Evolving Role of Coronary Collaterals in STEMI Outcomes: A Comparative Analysis of Pandemic and Post-Pandemic Phases.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Ozgur Ulas Ozcan, Muhammed Bora Demircelik, Aykun Hakgor, Atakan Dursun, Arzu Yazar, Aysel Akhundova, Beytullah Cakal, Oguz Karaca, Bilal Boztosun
{"title":"Evolving Role of Coronary Collaterals in STEMI Outcomes: A Comparative Analysis of Pandemic and Post-Pandemic Phases.","authors":"Ozgur Ulas Ozcan, Muhammed Bora Demircelik, Aykun Hakgor, Atakan Dursun, Arzu Yazar, Aysel Akhundova, Beytullah Cakal, Oguz Karaca, Bilal Boztosun","doi":"10.1177/00033197241288662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is a critical condition where coronary collaterals can mitigate myocardial damage. The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic introduced unique challenges in STEMI management, potentially affecting outcomes. This study evaluates the efficacy of coronary collaterals during the pandemic compared to the post-pandemic period. A review of 1465 STEMI patients treated at a high-volume tertiary care center from April 2020 to December 2022 was conducted. Collaterals were assessed using the Rentrop classification. In-hospital mortality and 1-year major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were analyzed based on collateral status and timeframes. During the pandemic, there was a higher incidence of robust collaterals (28.2% vs 23.2%, <i>P</i> = .04), but they were less protective, with similar in-hospital mortality (14.4% vs 8.1%, <i>P</i> = .07) and 1-year MACE rates (21.9% vs 30.4%, <i>P</i> = .09) across groups. Post-pandemic, robust collaterals showed significant protective effects with reduced in-hospital mortality (3.6% vs 7.4%, <i>P</i> = .04) and 1-year MACE rates (17.1% vs 24.9%, <i>P</i> = .03). These findings highlight a dynamic role of collaterals in STEMI management, with the pandemic impairing their functionality. This underscores the need for adaptive STEMI care strategies, especially during global health crises.</p>","PeriodicalId":8264,"journal":{"name":"Angiology","volume":" ","pages":"33197241288662"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Angiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00033197241288662","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is a critical condition where coronary collaterals can mitigate myocardial damage. The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic introduced unique challenges in STEMI management, potentially affecting outcomes. This study evaluates the efficacy of coronary collaterals during the pandemic compared to the post-pandemic period. A review of 1465 STEMI patients treated at a high-volume tertiary care center from April 2020 to December 2022 was conducted. Collaterals were assessed using the Rentrop classification. In-hospital mortality and 1-year major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were analyzed based on collateral status and timeframes. During the pandemic, there was a higher incidence of robust collaterals (28.2% vs 23.2%, P = .04), but they were less protective, with similar in-hospital mortality (14.4% vs 8.1%, P = .07) and 1-year MACE rates (21.9% vs 30.4%, P = .09) across groups. Post-pandemic, robust collaterals showed significant protective effects with reduced in-hospital mortality (3.6% vs 7.4%, P = .04) and 1-year MACE rates (17.1% vs 24.9%, P = .03). These findings highlight a dynamic role of collaterals in STEMI management, with the pandemic impairing their functionality. This underscores the need for adaptive STEMI care strategies, especially during global health crises.

冠状动脉袢在 STEMI 结果中不断演变的作用:大流行阶段和大流行后阶段的比较分析。
急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)是一种危重病症,冠状动脉袢可减轻心肌损伤。2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行给 STEMI 的治疗带来了独特的挑战,可能会影响治疗效果。本研究评估了大流行期间与大流行后冠状动脉搭桥的疗效。研究回顾了 2020 年 4 月至 2022 年 12 月期间在一家大容量三级医疗中心接受治疗的 1465 名 STEMI 患者。采用伦特洛普分类法对袢血进行评估。根据侧支状态和时间框架分析了院内死亡率和 1 年主要心脏不良事件 (MACE)。大流行期间,稳健侧支的发生率较高(28.2% vs 23.2%,P = .04),但其保护作用较弱,各组的院内死亡率(14.4% vs 8.1%,P = .07)和 1 年 MACE 发生率(21.9% vs 30.4%,P = .09)相似。大流行后,稳健的副脉显示出显著的保护作用,降低了院内死亡率(3.6% vs 7.4%,P = .04)和 1 年 MACE 发生率(17.1% vs 24.9%,P = .03)。这些研究结果突显了瓣膜在 STEMI 治疗中的动态作用,大流行损害了瓣膜的功能。这强调了对 STEMI 治疗策略进行调整的必要性,尤其是在全球健康危机期间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Angiology
Angiology 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
180
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: A presentation of original, peer-reviewed original articles, review and case reports relative to all phases of all vascular diseases, Angiology (ANG) offers more than a typical cardiology journal. With approximately 1000 pages per year covering diagnostic methods, therapeutic approaches, and clinical and laboratory research, ANG is among the most informative publications in the field of peripheral vascular and cardiovascular diseases. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Average time from submission to first decision: 13 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信