Association of polypharmacy with clinical outcomes and healthcare utilization in older adults with cardiometabolic diseases: a retrospective cohort study.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Su Su, Xuelu Zhu, Shiqi Wu, Wenyao Ma, Suying Yan, Lan Zhang
{"title":"Association of polypharmacy with clinical outcomes and healthcare utilization in older adults with cardiometabolic diseases: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Su Su, Xuelu Zhu, Shiqi Wu, Wenyao Ma, Suying Yan, Lan Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s11096-024-01809-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Limited knowledge exists on the association between polypharmacy among older patients diagnosed with cardiometabolic diseases and the risk of clinical outcomes and healthcare utilization.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to estimate the impact of polypharmacy on clinical outcomes and healthcare utilization in older adults with cardiometabolic diseases.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A retrospective cohort analysis was performed using data from the Beijing Municipal Medical Insurance Database. The study focused on polypharmacy prescribing patterns in community-dwelling adults 65 years and older with cardiometabolic diseases. Polypharmacy was defined as the use of five or more medications on the index date. The primary outcome included clinical outcomes, including hospitalizations and emergency department visits. The secondary outcome focuses on hospital utilization, specifically medication costs and length of stay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included a cohort of 405,608 patients. Among these, the most frequently used drug classes in the polypharmacy and non-polypharmacy groups were HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors and dihydropyridines, respectively. After adjustment for covariates, polypharmacy was not associated with an increased risk of hospitalization (odds ratio [OR] 1.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.95-1.26, p = 0.23) or ED visits (OR 1.28, 95% CI 0.97-1.68, p = 0.08). Similarly, no significant association was found with an increase in inpatient medication costs ($2,620.5, 95% CI $2387.3-$2894.3, p = 0.97) or length of stay (3.98 days, 95% CI 3.68-4.30 days, p = 0.79). However, polypharmacy was associated with higher medication costs in outpatient settings ($73.07, 95% CI $72-$74, p < 0.05) and ED visits ($51.2, 95% CI $44.5-$59.1, p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although polypharmacy is associated with increased healthcare costs in outpatient settings and ED visits, it does not significantly increase the risk of hospitalization or ED visits when properly managed.</p>","PeriodicalId":13828,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-024-01809-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Limited knowledge exists on the association between polypharmacy among older patients diagnosed with cardiometabolic diseases and the risk of clinical outcomes and healthcare utilization.

Aim: This study aimed to estimate the impact of polypharmacy on clinical outcomes and healthcare utilization in older adults with cardiometabolic diseases.

Method: A retrospective cohort analysis was performed using data from the Beijing Municipal Medical Insurance Database. The study focused on polypharmacy prescribing patterns in community-dwelling adults 65 years and older with cardiometabolic diseases. Polypharmacy was defined as the use of five or more medications on the index date. The primary outcome included clinical outcomes, including hospitalizations and emergency department visits. The secondary outcome focuses on hospital utilization, specifically medication costs and length of stay.

Results: The study included a cohort of 405,608 patients. Among these, the most frequently used drug classes in the polypharmacy and non-polypharmacy groups were HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors and dihydropyridines, respectively. After adjustment for covariates, polypharmacy was not associated with an increased risk of hospitalization (odds ratio [OR] 1.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.95-1.26, p = 0.23) or ED visits (OR 1.28, 95% CI 0.97-1.68, p = 0.08). Similarly, no significant association was found with an increase in inpatient medication costs ($2,620.5, 95% CI $2387.3-$2894.3, p = 0.97) or length of stay (3.98 days, 95% CI 3.68-4.30 days, p = 0.79). However, polypharmacy was associated with higher medication costs in outpatient settings ($73.07, 95% CI $72-$74, p < 0.05) and ED visits ($51.2, 95% CI $44.5-$59.1, p < 0.05).

Conclusion: Although polypharmacy is associated with increased healthcare costs in outpatient settings and ED visits, it does not significantly increase the risk of hospitalization or ED visits when properly managed.

多药治疗与患有心脏代谢疾病的老年人的临床结果和医疗保健利用率之间的关系:一项回顾性队列研究。
背景:目前对确诊患有心脏代谢疾病的老年患者使用多种药物与临床结果和医疗使用风险之间关系的了解有限:目的:本研究旨在估算多药治疗对患有心脏代谢疾病的老年人的临床预后和医疗利用率的影响:方法:利用北京市医疗保险数据库的数据进行回顾性队列分析。研究的重点是 65 岁及以上社区居民中患有心脏代谢疾病的老年人的多药处方模式。多药处方的定义是在指数日使用五种或五种以上药物。主要结果包括住院和急诊就诊等临床结果。次要结果侧重于医院利用率,特别是用药成本和住院时间:研究包括 405 608 名患者。其中,多药组和非多药组中最常用的药物类别分别是 HMG-CoA 还原酶抑制剂和二氢吡啶类药物。在对协变量进行调整后,多药治疗与住院风险(几率比 [OR] 1.09,95% 置信区间 [CI]0.95-1.26,P = 0.23)或急诊就诊风险(OR 1.28,95% CI 0.97-1.68,P = 0.08)的增加无关。同样,住院药费(2620.5 美元,95% CI 2387.3- 2894.3 美元,p = 0.97)或住院时间(3.98 天,95% CI 3.68-4.30 天,p = 0.79)的增加也与多药治疗无明显关系。然而,在门诊环境中,多重用药与较高的用药成本相关(73.07 美元,95% CI 72-74 美元,p 结论:多重用药与较高的用药成本相关:虽然多重用药与门诊和急诊室就诊的医疗费用增加有关,但如果管理得当,并不会显著增加住院或急诊室就诊的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
131
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy (IJCP) offers a platform for articles on research in Clinical Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Care and related practice-oriented subjects in the pharmaceutical sciences. IJCP is a bi-monthly, international, peer-reviewed journal that publishes original research data, new ideas and discussions on pharmacotherapy and outcome research, clinical pharmacy, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacoeconomics, the clinical use of medicines, medical devices and laboratory tests, information on medicines and medical devices information, pharmacy services research, medication management, other clinical aspects of pharmacy. IJCP publishes original Research articles, Review articles , Short research reports, Commentaries, book reviews, and Letters to the Editor. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy is affiliated with the European Society of Clinical Pharmacy (ESCP). ESCP promotes practice and research in Clinical Pharmacy, especially in Europe. The general aim of the society is to advance education, practice and research in Clinical Pharmacy . Until 2010 the journal was called Pharmacy World & Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信