A Retrospective Assessment of Guideline Adherence and Treatment Outcomes From Clostridioides difficile Infection Following the IDSA 2021 Clinical Guideline Update: Clostridioides difficile Infection.

IF 3.8 4区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Open Forum Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2024-09-30 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1093/ofid/ofae524
Erik R Dubberke, Qinghua Li, Engels N Obi, Vladimir Turzhitsky, Fakhar Siddiqui, Brian H Nathanson
{"title":"A Retrospective Assessment of Guideline Adherence and Treatment Outcomes From <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> Infection Following the IDSA 2021 Clinical Guideline Update: <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> Infection.","authors":"Erik R Dubberke, Qinghua Li, Engels N Obi, Vladimir Turzhitsky, Fakhar Siddiqui, Brian H Nathanson","doi":"10.1093/ofid/ofae524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The 2021 update to the Infectious Diseases Society of America <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> infection (CDI) guidelines recommended fidaxomicin as the preferred treatment over vancomycin for patients with initial and recurrent CDI. Few studies have examined how treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of hospitalized CDI patients changed after the postguideline update or contemporary real-world outcomes of fidaxomicin vs vancomycin.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, observational study used the PINC AI Healthcare Database on adult patients who received CDI treatment between 1/2020 and 6/2021 (pre period) and between 10/2021 and 9/2022 (post period). We examined treatment patterns of fidaxomicin, vancomycin, and metronidazole, as well as clinical and health care resource use outcomes of patients treated exclusively with fidaxomicin vs vancomycin, using nearest-neighbor propensity matching and hierarchical regression methods. As a sensitivity analysis, we repeated the fidaxomicin vs vancomycin comparisons among patients with recurrent and nonrecurrent index infections.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 45 049 patients with CDI from 779 US hospitals met initial inclusion criteria. Comparing the pre vs post periods, the proportion of patients treated with fidaxomicin increased from 5.9% to 13.7% (<i>P</i> < .001), vancomycin use decreased from 87.9% to 82.9% (<i>P</i> < .001), and metronidazole use decreased from 21.6% to 17.2% (<i>P</i> < .001). When comparing fidaxomicin vs vancomycin in the post period, fidaxomicin was associated with lower CDI recurrence (6.1% vs 10.2%; <i>P</i> < .001) and higher sustained clinical response (91.7% vs 87.8%; <i>P</i> < .001). Ninety-day postdischarge costs were not significantly different between groups. A sensitivity analyses showed similar findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Since the 2021 guideline update, fidaxomicin use has increased significantly but could be further utilized given its association with better clinical outcomes and no increase in postdischarge costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":19517,"journal":{"name":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11443340/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae524","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The 2021 update to the Infectious Diseases Society of America Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) guidelines recommended fidaxomicin as the preferred treatment over vancomycin for patients with initial and recurrent CDI. Few studies have examined how treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of hospitalized CDI patients changed after the postguideline update or contemporary real-world outcomes of fidaxomicin vs vancomycin.

Methods: This retrospective, observational study used the PINC AI Healthcare Database on adult patients who received CDI treatment between 1/2020 and 6/2021 (pre period) and between 10/2021 and 9/2022 (post period). We examined treatment patterns of fidaxomicin, vancomycin, and metronidazole, as well as clinical and health care resource use outcomes of patients treated exclusively with fidaxomicin vs vancomycin, using nearest-neighbor propensity matching and hierarchical regression methods. As a sensitivity analysis, we repeated the fidaxomicin vs vancomycin comparisons among patients with recurrent and nonrecurrent index infections.

Results: A total of 45 049 patients with CDI from 779 US hospitals met initial inclusion criteria. Comparing the pre vs post periods, the proportion of patients treated with fidaxomicin increased from 5.9% to 13.7% (P < .001), vancomycin use decreased from 87.9% to 82.9% (P < .001), and metronidazole use decreased from 21.6% to 17.2% (P < .001). When comparing fidaxomicin vs vancomycin in the post period, fidaxomicin was associated with lower CDI recurrence (6.1% vs 10.2%; P < .001) and higher sustained clinical response (91.7% vs 87.8%; P < .001). Ninety-day postdischarge costs were not significantly different between groups. A sensitivity analyses showed similar findings.

Conclusions: Since the 2021 guideline update, fidaxomicin use has increased significantly but could be further utilized given its association with better clinical outcomes and no increase in postdischarge costs.

国际梭状芽孢杆菌协会 2021 年临床指南更新:艰难梭状芽孢杆菌感染》之后,对指南遵守情况和艰难梭状芽孢杆菌感染治疗结果的回顾性评估。
背景:美国传染病学会2021年更新的艰难梭菌感染(CDI)指南建议,对于初次和复发性CDI患者,首选治疗方法是非达霉素而非万古霉素。很少有研究对指南更新后住院 CDI 患者的治疗模式和临床结果发生了怎样的变化,或菲达霉素与万古霉素的当代实际效果进行了研究:这项回顾性观察研究使用了 PINC AI 医疗保健数据库,研究对象是 2020 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 6 月 6 日(前)和 2021 年 10 月 10 日至 2022 年 9 月 9 日(后)期间接受 CDI 治疗的成年患者。我们使用最近邻倾向匹配和分层回归方法,研究了非达霉素、万古霉素和甲硝唑的治疗模式,以及完全使用非达霉素与万古霉素治疗的患者的临床和医疗资源使用结果。作为一项敏感性分析,我们在复发和非复发指数感染患者中重复了菲达霉素与万古霉素的比较:共有来自美国 779 家医院的 45 049 名 CDI 患者符合初始纳入标准。比较前后时期,使用非达霉素治疗的患者比例从5.9%增至13.7%(P < .001),万古霉素的使用率从87.9%降至82.9%(P < .001),甲硝唑的使用率从21.6%降至17.2%(P < .001)。在出院后将非达霉素与万古霉素进行比较时,非达霉素与较低的CDI复发率(6.1% vs 10.2%;P < .001)和较高的持续临床应答率(91.7% vs 87.8%;P < .001)相关。出院后九十天的费用在各组间无明显差异。敏感性分析显示了相似的结果:自2021年指南更新以来,非达霉素的使用量显著增加,但鉴于其与更好的临床疗效相关,且出院后费用没有增加,因此可以进一步使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Open Forum Infectious Diseases Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
630
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Forum Infectious Diseases provides a global forum for the publication of clinical, translational, and basic research findings in a fully open access, online journal environment. The journal reflects the broad diversity of the field of infectious diseases, and focuses on the intersection of biomedical science and clinical practice, with a particular emphasis on knowledge that holds the potential to improve patient care in populations around the world. Fully peer-reviewed, OFID supports the international community of infectious diseases experts by providing a venue for articles that further the understanding of all aspects of infectious diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信