Comparative Assessment of Antimicrobial Activity of Propolis and Chlorhexidine on Salivary Isolates of Candida albicans and Streptococcus mutans in Children with Severe Early Childhood Caries: An In Vitro Study.

Q3 Dentistry
Venkatesh Kodgi, Priya Shetty, Charisma Thimmaiah, Nithya Annie Thomas, Bettina Ashwini Vergis, Kaushik Shetty
{"title":"Comparative Assessment of Antimicrobial Activity of Propolis and Chlorhexidine on Salivary Isolates of <i>Candida albicans</i> and <i>Streptococcus mutans</i> in Children with Severe Early Childhood Caries: An <i>In Vitro</i> Study.","authors":"Venkatesh Kodgi, Priya Shetty, Charisma Thimmaiah, Nithya Annie Thomas, Bettina Ashwini Vergis, Kaushik Shetty","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong><i>Streptococcus mutans</i> and <i>Candida albicans</i> are the chief microbes associated with severe early childhood caries (S-ECC). Diverse antimicrobial agents are widely used to prevent ECC, and a quest for newer natural products has been on the rise in the recent past.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To estimate the antimicrobial activity of propolis with chlorhexidine on salivary specimens from children with S-ECC <i>in vitro</i>.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 60 children with S-ECC were designated. Salivary samples of 30 children (group I) were inoculated onto mitis salivarius agar (MSA) to isolate <i>S. mutans</i>. Another 30 samples (group II) were inoculated on sabouraud's dextrose agar and subcultured on HiCrome <i>Candida</i> differential agar to isolate <i>C. albicans</i>. Sensitivity testing for 0.2% chlorhexidine and 10% propolis extract was done using the agar well diffusion technique using Mueller-Hinton agar medium. The antimicrobial effect was evaluated by calculating the diameter of the zone of inhibition surrounding the well.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All saliva samples collected from groups I and II showed growth of <i>S. mutans</i> and <i>C. albicans</i>, respectively. All cultured microbes were sensitive to 0.2% chlorhexidine and 10% propolis extract. The mean inhibition zone for <i>S. mutans</i> with chlorhexidine was 14.57 ± 0.63 mm, and with propolis, 11.93 ± 0.52 mm. The mean zone of inhibition for <i>C. albicans</i> with chlorhexidine was 12.83 ± 0.59 mm, and with propolis, 9.50 ± 0.73 mm. Chlorhexidine consistently showed statistically significantly larger zones of inhibition and hence appeared to be a more potent antimicrobial agent than propolis extract for both <i>S. mutans</i> and <i>C. albicans</i>. However, propolis has irrefutable action against both <i>S. mutans</i> and <i>C. albicans</i>.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Propolis may be an acceptable substitute for chlorhexidine for long-term use as it has demonstrated antimicrobial activity and fewer side effects. Hence, this Association of Physicians of India herbal drug can be incorporated into mouthwashes and toothpaste to reduce microbial counts.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Kodgi V, Shetty P, Thimmaiah C, <i>et al.</i> Comparative Assessment of Antimicrobial Activity of Propolis and Chlorhexidine on Salivary Isolates of <i>Candida albicans</i> and <i>Streptococcus mutans</i> in Children with Severe Early Childhood Caries: An <i>In Vitro</i> Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(5):591-595.</p>","PeriodicalId":36045,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11440659/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2875","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans are the chief microbes associated with severe early childhood caries (S-ECC). Diverse antimicrobial agents are widely used to prevent ECC, and a quest for newer natural products has been on the rise in the recent past.

Aim: To estimate the antimicrobial activity of propolis with chlorhexidine on salivary specimens from children with S-ECC in vitro.

