Recurrence pattern of glioblastoma treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy versus three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy.

Radiation oncology journal Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-26 DOI:10.3857/roj.2024.00381
So Hwa Mun, Hong Seok Jang, Byung Ok Choi, Shin Woo Kim, Jin-Ho Song
{"title":"Recurrence pattern of glioblastoma treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy versus three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy.","authors":"So Hwa Mun, Hong Seok Jang, Byung Ok Choi, Shin Woo Kim, Jin-Ho Song","doi":"10.3857/roj.2024.00381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate recurrence patterns of and survival outcomes in glioblastoma treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) versus three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We retrospectively examined 91 patients with glioblastoma treated with either IMRT (n = 60) or 3D-CRT (n = 31) between January 2013 and December 2019. Magnetic resonance imaging showing tumor recurrence and planning computed tomography scans were fused for analyzing recurrence patterns categorized as in-field, marginal, and out-of-field based on their relation to the initial radiation field.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median overall survival (OS) was 18.9 months, with no significant difference between the groups. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 9.4 months, with no significant difference between the groups. Patients who underwent gross total resection (GTR) had higher OS and PFS than those who underwent less extensive surgery. Among 78 relapse cases, 67 were of in-field; 5, marginal; and 19, out-of-field recurrence. Among 3D-CRT-treated cases, 24 were of in-field; 1, marginal; and 9, out-of-field recurrence. Among IMRT-treated cases, 43 were of in-field; 4, marginal; and 10, out-of-field recurrence. In partial tumor removal or biopsy cases, out-of-field recurrence was less frequent in the IMRT (16.2%) than in the 3D-CRT (36.3%) group, with marginal significance (p = 0.079).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IMRT and 3D-CRT effectively managed glioblastoma with no significant differences in OS and PFS. The survival benefit with GTR underscored the importance of maximal surgical resection. The reduced rate of out-of-field recurrence in IMRT-treated patients with partial resection highlights its potential utility in cases with unfeasible complete tumor removal.</p>","PeriodicalId":94184,"journal":{"name":"Radiation oncology journal","volume":"42 3","pages":"218-227"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11467484/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation oncology journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3857/roj.2024.00381","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate recurrence patterns of and survival outcomes in glioblastoma treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) versus three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT).

Materials and methods: We retrospectively examined 91 patients with glioblastoma treated with either IMRT (n = 60) or 3D-CRT (n = 31) between January 2013 and December 2019. Magnetic resonance imaging showing tumor recurrence and planning computed tomography scans were fused for analyzing recurrence patterns categorized as in-field, marginal, and out-of-field based on their relation to the initial radiation field.

Results: The median overall survival (OS) was 18.9 months, with no significant difference between the groups. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 9.4 months, with no significant difference between the groups. Patients who underwent gross total resection (GTR) had higher OS and PFS than those who underwent less extensive surgery. Among 78 relapse cases, 67 were of in-field; 5, marginal; and 19, out-of-field recurrence. Among 3D-CRT-treated cases, 24 were of in-field; 1, marginal; and 9, out-of-field recurrence. Among IMRT-treated cases, 43 were of in-field; 4, marginal; and 10, out-of-field recurrence. In partial tumor removal or biopsy cases, out-of-field recurrence was less frequent in the IMRT (16.2%) than in the 3D-CRT (36.3%) group, with marginal significance (p = 0.079).

Conclusion: IMRT and 3D-CRT effectively managed glioblastoma with no significant differences in OS and PFS. The survival benefit with GTR underscored the importance of maximal surgical resection. The reduced rate of out-of-field recurrence in IMRT-treated patients with partial resection highlights its potential utility in cases with unfeasible complete tumor removal.

采用调强放射疗法与三维适形放射疗法治疗胶质母细胞瘤的复发模式。
目的:评估采用调强放射治疗(IMRT)与三维适形放射治疗(3D-CRT)治疗胶质母细胞瘤的复发模式和生存结果:我们回顾性研究了2013年1月至2019年12月期间接受IMRT(60例)或3D-CRT(31例)治疗的91例胶质母细胞瘤患者。融合显示肿瘤复发的磁共振成像和计划计算机断层扫描,分析根据与初始辐射场的关系分为场内、边缘和场外的复发模式:中位总生存期(OS)为18.9个月,组间无显著差异。中位无进展生存期(PFS)为 9.4 个月,组间无明显差异。与手术范围较小的患者相比,接受大面积全切除术(GTR)的患者的OS和PFS更高。在78例复发病例中,场内复发67例,边缘复发5例,场外复发19例。在接受3D-CRT治疗的病例中,场内复发24例,边缘复发1例,场外复发9例。在IMRT治疗的病例中,场内复发43例,边缘复发4例,场外复发10例。在肿瘤部分切除或活检病例中,IMRT组(16.2%)的场外复发率低于3D-CRT组(36.3%),差异有学意义(P = 0.079):结论:IMRT和3D-CRT可有效治疗胶质母细胞瘤,在OS和PFS方面无显著差异。GTR的生存获益强调了最大限度手术切除的重要性。IMRT治疗的部分切除患者的视野外复发率降低,这凸显了IMRT在无法完全切除肿瘤的病例中的潜在作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信