Development of a Prioritized Anesthesiology Residency Critical Care Content Outline.

Jason Brainard, Sarah Alber, Andrew G Smith, Genie E Roosevelt, Matt Rustici
{"title":"Development of a Prioritized Anesthesiology Residency Critical Care Content Outline.","authors":"Jason Brainard, Sarah Alber, Andrew G Smith, Genie E Roosevelt, Matt Rustici","doi":"10.46374/VolXXVI_Issue3_Brainard","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Critical care education is an important, mandatory component of residency training in anesthesiology. Currently, there is no accepted national standardized curriculum, and a prioritized critical care content outline would be beneficial to the creation of a pragmatic standardized residency curriculum. The modified Delphi method is a recognized method for establishing consensus in medical education.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed a prioritized critical care content outline using the modified Delphi method. Topics were selected from critical care topics included in the Program Requirements for Graduate Medical Education in Anesthesiology and the American Board of Anesthesiology Content Outline. Panel members rated critical care topics on a 9-point Likert scale (<i>1 = not important, 9 = mandatory</i>). Consensus was defined as ≥75% rating the topic as very important to mandatory for inclusion (Likert scale 7-9). Topics with >80% consensus were removed from subsequent surveys and included in the final list, and topics with <50% were removed. Members were asked to select the ideal timing of topic delivery during residency (Foundational-Early Residency, Intermediate-Mid Residency, Advanced-Late Residency).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 158 panel members who were contacted using national anesthesiology organization email lists completed the initial round, 119 (75%) completed the second iteration, and 116 (73%) completed the third. Response rate on the first survey was (22/55) 40% for anesthesiology critical care program directors, (18/132) 14% for core anesthesiology residency program directors, and (77/1150) 7% for the remaining respondents. Trainees (n = 41) were not included in response rate calculations. Most participants (103/158, 65%) had completed both core anesthesiology and subspecialty critical care medicine training and most (87/158, 55%) had formal roles in medical education. Forty-one (26%) responders were currently in training. All panelists worked in institutions with graduate medical education (GME) learners. Fifty-eight of 136 (43%) topics met consensus for inclusion. Most consensus topics (50/58, 86%) were recommended to be delivered early during residency with the other 8 topics to be delivered in the middle of residency.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We developed a prioritized critical care content outline for anesthesiology residents that includes highly recommended critical care topics with ideal timing for inclusion in residency. This outline provides the first step in developing a pragmatic standardized curriculum to guide faculty and programs in critical care education.</p>","PeriodicalId":75067,"journal":{"name":"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM","volume":"26 3","pages":"E728"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11441633/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46374/VolXXVI_Issue3_Brainard","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Critical care education is an important, mandatory component of residency training in anesthesiology. Currently, there is no accepted national standardized curriculum, and a prioritized critical care content outline would be beneficial to the creation of a pragmatic standardized residency curriculum. The modified Delphi method is a recognized method for establishing consensus in medical education.

Methods: We developed a prioritized critical care content outline using the modified Delphi method. Topics were selected from critical care topics included in the Program Requirements for Graduate Medical Education in Anesthesiology and the American Board of Anesthesiology Content Outline. Panel members rated critical care topics on a 9-point Likert scale (1 = not important, 9 = mandatory). Consensus was defined as ≥75% rating the topic as very important to mandatory for inclusion (Likert scale 7-9). Topics with >80% consensus were removed from subsequent surveys and included in the final list, and topics with <50% were removed. Members were asked to select the ideal timing of topic delivery during residency (Foundational-Early Residency, Intermediate-Mid Residency, Advanced-Late Residency).

Results: A total of 158 panel members who were contacted using national anesthesiology organization email lists completed the initial round, 119 (75%) completed the second iteration, and 116 (73%) completed the third. Response rate on the first survey was (22/55) 40% for anesthesiology critical care program directors, (18/132) 14% for core anesthesiology residency program directors, and (77/1150) 7% for the remaining respondents. Trainees (n = 41) were not included in response rate calculations. Most participants (103/158, 65%) had completed both core anesthesiology and subspecialty critical care medicine training and most (87/158, 55%) had formal roles in medical education. Forty-one (26%) responders were currently in training. All panelists worked in institutions with graduate medical education (GME) learners. Fifty-eight of 136 (43%) topics met consensus for inclusion. Most consensus topics (50/58, 86%) were recommended to be delivered early during residency with the other 8 topics to be delivered in the middle of residency.

Conclusions: We developed a prioritized critical care content outline for anesthesiology residents that includes highly recommended critical care topics with ideal timing for inclusion in residency. This outline provides the first step in developing a pragmatic standardized curriculum to guide faculty and programs in critical care education.

制定麻醉学住院医师重症监护优先内容大纲。
背景:重症监护教育是麻醉学住院医师培训的重要必修内容。目前,还没有公认的全国性标准化课程,而优先考虑重症监护内容的大纲将有利于创建实用的标准化住院医师培训课程。改良德尔菲法是医学教育中公认的建立共识的方法:方法:我们采用改良德尔菲法制定了重症监护内容优先级大纲。我们从《麻醉学研究生医学教育课程要求》和《美国麻醉学委员会内容大纲》中的重症监护主题中选取了一些主题。专家组成员以 9 分李克特量表(1 = 不重要,9 = 必须)对危重症护理主题进行评分。共识的定义是:≥75% 的成员认为该主题非常重要或必须纳入(李克特量表 7-9)。共识度>80%的主题将从后续调查中剔除,并纳入最终列表,而结果为>80%的主题将从后续调查中剔除,并纳入最终列表:通过国家麻醉组织电子邮件列表联系到的 158 名专家组成员完成了第一轮调查,119 人(75%)完成了第二轮调查,116 人(73%)完成了第三轮调查。第一轮调查中,麻醉重症监护项目主任的回复率为(22/55)40%,核心麻醉住院医生项目主任的回复率为(18/132)14%,其余受访者的回复率为(77/1150)7%。受训人员(n = 41)不包括在回复率计算中。大多数参与者(103/158,65%)都完成了核心麻醉学和亚专科重症医学培训,大多数参与者(87/158,55%)都在医学教育中担任过正式职务。有 41 位(26%)受访者目前正在接受培训。所有小组成员都在有研究生医学教育(GME)学员的机构工作。在 136 个主题中,有 58 个(43%)符合纳入共识。大多数达成共识的主题(50/58,86%)被建议在住院医师培训的早期进行讲授,另外 8 个主题则在住院医师培训的中期进行讲授:结论:我们为麻醉科住院医师制定了重症监护内容优先级大纲,其中包括强烈推荐的重症监护主题,以及纳入住院医师培训的理想时间。该大纲为开发实用的标准化课程以指导重症监护教育的教师和项目迈出了第一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信