S Garcia-Valdecasas, S Lapeña-Garcia, M Ruiz-Alvarez, T Costales-Lucia, A Moreno-Romero, S Molina-Blas, M Barrionuevo-Gonzalez
{"title":"B-010 Intercomparison Study of Methods between Atellica Solution® and CI® Analyzers for Sodium, Potassium, and Chloride","authors":"S Garcia-Valdecasas, S Lapeña-Garcia, M Ruiz-Alvarez, T Costales-Lucia, A Moreno-Romero, S Molina-Blas, M Barrionuevo-Gonzalez","doi":"10.1093/clinchem/hvae106.374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Method verification is an essential analysis routinely conducted in accredited Clinical Laboratories whenever a change of method or instrument for a specific analyte is desired. Objectives The aim of the study is to verify that the results measured by the Atellica Solution® analyzer (Siemens) and the new CI® analyzer (Siemens) for Sodium, Potassium, and Chloride are interchangeable. Methods To conduct the intercomparison study of Sodium, Potassium, and Chloride, the techniques were properly calibrated and controlled on both analyzers. For each assay, 40 patient samples were selected, covering the entire measurement range, and analyzed by both instruments. To determine the degree of agreement between the instruments, a Bland Altman analysis of mean differences and a Passing Bablok regression were performed. Statistics are expressed with their 95% confidence intervals (CI). The evaluation of results was carried out using the statistical program Method Validator. Results In both the Bland-Altman and Passing Bablok regression analyses, a slight constant systematic error was detected for all three assays, as the 95% confidence interval of the observed mean difference and the 95% confidence interval of the intercept of the regression line do not include zero. No systematic proportional differences were observed based on the slope, as the 95% confidence interval includes the value one Conclusions The small constant systematic differences found in the analyses should be re-evaluated after performing a new calibration of the methods. In none of the cases are the differences clinically significant, as they do not exceed the total error established in our quality specification. Therefore, it can be concluded that the Atellica Solution® and CI 1900® analyzers are interchangeable for Sodium, Potassium, and Chloride assays","PeriodicalId":10690,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvae106.374","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background Method verification is an essential analysis routinely conducted in accredited Clinical Laboratories whenever a change of method or instrument for a specific analyte is desired. Objectives The aim of the study is to verify that the results measured by the Atellica Solution® analyzer (Siemens) and the new CI® analyzer (Siemens) for Sodium, Potassium, and Chloride are interchangeable. Methods To conduct the intercomparison study of Sodium, Potassium, and Chloride, the techniques were properly calibrated and controlled on both analyzers. For each assay, 40 patient samples were selected, covering the entire measurement range, and analyzed by both instruments. To determine the degree of agreement between the instruments, a Bland Altman analysis of mean differences and a Passing Bablok regression were performed. Statistics are expressed with their 95% confidence intervals (CI). The evaluation of results was carried out using the statistical program Method Validator. Results In both the Bland-Altman and Passing Bablok regression analyses, a slight constant systematic error was detected for all three assays, as the 95% confidence interval of the observed mean difference and the 95% confidence interval of the intercept of the regression line do not include zero. No systematic proportional differences were observed based on the slope, as the 95% confidence interval includes the value one Conclusions The small constant systematic differences found in the analyses should be re-evaluated after performing a new calibration of the methods. In none of the cases are the differences clinically significant, as they do not exceed the total error established in our quality specification. Therefore, it can be concluded that the Atellica Solution® and CI 1900® analyzers are interchangeable for Sodium, Potassium, and Chloride assays
期刊介绍:
Clinical Chemistry is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that is the premier publication for the science and practice of clinical laboratory medicine. It was established in 1955 and is associated with the Association for Diagnostics & Laboratory Medicine (ADLM).
The journal focuses on laboratory diagnosis and management of patients, and has expanded to include other clinical laboratory disciplines such as genomics, hematology, microbiology, and toxicology. It also publishes articles relevant to clinical specialties including cardiology, endocrinology, gastroenterology, genetics, immunology, infectious diseases, maternal-fetal medicine, neurology, nutrition, oncology, and pediatrics.
In addition to original research, editorials, and reviews, Clinical Chemistry features recurring sections such as clinical case studies, perspectives, podcasts, and Q&A articles. It has the highest impact factor among journals of clinical chemistry, laboratory medicine, pathology, analytical chemistry, transfusion medicine, and clinical microbiology.
The journal is indexed in databases such as MEDLINE and Web of Science.