Materials and methods: A total of 60 children with S-ECC were designated. Salivary samples of 30 children (group I) were inoculated onto mitis salivarius agar (MSA) to isolate S. mutans. Another 30 samples (group II) were inoculated on sabouraud's dextrose agar and subcultured on HiCrome Candida differential agar to isolate C. albicans. Sensitivity testing for 0.2% chlorhexidine and 10% propolis extract was done using the agar well diffusion technique using Mueller-Hinton agar medium. The antimicrobial effect was evaluated by calculating the diameter of the zone of inhibition surrounding the well.

Results: All saliva samples collected from groups I and II showed growth of S. mutans and C. albicans, respectively. All cultured microbes were sensitive to 0.2% chlorhexidine and 10% propolis extract. The mean inhibition zone for S. mutans with chlorhexidine was 14.57 ± 0.63 mm, and with propolis, 11.93 ± 0.52 mm. The mean zone of inhibition for C. albicans with chlorhexidine was 12.83 ± 0.59 mm, and with propolis, 9.50 ± 0.73 mm. Chlorhexidine consistently showed statistically significantly larger zones of inhibition and hence appeared to be a more potent antimicrobial agent than propolis extract for both S. mutans and C. albicans. However, propolis has irrefutable action against both S. mutans and C. albicans.

Conclusion: Propolis may be an acceptable substitute for chlorhexidine for long-term use as it has demonstrated antimicrobial activity and fewer side effects. Hence, this Association of Physicians of India herbal drug can be incorporated into mouthwashes and toothpaste to reduce microbial counts.

How to cite this article: Kodgi V, Shetty P, Thimmaiah C, et al. Comparative Assessment of Antimicrobial Activity of Propolis and Chlorhexidine on Salivary Isolates of Candida albicans and Streptococcus mutans in Children with Severe Early Childhood Caries: An In Vitro Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(5):591-595.

蜂胶和洗必泰对严重龋齿儿童唾液中白色念珠菌和变异链球菌分离物抗菌活性的比较评估:体外研究。
背景:变异链球菌和白色念珠菌是与严重儿童早期龋齿(S-ECC)相关的主要微生物。目的:在体外评估蜂胶和洗必泰对 S-ECC 患儿唾液标本的抗菌活性:共指定了60名S-ECC患儿。将 30 名儿童(I 组)的唾液样本接种到唾液腺炎琼脂(MSA)上,以分离出变异杆菌。将另外 30 份样本(第二组)接种到沙保露葡萄糖琼脂上,然后在 HiCrome 念珠菌差异琼脂上进行亚培养,以分离出白念珠菌。使用穆勒-欣顿琼脂培养基,采用琼脂井扩散技术对 0.2% 洗必泰和 10% 蜂胶提取物进行了敏感性测试。抗菌效果通过计算孔周围抑制区的直径来评估:结果:从第一组和第二组收集的所有唾液样本中分别发现了变异杆菌和白喉杆菌的生长。所有培养出的微生物都对 0.2% 洗必泰和 10% 蜂胶提取物敏感。洗必泰对 S. mutans 的平均抑制区为 14.57 ± 0.63 毫米,对蜂胶的平均抑制区为 11.93 ± 0.52 毫米。洗必泰对白僵菌的平均抑制区为 12.83 ± 0.59 毫米,蜂胶为 9.50 ± 0.73 毫米。从统计学角度看,洗必泰的抑菌区明显大于蜂胶提取物的抑菌区,因此,洗必泰似乎是一种比蜂胶提取物对变异杆菌和白僵菌更有效的抗菌剂。然而,蜂胶对突变杆状病毒和白僵菌都有无可辩驳的作用:结论:蜂胶可作为洗必泰的替代品长期使用,因为它具有明显的抗菌活性且副作用较小。因此,印度医师协会可将这种草药加入漱口水和牙膏中,以减少微生物数量:Kodgi V, Shetty P, Thimmaiah C, et al. 蜂胶和洗必泰对严重龋齿儿童唾液中白色念珠菌和变异链球菌的抗菌活性比较评估:体外研究。Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(5):591-595.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
135
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信