Age-dependent prevalence of malocclusions requiring treatment according to the KIG classification : A multipart cross-sectional study over a 10-year period from the district of Viersen/North Rhine.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Gero Stefan Michael Kinzinger, Jan Hourfar, Andrijana Maletic, Jörg Alexander Lisson
{"title":"Age-dependent prevalence of malocclusions requiring treatment according to the KIG classification : A multipart cross-sectional study over a 10-year period from the district of Viersen/North Rhine.","authors":"Gero Stefan Michael Kinzinger, Jan Hourfar, Andrijana Maletic, Jörg Alexander Lisson","doi":"10.1007/s00056-024-00550-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Patients with statutory health insurance (SHI) in Germany must undergo an assessment of orthodontic treatment need using the \"Kieferorthopädische Indikationsgruppen\" (KIG; orthodontic indication groups) classification system since 2002. A treatment need only exists if anomalies of a certain degree of severity are present. The aim of this study was to evaluate the age-dependent prevalence and percentage distribution of KIG grades requiring treatment in patients with SHI before the age of 18 over a 10-year period.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Between 2012 and 2021, treatment indication existed for 1951 (1025 female, 926 male) out of 2288 patients with SHI in the cohort of this study before the age of 18 according to current SHI guidelines. The KIG classification was based on the highest existing KIG grade. There were no multiple classifications. The patient cohort was divided into three patient groups (PG) according to chronological age for analysis: PG 1 < 10 years of age (early treatment), PG 2 10 to < 13 years of age (main treatment) and PG 3 13 to < 18 years of age (late treatment).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In PG 1 (454 patients), the KIG classifications D (26.5%), K (25.5%), M (19.4%), and P (18.0%) dominated. In PG 2 (998 patients), classifications D (33.2%), predominated, whereas K (7.5%) and M (5.9%) rarely occurred. The classifications E (12.6%) and P (13.3%) appeared quite frequently. Transverse deviations occurred only about half as often in PG 2 as in PG 1 and PG 3. In PG 3 (499 patients), the classification E (17.6%) was particularly common, while P (2.6%) was rare. The proportion of KIG grades 5 decreased depending on age: 19% in PG 1, 13.5% in PG 2, 10.4% in PG 3. The prevalence of sagittal classifications was highest in all age groups (45.9% in PG 1, 39.1% in PG 2, 31.5% in PG 3).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The distribution of KIG classifications requiring treatment was not homogeneous, but age dependent. The differences were particularly evident in the early treatment group and may be due to the limited applicability of the KIG classification system in patients before late mixed dentition. With increasing age at initial examination, the prevalence of sagittal classifications decreased, while that of vertical classifications increased. Still, the sagittal classifications D and M occurred most frequently in all age groups. The KIG classification D was always the most common in all patients until the age of 18.</p>","PeriodicalId":54776,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics-Fortschritte Der Kieferorthopadie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics-Fortschritte Der Kieferorthopadie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-024-00550-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aim: Patients with statutory health insurance (SHI) in Germany must undergo an assessment of orthodontic treatment need using the "Kieferorthopädische Indikationsgruppen" (KIG; orthodontic indication groups) classification system since 2002. A treatment need only exists if anomalies of a certain degree of severity are present. The aim of this study was to evaluate the age-dependent prevalence and percentage distribution of KIG grades requiring treatment in patients with SHI before the age of 18 over a 10-year period.

Patients and methods: Between 2012 and 2021, treatment indication existed for 1951 (1025 female, 926 male) out of 2288 patients with SHI in the cohort of this study before the age of 18 according to current SHI guidelines. The KIG classification was based on the highest existing KIG grade. There were no multiple classifications. The patient cohort was divided into three patient groups (PG) according to chronological age for analysis: PG 1 < 10 years of age (early treatment), PG 2 10 to < 13 years of age (main treatment) and PG 3 13 to < 18 years of age (late treatment).

