Efficacy and safety of intralesional triamcinolone acetonide alone and its combination with 5- fluorouracil in keloids and hypertrophic scars: Randomized, parallel group, and double blinded trial.

Q3 Medicine
Skin health and disease Pub Date : 2024-08-24 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1002/ski2.450
Ripala Acharya, Sudha Agrawal, Dhan Keshar Khadka, Aashish Raj Pant
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of intralesional triamcinolone acetonide alone and its combination with 5- fluorouracil in keloids and hypertrophic scars: Randomized, parallel group, and double blinded trial.","authors":"Ripala Acharya, Sudha Agrawal, Dhan Keshar Khadka, Aashish Raj Pant","doi":"10.1002/ski2.450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scars is challenging. The current first-line treatment is a steroid which has high resistance and recurrence rate along with unacceptable adverse effects. Different studies involving the combination of TAC and 5-FU that have been done so far showed better treatment outcomes in terms of efficacy and safety.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of intralesional triamcinolone acetonide alone and its combination with 5-fluorouracil in patients with keloids and hypertrophic scars at 12 weeks follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized parallel group double-blinded clinical trial, we enroled 66 cases of keloids and hypertrophic scars randomly allocated into two treatment groups. Patients received an intralesional injection of triamcinolone acetonide (20 mg/mL) in Group A and an intralesional injection of a combination of triamcinolone acetonide (20 mg/mL) and 5-fluorouracil (25 mg/mL) in Group B for every 2 weeks until 10 weeks and the final evaluation was done at 12 weeks follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a reduction in all the parameters at every follow-up visit in both groups. The ≥50% reduction in height, reduction in the VSS and POSAS scores, and good to excellent subjective improvement reported by both the patients and the observer were significantly greater in the combination group compared to TAC alone group. The response rate was faster and complications were lesser in the combination group as compared to TAC alone group.</p><p><strong>Limitation: </strong>Single-centred, no long-term follow-up, and recurrence could not be assessed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TAC alone and its combination with the 5-FU both were effective in keloids and hypertrophic scars. Yet, the TAC and 5-FU combination treatment was more efficacious with a faster response rate and safer than the TAC alone treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":74804,"journal":{"name":"Skin health and disease","volume":"4 5","pages":"e450"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11442070/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Skin health and disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ski2.450","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scars is challenging. The current first-line treatment is a steroid which has high resistance and recurrence rate along with unacceptable adverse effects. Different studies involving the combination of TAC and 5-FU that have been done so far showed better treatment outcomes in terms of efficacy and safety.

Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of intralesional triamcinolone acetonide alone and its combination with 5-fluorouracil in patients with keloids and hypertrophic scars at 12 weeks follow-up.

Methods: In this randomized parallel group double-blinded clinical trial, we enroled 66 cases of keloids and hypertrophic scars randomly allocated into two treatment groups. Patients received an intralesional injection of triamcinolone acetonide (20 mg/mL) in Group A and an intralesional injection of a combination of triamcinolone acetonide (20 mg/mL) and 5-fluorouracil (25 mg/mL) in Group B for every 2 weeks until 10 weeks and the final evaluation was done at 12 weeks follow-up.

Results: There was a reduction in all the parameters at every follow-up visit in both groups. The ≥50% reduction in height, reduction in the VSS and POSAS scores, and good to excellent subjective improvement reported by both the patients and the observer were significantly greater in the combination group compared to TAC alone group. The response rate was faster and complications were lesser in the combination group as compared to TAC alone group.

Limitation: Single-centred, no long-term follow-up, and recurrence could not be assessed.

Conclusion: TAC alone and its combination with the 5-FU both were effective in keloids and hypertrophic scars. Yet, the TAC and 5-FU combination treatment was more efficacious with a faster response rate and safer than the TAC alone treatment.

瘢痕疙瘩和增生性疤痕单用和联合使用三苯氧胺醋酸钙的疗效和安全性:随机、平行分组和双盲试验。
背景:瘢痕疙瘩和增生性疤痕的治疗具有挑战性。目前的一线治疗方法是类固醇激素,但其耐药性和复发率较高,且存在不可接受的不良反应。迄今为止,涉及 TAC 和 5-FU 组合的不同研究显示,在疗效和安全性方面,治疗效果更好:本研究的目的是比较瘢痕疙瘩和增生性疤痕患者在12周随访时单独使用和联合使用曲安奈德及其与5-氟尿嘧啶的疗效和安全性:在这项随机平行组双盲临床试验中,我们招募了66例瘢痕疙瘩和增生性疤痕患者,随机分为两个治疗组。A组患者接受曲安奈德(20毫克/毫升)鞘内注射,B组患者接受曲安奈德(20毫克/毫升)和5-氟尿嘧啶(25毫克/毫升)联合鞘内注射,每2周注射一次,直至10周,12周后进行最终评估:结果:两组患者在每次随访时所有指标均有所下降。与单用 TAC 组相比,联合用药组的身高降低≥50%,VSS 和 POSAS 评分降低,患者和观察者均报告主观改善良好至极佳。与单纯 TAC 组相比,联合治疗组的反应速度更快,并发症更少:局限性:单中心,无长期随访,无法评估复发情况:结论:单独使用TAC和联合使用5-FU对瘢痕疙瘩和增生性疤痕均有效。结论:TAC单独治疗和与5-FU联合治疗对瘢痕疙瘩和增生性疤痕均有效,但TAC和5-FU联合治疗比TAC单独治疗疗效更好、反应更快、更安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信