A discrete choice experiment to understand preferences of patients with type 2 diabetes about the attributes of GLP1 receptor agonists in Spain.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-08 DOI:10.1080/03007995.2024.2407960
Patricia San José, Ana Monteagudo, Antonio Picó, Miren Sequera, Jesús Medina
{"title":"A discrete choice experiment to understand preferences of patients with type 2 diabetes about the attributes of GLP1 receptor agonists in Spain.","authors":"Patricia San José, Ana Monteagudo, Antonio Picó, Miren Sequera, Jesús Medina","doi":"10.1080/03007995.2024.2407960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the preferences regarding injection, medication frequency and complexity of GLP1 receptor agonists among patients with type 2 diabetes, treatment-naïve for such drugs in Spain. Additionally, patients' willingness to pay according to these attributes was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A discrete-choice experiment survey designed to evaluate patients' preferences over three attributes discriminating by age, sex and patients experience with previous injectable treatment was fulfilled by patients. The resulting model was analyzed using a conditional (fixed-effects) logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 180 patients (63.35 ± 11.49 years, 63.28% men, 48.41% with previous cardiovascular disease, 54.69% with a time of evolution of diabetes >10 years) recruited from 5 health care centers in Spain completed the survey. Patients viewed positively weekly injections (vs daily injections), but rated negatively a complex preparation of the dose (vs simple preparation). Whereas naïve patients for injectable medications did not consider administration timing of importance, no naïve patients considered it relevant. No relevant differences were observed according to age or gender. Patients were willing to pay 83.25€for a \"no preparation required\" dose. No naïve and naïve patients were willing to pay 34.61€ and 14.35€; <i>p</i> = 0.000, to change daily injection for a weekly injection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients highly valued the avoidance of injections, with weekly dosing clearly preferred over daily dosing, as well as reducing the treatment complexity. These findings may provide a better understanding of what patients prefer and value in their treatment and provide guidance for clinicians making therapeutic decisions regarding treatments of patients with type 2 diabetes.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2024.2407960","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine the preferences regarding injection, medication frequency and complexity of GLP1 receptor agonists among patients with type 2 diabetes, treatment-naïve for such drugs in Spain. Additionally, patients' willingness to pay according to these attributes was evaluated.

Methods: A discrete-choice experiment survey designed to evaluate patients' preferences over three attributes discriminating by age, sex and patients experience with previous injectable treatment was fulfilled by patients. The resulting model was analyzed using a conditional (fixed-effects) logistic regression.

Results: A total of 180 patients (63.35 ± 11.49 years, 63.28% men, 48.41% with previous cardiovascular disease, 54.69% with a time of evolution of diabetes >10 years) recruited from 5 health care centers in Spain completed the survey. Patients viewed positively weekly injections (vs daily injections), but rated negatively a complex preparation of the dose (vs simple preparation). Whereas naïve patients for injectable medications did not consider administration timing of importance, no naïve patients considered it relevant. No relevant differences were observed according to age or gender. Patients were willing to pay 83.25€for a "no preparation required" dose. No naïve and naïve patients were willing to pay 34.61€ and 14.35€; p = 0.000, to change daily injection for a weekly injection.

Conclusions: Patients highly valued the avoidance of injections, with weekly dosing clearly preferred over daily dosing, as well as reducing the treatment complexity. These findings may provide a better understanding of what patients prefer and value in their treatment and provide guidance for clinicians making therapeutic decisions regarding treatments of patients with type 2 diabetes.

通过离散选择实验了解西班牙 2 型糖尿病患者对 GLP1 受体激动剂属性的偏好。
目的确定西班牙未接受过此类药物治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者对 GLP1 受体激动剂的注射、用药频率和复杂性的偏好。此外,还评估了患者根据这些属性付费的意愿:方法:对患者进行离散选择实验调查,旨在评估患者对年龄、性别和既往注射治疗经验这三个属性的偏好。采用条件(固定效应)逻辑回归分析得出的模型:从西班牙 5 家医疗中心招募的 180 名患者(63.35 ± 11.49 岁,63.28% 为男性,48.41% 曾患心血管疾病,54.69% 患糖尿病时间超过 10 年)完成了调查。患者对每周注射(与每日注射相比)持肯定态度,但对剂量的复杂配制(与简单配制相比)持否定态度。对于注射药物,新手患者认为给药时间不重要,而没有新手患者认为给药时间重要。没有观察到年龄或性别方面的相关差异。患者愿意为 "无需配制 "的剂量支付 83.25 欧元。没有天真和幼稚患者愿意分别支付 34.61 欧元和 14.35 欧元(P = 0.000)将每日注射改为每周注射:结论:患者非常重视避免注射的效果,每周用药显然比每天用药更受欢迎,同时也降低了治疗的复杂性。这些发现有助于更好地了解患者对治疗的偏好和重视程度,并为临床医生就 2 型糖尿病患者的治疗决策提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信