Is Intraoperative Muscle Motor Evoked Potential Variability due to Fluctuating Lower Motor Neuron Background Excitability?

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Martín J Segura, María E Talarico, Lucas Piantoni, Mariano A Noel, David B MacDonald
{"title":"Is Intraoperative Muscle Motor Evoked Potential Variability due to Fluctuating Lower Motor Neuron Background Excitability?","authors":"Martín J Segura, María E Talarico, Lucas Piantoni, Mariano A Noel, David B MacDonald","doi":"10.1097/WNP.0000000000001118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This pilot study tests the contribution of fluctuating lower motor neuron excitability to motor evoked potential (MEP) variability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In six pediatric patients with idiopathic scoliosis and normal neurologic examination, cascades of 30 intraoperative H-reflexes (HRs) and MEPs were evoked in the soleus muscle using constant-current stimulators and recorded through surface electrodes with a 20-second interstimulus interval. First, HRs were obtained with an intensity capable of evoking the maximum response. Subsequently, MEPs were obtained with double trains and an intensity of 700 to 900 mA. Coefficients of variation (CVs) of amplitude and area under the curve from HRs and MEPs were compared using a paired two-tailed Student t test. Coefficients of correlation between the mean CVs of HR and MEP parameters were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pooling the results from the six patients, the mean CV of amplitude from the MEP (24.6 ± 3) was significantly higher than that from the HR (3.5 ± 4.4) (P = 0.000091). The mean CV of the MEP area under the curve (21.8 ± 4.8) was also statistically significantly higher than that from the HR area under the curve (3.4 ± 4.5) (P = 0.00091). The coefficients of correlation of the mean CV of the HR amplitude and area under the curve compared with the corresponding values of the MEP were low (r = 0.29) and very low (r = 0.03), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results suggest that fluctuations in lower motor neuron excitability may be less important than previously thought to explain the magnitude of MEP variability. The efficacy of corticospinal volleys to recruit a larger and more stable lower motor neuron population would be critical to obtain reproducible MEPs.</p>","PeriodicalId":15516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0000000000001118","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This pilot study tests the contribution of fluctuating lower motor neuron excitability to motor evoked potential (MEP) variability.

Methods: In six pediatric patients with idiopathic scoliosis and normal neurologic examination, cascades of 30 intraoperative H-reflexes (HRs) and MEPs were evoked in the soleus muscle using constant-current stimulators and recorded through surface electrodes with a 20-second interstimulus interval. First, HRs were obtained with an intensity capable of evoking the maximum response. Subsequently, MEPs were obtained with double trains and an intensity of 700 to 900 mA. Coefficients of variation (CVs) of amplitude and area under the curve from HRs and MEPs were compared using a paired two-tailed Student t test. Coefficients of correlation between the mean CVs of HR and MEP parameters were also assessed.

Results: Pooling the results from the six patients, the mean CV of amplitude from the MEP (24.6 ± 3) was significantly higher than that from the HR (3.5 ± 4.4) (P = 0.000091). The mean CV of the MEP area under the curve (21.8 ± 4.8) was also statistically significantly higher than that from the HR area under the curve (3.4 ± 4.5) (P = 0.00091). The coefficients of correlation of the mean CV of the HR amplitude and area under the curve compared with the corresponding values of the MEP were low (r = 0.29) and very low (r = 0.03), respectively.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that fluctuations in lower motor neuron excitability may be less important than previously thought to explain the magnitude of MEP variability. The efficacy of corticospinal volleys to recruit a larger and more stable lower motor neuron population would be critical to obtain reproducible MEPs.

术中肌肉运动诱发电位变异性是下运动神经元背景兴奋性波动所致吗?
目的:本试验性研究测试了下运动神经元兴奋性波动对运动诱发电位(MEP)变异性的贡献:方法:在六名特发性脊柱侧弯且神经系统检查正常的儿科患者中,使用恒流刺激器在比目鱼肌上诱发一连串 30 次术中 H 反射(HR)和 MEP,并通过表面电极记录,刺激间隔为 20 秒。首先,以能够唤起最大反应的强度获得心率。随后,用双列和 700 至 900 毫安的强度获得 MEPs。采用配对双尾学生 t 检验比较心率和 MEPs 的振幅和曲线下面积的变异系数 (CV)。此外,还评估了心率和 MEP 参数平均变异系数之间的相关性:结果:汇总六名患者的结果,MEP 振幅的平均 CV(24.6 ± 3)明显高于 HR 振幅的平均 CV(3.5 ± 4.4)(P = 0.000091)。MEP 曲线下面积的平均变异系数(21.8 ± 4.8)也明显高于心率曲线下面积的平均变异系数(3.4 ± 4.5)(P = 0.00091)。心率振幅和曲线下面积的平均 CV 与 MEP 相应值的相关系数分别较低(r = 0.29)和很低(r = 0.03):我们的研究结果表明,下运动神经元兴奋性的波动在解释 MEP 变异性的大小方面可能没有以前认为的那么重要。皮质脊髓波动招募更大和更稳定的下运动神经元群对获得可重现的 MEP 至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology
Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.20%
发文量
198
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology features both topical reviews and original research in both central and peripheral neurophysiology, as related to patient evaluation and treatment. Official Journal of the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信