Prevalence and Risk Factors for Swallowing Dysfunction in Patients With Laryngomalacia Treated Medically and Surgically.

IF 1.8 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
OTO Open Pub Date : 2024-09-30 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1002/oto2.70025
Janelle Sloychuk, Amy Callaghan, Amanda Adsett, Daniela M Isaac, Hamdy El-Hakim, Andre Isaac
{"title":"Prevalence and Risk Factors for Swallowing Dysfunction in Patients With Laryngomalacia Treated Medically and Surgically.","authors":"Janelle Sloychuk, Amy Callaghan, Amanda Adsett, Daniela M Isaac, Hamdy El-Hakim, Andre Isaac","doi":"10.1002/oto2.70025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify the prevalence, pattern, and nature of swallowing dysfunction (SwD) in a consecutive cohort of patients with laryngomalacia (LM), and to determine factors associated with a higher burden of SwD.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This was a retrospective review of consecutive patients diagnosed with LM by 2 pediatric otolaryngologists between 2013 and 2022 and a minimum of 3-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary care pediatric otolaryngology referral center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive cohort of patients less than 3 years old with LM diagnosed on flexible laryngoscopy were reviewed. Patients with incomplete follow-up, lack of swallowing assessment, and genetic conditions or syndromes were excluded. All patients underwent at minimum a systematic clinical swallowing evaluation by a speech-language pathologist specialized in pediatric dysphagia. Patients with concerning clinical exams underwent instrumental swallow evaluation (Videofluoroscopic Swallow Study [VFSS] or Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing [FEES]). The prevalence of abnormalities of clinical swallowing evaluation, instrumental swallow evaluation data, and details of management were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred and twelve patients met criteria and were included in the final analysis. One hundred and fifteen patients (54%) had an instrumental assessment (VFSS or FEES). Of the instrumental assessments performed, 96 (69%) were abnormal. Of the total patient cohort, 55 (26%) had laryngeal penetration and/or aspiration. One hundred and seventeen (55%) had clinical or instrumental indications for intervention, with 18 (8%) requiring tube feeding. Patients with severe LM and those treated surgically had a statistically significant higher rate of penetration and aspiration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with LM have a high burden of dysphagia requiring medical intervention. The authors advocate for routine and systematic assessment of all patients with LM for swallowing dysfunction.</p>","PeriodicalId":19697,"journal":{"name":"OTO Open","volume":"8 4","pages":"e70025"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11442851/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OTO Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/oto2.70025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To identify the prevalence, pattern, and nature of swallowing dysfunction (SwD) in a consecutive cohort of patients with laryngomalacia (LM), and to determine factors associated with a higher burden of SwD.

Study design: This was a retrospective review of consecutive patients diagnosed with LM by 2 pediatric otolaryngologists between 2013 and 2022 and a minimum of 3-month follow-up.

Setting: Tertiary care pediatric otolaryngology referral center.

Methods: Consecutive cohort of patients less than 3 years old with LM diagnosed on flexible laryngoscopy were reviewed. Patients with incomplete follow-up, lack of swallowing assessment, and genetic conditions or syndromes were excluded. All patients underwent at minimum a systematic clinical swallowing evaluation by a speech-language pathologist specialized in pediatric dysphagia. Patients with concerning clinical exams underwent instrumental swallow evaluation (Videofluoroscopic Swallow Study [VFSS] or Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing [FEES]). The prevalence of abnormalities of clinical swallowing evaluation, instrumental swallow evaluation data, and details of management were collected.

Results: Two hundred and twelve patients met criteria and were included in the final analysis. One hundred and fifteen patients (54%) had an instrumental assessment (VFSS or FEES). Of the instrumental assessments performed, 96 (69%) were abnormal. Of the total patient cohort, 55 (26%) had laryngeal penetration and/or aspiration. One hundred and seventeen (55%) had clinical or instrumental indications for intervention, with 18 (8%) requiring tube feeding. Patients with severe LM and those treated surgically had a statistically significant higher rate of penetration and aspiration.

Conclusion: Patients with LM have a high burden of dysphagia requiring medical intervention. The authors advocate for routine and systematic assessment of all patients with LM for swallowing dysfunction.

接受药物治疗和手术治疗的喉鸣症患者吞咽功能障碍的发生率和风险因素。
目的研究设计:这是一项回顾性研究,研究对象为2013年至2022年期间由两名儿科耳鼻喉科医生诊断为喉头水肿(LM)的连续患者,并进行了至少3个月的随访:这是一项回顾性研究,研究对象是2013年至2022年期间被两名儿科耳鼻喉科医生诊断为喉肌萎缩症的连续患者,并进行了至少3个月的随访:三级儿科耳鼻喉科转诊中心:方法:对柔性喉镜检查确诊为 LM 的 3 岁以下连续队列患者进行回顾性分析。排除了随访不完整、缺乏吞咽评估、遗传条件或综合征的患者。所有患者都至少接受了由儿科吞咽困难专业语言病理学家进行的系统性临床吞咽评估。临床检查有问题的患者需接受仪器吞咽评估(视频荧光吞咽研究(VFSS)或吞咽柔性内窥镜评估(FEES))。收集了临床吞咽评估异常的发生率、仪器吞咽评估数据和处理细节:结果:212 名患者符合标准并纳入最终分析。115 名患者(54%)进行了仪器评估(VFSS 或 FEES)。在进行的仪器评估中,96 例(69%)异常。在所有患者中,55 人(26%)有喉穿透和/或吸入。117例(55%)患者有临床或器械干预指征,其中18例(8%)需要管饲。重度喉癌患者和接受手术治疗的患者发生喉穿通和吸入的比例明显更高:结论:LM 患者吞咽困难的负担很重,需要医疗干预。作者主张对所有 LM 患者进行常规、系统的吞咽功能障碍评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
OTO Open
OTO Open Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
115
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信