Sympathetic ophthalmia: epidemiology and cohort-based assessment of clinical outcomes.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Tim J Patterson, Weidong Gu, David Eliason, William Rojas-Carabali, Bernett Lee, Padmamalini Mahendradas, Jyotrimay Biswas, Parthopratim Dutta Majumder, Manisha Agarwal, Carlos Pavesio, Vishali Gupta, Rupesh Agrawal, Richard James Blanch
{"title":"Sympathetic ophthalmia: epidemiology and cohort-based assessment of clinical outcomes.","authors":"Tim J Patterson, Weidong Gu, David Eliason, William Rojas-Carabali, Bernett Lee, Padmamalini Mahendradas, Jyotrimay Biswas, Parthopratim Dutta Majumder, Manisha Agarwal, Carlos Pavesio, Vishali Gupta, Rupesh Agrawal, Richard James Blanch","doi":"10.1136/bjo-2024-325267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this study was to report the incidence, time after inciting event, aetiology and risk after specific intraocular procedures and the visual outcomes associated with sympathetic ophthalmia (SO) occurrence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study reports data from multiple retrospective cohorts: retrospective population-based data were extracted from the TRICARE service network (between 2017 and 2021) and retrospective case-based data from the Ocular Autoimmune Systemic Inflammatory Infectious Study (OASIS) database (cohorts from the UK, South India and North India).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 159 patients with SO identified. The length of time from sensitising event to SO occurrence was a median of 151 days (range: 6-9100 days).In the TRICARE database, 2 patients developed SO after open globe trauma and primary repair (of 615 eyes, rate 0.33%; 95% CI 1.26% to 1.30%). None developed SO after vitrectomy (total of 23 903 events; 95% CI 0% to 0.012%). The combined North Indian and UK cohorts reported 78.6% (81 patients) after trauma, 18.45% (19 patients) after elective surgery.Visual outcomes were reported in the OASIS database for 98.01% of patients (155 of 157 patients). The median presenting and final best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) for the inciting eye were no perception of light, the median presenting and final BCVA for the sympathising eye were 0.65 and 0.3 logMAR, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study identified 159 cases of SO. With poor visual outcomes in the inciting eye, early diagnosis and management are crucial for optimising visual outcomes in the sympathising eye.</p>","PeriodicalId":9313,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo-2024-325267","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to report the incidence, time after inciting event, aetiology and risk after specific intraocular procedures and the visual outcomes associated with sympathetic ophthalmia (SO) occurrence.

Methods: This study reports data from multiple retrospective cohorts: retrospective population-based data were extracted from the TRICARE service network (between 2017 and 2021) and retrospective case-based data from the Ocular Autoimmune Systemic Inflammatory Infectious Study (OASIS) database (cohorts from the UK, South India and North India).

Results: There were 159 patients with SO identified. The length of time from sensitising event to SO occurrence was a median of 151 days (range: 6-9100 days).In the TRICARE database, 2 patients developed SO after open globe trauma and primary repair (of 615 eyes, rate 0.33%; 95% CI 1.26% to 1.30%). None developed SO after vitrectomy (total of 23 903 events; 95% CI 0% to 0.012%). The combined North Indian and UK cohorts reported 78.6% (81 patients) after trauma, 18.45% (19 patients) after elective surgery.Visual outcomes were reported in the OASIS database for 98.01% of patients (155 of 157 patients). The median presenting and final best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) for the inciting eye were no perception of light, the median presenting and final BCVA for the sympathising eye were 0.65 and 0.3 logMAR, respectively.

Conclusion: This study identified 159 cases of SO. With poor visual outcomes in the inciting eye, early diagnosis and management are crucial for optimising visual outcomes in the sympathising eye.

交感神经性眼炎:流行病学和基于队列的临床结果评估。
背景:本研究旨在报告特定眼内手术后的发病率、诱发事件后的时间、病因和风险,以及与交感神经性眼炎(SO)发生相关的视觉结果:本研究报告了多个回顾性队列的数据:从TRICARE服务网络(2017年至2021年)中提取了基于人群的回顾性数据,从眼部自身免疫系统炎症感染研究(OASIS)数据库(英国、南印度和北印度队列)中提取了基于病例的回顾性数据:结果:共发现 159 名 SO 患者。在 TRICARE 数据库中,有 2 名患者在开球创伤和初级修复后出现 SO(615 只眼睛中,发病率为 0.33%;95% CI 为 1.26% 至 1.30%)。玻璃体切除术后无一例发生 SO(共 23 903 例;95% CI 0% 至 0.012%)。据北印度和英国的联合队列报告,78.6%的患者(81例)在外伤后发生SO,18.45%的患者(19例)在择期手术后发生SO。OASIS数据库报告了98.01%的患者(157例患者中的155例)的视觉结果。诱发眼的初次和最终最佳矫正视力(BCVA)中位数均为无光感,同情眼的初次和最终BCVA中位数分别为0.65和0.3 logMAR:本研究发现了 159 例 SO。由于诱发眼的视觉效果不佳,早期诊断和治疗对于优化交感眼的视觉效果至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
2.40%
发文量
213
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Ophthalmology (BJO) is an international peer-reviewed journal for ophthalmologists and visual science specialists. BJO publishes clinical investigations, clinical observations, and clinically relevant laboratory investigations related to ophthalmology. It also provides major reviews and also publishes manuscripts covering regional issues in a global context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信