jugular venous pressure, and orthopnea, were analyzed on admission and at discharge in 3787 patients hospitalized for HF (LVEF ≥ 40%: n = 2347, LVEF < 40%: n = 1440). The median admission CCS was 4 in both LVEF strata (P = .64). Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs; 95% confidence interval [CI]) of the moderate (CCS 4–6) and severe congestion [7–9] groups relative to the mild congestion [0–3] group on admission for a composite of all-cause death or HF rehospitalization were 1.20 (1.04–1.39, P = .01) and 1.54 (1.27–1.86, P < .001) in the LVEF ≥ 40% stratum, and 1.20 (1.01–1.44, P = .04) and 0.82 (0.61–1.07, P = .14) in the LVEF < 40% stratum, respectively (Pinteraction< .001). A total of 16% of the patients with LVEF ≥40% and 14% with LVEF <40% had residual congestion (CCS ≥ 1) at discharge, which was associated with a respective adjusted HR of 1.40 (1.18–1.65, P < .001) and 1.25 (0.98–1.58, P = .07) for postdischarge death or HF rehospitalization (Pinteraction = 0.63).

Conclusion

The severity of clinical congestion on admission was associated with adverse clinical outcomes in patients with LVEF ≥ 40%, but not in those with LVEF < 40%. These findings warrant further studies to better understand the detailed profile of congestion across the LVEF spectrum.
在因急性失代偿性心力衰竭住院的患者中,射血分数保留与减少对临床充血的预后影响存在差异:来自日本 KCHF 登记处的研究结果。
背景:大多数因心力衰竭(HF)住院的患者都会出现充血症状。临床充血的预后意义可能因左心室射血分数(LVEF)而异。本研究旨在探讨充血对不同 LVEF 类别预后的影响:对 3787 名因高血压住院的患者(LVEF≥40%:n=2347,LVEF 交互作用=0.63)在入院时和出院时的水肿严重程度、颈静脉压和呼吸暂停得出的综合充血评分(CCS)(0-9)进行了分析:结论:LVEF≥40%的患者入院时临床充血的严重程度与不良临床结果有关,但LVEF≥40%的患者入院时临床充血的严重程度与不良临床结果无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiac Failure
Journal of Cardiac Failure 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
653
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiac Failure publishes original, peer-reviewed communications of scientific excellence and review articles on clinical research, basic human studies, animal studies, and bench research with potential clinical applications to heart failure - pathogenesis, etiology, epidemiology, pathophysiological mechanisms, assessment, prevention, and treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信