Blood-dominant disease in late-and-early-onset lupus: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 9.2 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY
Sarah Abi Doumeth , Jeries Kort , Omer Nuri Pamuk
{"title":"Blood-dominant disease in late-and-early-onset lupus: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Sarah Abi Doumeth ,&nbsp;Jeries Kort ,&nbsp;Omer Nuri Pamuk","doi":"10.1016/j.autrev.2024.103652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Numerous studies have explored hematological manifestations in early-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (erSLE) (age ≤ 50) and late-onset SLE (ltSLE) patients (age &gt; 50), yielding diverse results. This study employs a meta-analysis to examine differences in hematologic manifestations between ltSLE and erSLE.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Studies investigating the frequency of hematological manifestations in ltSLE patients were included. The frequencies of autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA), thrombocytopenia (TP), lymphopenia, leukopenia, lymphadenopathy, and thrombosis were compared between erSLE and ltSLE groups. Two authors independently reviewed and assessed data consistency among abstracts, tables, and text to mitigate bias. Forest plots were utilized to compare odds ratios (95 % CI) of hematological manifestations by age groups, and study heterogeneity was evaluated using I<sup>2</sup>.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The analysis included 39 eligible studies with 19,103 SLE patients (16,314 erSLE, 2789 ltSLE). Among these studies, 28 reported AIHA which was found to be more frequent in erSLE (OR = 1.29, 95 %CI = 1.11–1.39, <em>p</em> = 0.0008). Twenty studies provided data on lymphopenia which was found to be more frequent in erSLE (OR = 1.184, 95 %CI = 1.063–1.318, <em>p</em> = 0.0021). 32 studies included data on leukopenia and the frequency was higher in erSLE (OR: 1.338, 95 %CI: 1.22–1.47, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.0001). Lymphadenopathy was more prevalent in erSLE (OR = 2.32, 95 % CI = 1.61–3.34, p &lt; 0.0001). No significant difference was observed in thrombosis and TP frequency between the two groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Attributing hematological findings to SLE in late-onset patients presents challenges due to comorbidities and polypharmacy. Overall, the frequencies of AIHA, lymphopenia, leukopenia, and lymphadenopathy were more common in erSLE patients compared to ltSLE in this study.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8664,"journal":{"name":"Autoimmunity reviews","volume":"23 11","pages":"Article 103652"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Autoimmunity reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1568997224001435","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Numerous studies have explored hematological manifestations in early-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (erSLE) (age ≤ 50) and late-onset SLE (ltSLE) patients (age > 50), yielding diverse results. This study employs a meta-analysis to examine differences in hematologic manifestations between ltSLE and erSLE.

Methods

Studies investigating the frequency of hematological manifestations in ltSLE patients were included. The frequencies of autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA), thrombocytopenia (TP), lymphopenia, leukopenia, lymphadenopathy, and thrombosis were compared between erSLE and ltSLE groups. Two authors independently reviewed and assessed data consistency among abstracts, tables, and text to mitigate bias. Forest plots were utilized to compare odds ratios (95 % CI) of hematological manifestations by age groups, and study heterogeneity was evaluated using I2.

Results

The analysis included 39 eligible studies with 19,103 SLE patients (16,314 erSLE, 2789 ltSLE). Among these studies, 28 reported AIHA which was found to be more frequent in erSLE (OR = 1.29, 95 %CI = 1.11–1.39, p = 0.0008). Twenty studies provided data on lymphopenia which was found to be more frequent in erSLE (OR = 1.184, 95 %CI = 1.063–1.318, p = 0.0021). 32 studies included data on leukopenia and the frequency was higher in erSLE (OR: 1.338, 95 %CI: 1.22–1.47, p < 0.0001). Lymphadenopathy was more prevalent in erSLE (OR = 2.32, 95 % CI = 1.61–3.34, p < 0.0001). No significant difference was observed in thrombosis and TP frequency between the two groups.

Conclusion

Attributing hematological findings to SLE in late-onset patients presents challenges due to comorbidities and polypharmacy. Overall, the frequencies of AIHA, lymphopenia, leukopenia, and lymphadenopathy were more common in erSLE patients compared to ltSLE in this study.
晚发型和早发型狼疮中的血液优势疾病:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
研究目的许多研究探讨了早发性系统性红斑狼疮(erSLE)(年龄小于50岁)和晚发性系统性红斑狼疮(ltSLE)(年龄大于50岁)患者的血液学表现,结果各不相同。本研究采用荟萃分析法来研究ltSLE和erSLE在血液学表现方面的差异:方法:纳入调查ltSLE患者血液学表现频率的研究。比较了erSLE组和ltSLE组患者出现自身免疫性溶血性贫血(AIHA)、血小板减少症(TP)、淋巴细胞减少症、白细胞减少症、淋巴腺病和血栓形成的频率。两位作者独立审阅并评估了摘要、表格和文本中数据的一致性,以减少偏倚。利用森林图比较了不同年龄组血液学表现的几率比(95 % CI),并利用 I2 评估了研究的异质性:分析包括39项符合条件的研究,共涉及19103名系统性红斑狼疮患者(其中红斑狼疮患者16314人,慢性系统性红斑狼疮患者2789人)。在这些研究中,有28项研究报告了AIHA,发现AIHA在erSLE中更为常见(OR = 1.29, 95 %CI = 1.11-1.39, p = 0.0008)。20项研究提供了淋巴细胞减少症的数据,发现该病在erSLE中更为常见(OR = 1.184, 95 %CI = 1.063-1.318, p = 0.0021)。32项研究纳入了白细胞减少症的数据,其发生率在系统性红斑狼疮中更高(OR:1.338,95 %CI:1.22-1.47,p 结论:将血液学结果归因于系统性红斑狼疮是错误的:由于合并症和多药并存,将晚发性患者的血液学结果归因于系统性红斑狼疮是一项挑战。总体而言,与慢毒性系统性红斑狼疮相比,晚发性系统性红斑狼疮患者出现AIHA、淋巴细胞减少症、白细胞减少症和淋巴腺病的频率更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Autoimmunity reviews
Autoimmunity reviews 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
24.70
自引率
4.40%
发文量
164
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: Autoimmunity Reviews is a publication that features up-to-date, structured reviews on various topics in the field of autoimmunity. These reviews are written by renowned experts and include demonstrative illustrations and tables. Each article will have a clear "take-home" message for readers. The selection of articles is primarily done by the Editors-in-Chief, based on recommendations from the international Editorial Board. The topics covered in the articles span all areas of autoimmunology, aiming to bridge the gap between basic and clinical sciences. In terms of content, the contributions in basic sciences delve into the pathophysiology and mechanisms of autoimmune disorders, as well as genomics and proteomics. On the other hand, clinical contributions focus on diseases related to autoimmunity, novel therapies, and clinical associations. Autoimmunity Reviews is internationally recognized, and its articles are indexed and abstracted in prestigious databases such as PubMed/Medline, Science Citation Index Expanded, Biosciences Information Services, and Chemical Abstracts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信