A novel technique for C1-C2 posterior screw insertion using patient-specific guides created by CT-based 3D printing.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Yujiro Kagami, Hiroaki Nakashima, Naoki Segi, Sadayuki Ito, Jun Ouchida, Ryuichi Shinjo, Shiro Imagama
{"title":"A novel technique for C1-C2 posterior screw insertion using patient-specific guides created by CT-based 3D printing.","authors":"Yujiro Kagami, Hiroaki Nakashima, Naoki Segi, Sadayuki Ito, Jun Ouchida, Ryuichi Shinjo, Shiro Imagama","doi":"10.18999/nagjms.86.3.487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>C1-C2 fixation has been developed for the rigid fusion of atlantoaxial instability. C1 lateral mass screw (C1 LMS)-C2 pedicle screw fixation is used more frequently due to its rigid fixation and high bone fusion rate. However, C1 screw placement is relatively unsafe even with recently developed image-based navigation systems. Patient-specific screw guide templates (PSGT) were developed to improve the accuracy and safety of C1 screw placement. Herein, we investigated the outcomes of the C1-C2 posterior fixation technique using PSGT. This was a retrospective study of six patients who underwent posterior cervical spinal fusion using the PSGT between January 2022 and April 2023. Operative time, estimated blood loss, intraoperative radiation dose, surgical cost, and screw placement accuracy were evaluated and compared with those achieved with preoperative CT-based navigation (navigation group, n = 15). Screw accuracy was assessed using Neo's classification. PSGT showed good results, although the differences were not statistically significant (operation time: 104.3 ± 9.7 min vs 116.4 ± 20.8 min; estimated blood loss: 56.7 ± 72.4 mL vs 123.2 ± 162.3 mL; and radiation dose: 1.8 ± 1.2 mSv vs 2.6 ± 0.8 mSv, respectively). PSGT was particularly better in terms of the accuracy of C1 LMS (PSGT: 100%, navigation: 83.3%). The deviation at the entry point was minimal, and the difference between the sagittal and transversal angles from the preoperative plan was small. We investigated the clinical efficacy of using the PSGT for C1-C2 posterior fixation. PSGT improved the accuracy of C1 LMS insertion.</p>","PeriodicalId":49014,"journal":{"name":"Nagoya Journal of Medical Science","volume":"86 3","pages":"487-496"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11439603/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nagoya Journal of Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18999/nagjms.86.3.487","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

C1-C2 fixation has been developed for the rigid fusion of atlantoaxial instability. C1 lateral mass screw (C1 LMS)-C2 pedicle screw fixation is used more frequently due to its rigid fixation and high bone fusion rate. However, C1 screw placement is relatively unsafe even with recently developed image-based navigation systems. Patient-specific screw guide templates (PSGT) were developed to improve the accuracy and safety of C1 screw placement. Herein, we investigated the outcomes of the C1-C2 posterior fixation technique using PSGT. This was a retrospective study of six patients who underwent posterior cervical spinal fusion using the PSGT between January 2022 and April 2023. Operative time, estimated blood loss, intraoperative radiation dose, surgical cost, and screw placement accuracy were evaluated and compared with those achieved with preoperative CT-based navigation (navigation group, n = 15). Screw accuracy was assessed using Neo's classification. PSGT showed good results, although the differences were not statistically significant (operation time: 104.3 ± 9.7 min vs 116.4 ± 20.8 min; estimated blood loss: 56.7 ± 72.4 mL vs 123.2 ± 162.3 mL; and radiation dose: 1.8 ± 1.2 mSv vs 2.6 ± 0.8 mSv, respectively). PSGT was particularly better in terms of the accuracy of C1 LMS (PSGT: 100%, navigation: 83.3%). The deviation at the entry point was minimal, and the difference between the sagittal and transversal angles from the preoperative plan was small. We investigated the clinical efficacy of using the PSGT for C1-C2 posterior fixation. PSGT improved the accuracy of C1 LMS insertion.

利用基于 CT 的 3D 打印技术创建的患者特异性导板,采用新技术插入 C1-C2 后螺钉。
C1-C2 固定术是为寰枢椎不稳定的刚性融合而开发的。C1 侧块螺钉(C1 LMS)-C2椎弓根螺钉固定术因其刚性固定和高骨融合率而被更多使用。然而,即使使用最近开发的基于图像的导航系统,C1螺钉置放也相对不安全。为了提高C1螺钉置入的准确性和安全性,我们开发了患者特异性螺钉导向模板(PSGT)。在此,我们研究了使用 PSGT 的 C1-C2 后固定技术的效果。这是一项回顾性研究,研究对象是2022年1月至2023年4月期间使用PSGT进行颈椎后路融合术的六名患者。研究评估了手术时间、估计失血量、术中辐射剂量、手术成本和螺钉置入的准确性,并将其与术前基于CT的导航(导航组,n = 15)进行了比较。螺钉准确性采用尼欧分类法进行评估。PSGT 显示了良好的效果,尽管差异没有统计学意义(手术时间:104.3 ± 9.7 分钟 vs 116.4 ± 20.8 分钟;估计失血量:56.7 ± 72.4 毫升):56.7 ± 72.4 mL vs 123.2 ± 162.3 mL;辐射剂量:1.8 ± 1.2 mSv vs 2.6 ± 0.8 mSv)。就 C1 LMS 的准确性而言,PSGT 尤为出色(PSGT:100%,导航:83.3%)。进入点的偏差很小,矢状角和横向角与术前计划的差异也很小。我们研究了使用 PSGT 进行 C1-C2 后固定的临床疗效。PSGT 提高了 C1 LMS 插入的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nagoya Journal of Medical Science
Nagoya Journal of Medical Science MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes original papers in the areas of medical science and its related fields. Reviews, symposium reports, short communications, notes, case reports, hypothesis papers, medical image at a glance, video and announcements are also accepted. Manuscripts should be in English. It is recommended that an English check of the manuscript by a competent and knowledgeable native speaker be completed before submission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信