Results: In PG 1 (454 patients), the KIG classifications D (26.5%), K (25.5%), M (19.4%), and P (18.0%) dominated. In PG 2 (998 patients), classifications D (33.2%), predominated, whereas K (7.5%) and M (5.9%) rarely occurred. The classifications E (12.6%) and P (13.3%) appeared quite frequently. Transverse deviations occurred only about half as often in PG 2 as in PG 1 and PG 3. In PG 3 (499 patients), the classification E (17.6%) was particularly common, while P (2.6%) was rare. The proportion of KIG grades 5 decreased depending on age: 19% in PG 1, 13.5% in PG 2, 10.4% in PG 3. The prevalence of sagittal classifications was highest in all age groups (45.9% in PG 1, 39.1% in PG 2, 31.5% in PG 3).

Conclusions: The distribution of KIG classifications requiring treatment was not homogeneous, but age dependent. The differences were particularly evident in the early treatment group and may be due to the limited applicability of the KIG classification system in patients before late mixed dentition. With increasing age at initial examination, the prevalence of sagittal classifications decreased, while that of vertical classifications increased. Still, the sagittal classifications D and M occurred most frequently in all age groups. The KIG classification D was always the most common in all patients until the age of 18.

根据 KIG 分类法,需要治疗的错颌畸形的发生率与年龄有关:在维耶森/北莱茵地区进行的一项为期 10 年的多部分横断面研究。
背景和目的:自 2002 年起,德国法定医疗保险(SHI)患者必须使用 "Kieferorthopädische Indikationsgruppen"(KIG;正畸适应症分组)分类系统对正畸治疗需求进行评估。只有存在一定严重程度的畸形,才有治疗需求。这项研究的目的是评估 18 岁前 SHI 患者在 10 年内需要治疗的 KIG 等级的流行率和百分比分布情况:2012年至2021年期间,根据现行的SHI指南,本研究队列中的2288名18岁前SHI患者中有1951人(女性1025人,男性926人)有治疗指征。KIG 分级基于现有的最高 KIG 等级。没有多重分类。根据患者的实际年龄将其分为三组(PG)进行分析:PG 1 结果:在 PG 1 组(454 名患者)中,KIG 分级以 D 级(26.5%)、K 级(25.5%)、M 级(19.4%)和 P 级(18.0%)为主。在 PG 2(998 名患者)中,分类 D(33.2%)占主导地位,而 K(7.5%)和 M(5.9%)很少出现。E类(12.6%)和P类(13.3%)出现的频率很高。横向偏差在 PG 2 中的发生率仅为 PG 1 和 PG 3 的一半左右。 在 PG 3(499 名患者)中,E 级(17.6%)尤为常见,而 P 级(2.6%)则很少见。KIG 5 级的比例随年龄而降低:PG 1 为 19%,PG 2 为 13.5%,PG 3 为 10.4%。在所有年龄组中,矢状面分级的发生率最高(PG 1 为 45.9%,PG 2 为 39.1%,PG 3 为 31.5%):结论:需要治疗的 KIG 分级分布并不均匀,而是与年龄有关。结论:需要治疗的 KIG 分级分布并不均匀,而是与年龄有关,早期治疗组的差异尤为明显,这可能是由于 KIG 分级系统对晚期混合牙列前患者的适用性有限。随着初次检查时年龄的增加,矢状分类的发生率下降,而垂直分类的发生率上升。不过,在所有年龄组中,矢状面分类 D 和 M 的发生率最高。在 18 岁之前的所有患者中,KIG 分级 D 总是最常见的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics provides orthodontists and dentists who are also actively interested in orthodontics, whether in university clinics or private practice, with highly authoritative and up-to-date information based on experimental and clinical research. The journal is one of the leading publications for the promulgation of the results of original work both in the areas of scientific and clinical orthodontics and related areas. All articles undergo peer review before publication. The German Society of Orthodontics (DGKFO) also publishes in the journal important communications, statements and announcements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信