Bullous Pemphigoid Severity and Levels of Antibodies to BP180 and BP230: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 11.5 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY
Po-Yi Chou, Chia-Ling Yu, Chiao-Ni Wen, Yu-Kang Tu, Ching-Chi Chi
{"title":"Bullous Pemphigoid Severity and Levels of Antibodies to BP180 and BP230: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Po-Yi Chou, Chia-Ling Yu, Chiao-Ni Wen, Yu-Kang Tu, Ching-Chi Chi","doi":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.3425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>The correlation between serum levels of autoantibodies against bullous pemphigoid (BP) antigens 180 (BP180) and 230 (BP230) with BP disease severity is unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the correlation of anti-BP180 and anti-BP230 immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody levels with BP disease severity.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A search was performed of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, and PubMed databases from their respective inception to April 11, 2024.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Studies evaluating the correlation between serum levels of anti-BP180 or anti-BP230 IgG measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and disease severity assessed per the Autoimmune Bullous Skin Disorder Intensity Score (ABSIS) or BP Disease Area Index (BPDAI) were included. No language or geographic restrictions were imposed. Nearly 0.4% of initially identified studies met the selection criteria.</p><p><strong>Data extraction and synthesis: </strong>One researcher extracted data and another researcher confirmed data. The risk of bias was independently assessed by these researchers using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool, with discrepancies resolved by discussion with a third researcher. A random-effects model meta-analysis and a subgroup analysis were conducted based on the ELISA kit manufacturers.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Pooled correlation coefficients of antibody levels with ABSIS and BPDAI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In all, 14 studies with 1226 participants were analyzed. The risk of bias of included studies was generally low. The meta-analysis found anti-BP180 autoantibody levels showed moderate correlation with objective BPDAI (r = 0.56; 95% CI, 0.46-0.64) at baseline, strong correlation (r = 0.63; 95% CI, 0.39-0.79) at 3-month follow-up, and moderate correlation (r = 0.53; 95% CI, 0.25-0.72) at 6-month follow-up. Anti-BP180 autoantibody levels also showed moderate correlation (r = 0.52; 95% CI, 0.39-0.62) with ABSIS at baseline, strong correlation (r = 0.62; 95% CI, 0.39-0.79) at 3-month follow-up, and moderate correlation (r = 0.53; 95% CI, 0.25-0.72) at 6-month follow-up. By contrast, anti-BP230 autoantibody levels showed no association with objective BPDAI and ABSIS at diagnosis and follow-up. The subgroup analysis found similar results when using different ELISA kits.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>The findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis indicated that anti-BP180 autoantibody levels may serve as an adjunctive tool for monitoring BP disease severity and guiding clinical care for patients with BP.</p>","PeriodicalId":14734,"journal":{"name":"JAMA dermatology","volume":" ","pages":"1192-1200"},"PeriodicalIF":11.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11447634/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.3425","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: The correlation between serum levels of autoantibodies against bullous pemphigoid (BP) antigens 180 (BP180) and 230 (BP230) with BP disease severity is unclear.

Objective: To investigate the correlation of anti-BP180 and anti-BP230 immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody levels with BP disease severity.

Data sources: A search was performed of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, and PubMed databases from their respective inception to April 11, 2024.

Study selection: Studies evaluating the correlation between serum levels of anti-BP180 or anti-BP230 IgG measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and disease severity assessed per the Autoimmune Bullous Skin Disorder Intensity Score (ABSIS) or BP Disease Area Index (BPDAI) were included. No language or geographic restrictions were imposed. Nearly 0.4% of initially identified studies met the selection criteria.

Data extraction and synthesis: One researcher extracted data and another researcher confirmed data. The risk of bias was independently assessed by these researchers using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool, with discrepancies resolved by discussion with a third researcher. A random-effects model meta-analysis and a subgroup analysis were conducted based on the ELISA kit manufacturers.

Main outcomes and measures: Pooled correlation coefficients of antibody levels with ABSIS and BPDAI.

Results: In all, 14 studies with 1226 participants were analyzed. The risk of bias of included studies was generally low. The meta-analysis found anti-BP180 autoantibody levels showed moderate correlation with objective BPDAI (r = 0.56; 95% CI, 0.46-0.64) at baseline, strong correlation (r = 0.63; 95% CI, 0.39-0.79) at 3-month follow-up, and moderate correlation (r = 0.53; 95% CI, 0.25-0.72) at 6-month follow-up. Anti-BP180 autoantibody levels also showed moderate correlation (r = 0.52; 95% CI, 0.39-0.62) with ABSIS at baseline, strong correlation (r = 0.62; 95% CI, 0.39-0.79) at 3-month follow-up, and moderate correlation (r = 0.53; 95% CI, 0.25-0.72) at 6-month follow-up. By contrast, anti-BP230 autoantibody levels showed no association with objective BPDAI and ABSIS at diagnosis and follow-up. The subgroup analysis found similar results when using different ELISA kits.

Conclusions and relevance: The findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis indicated that anti-BP180 autoantibody levels may serve as an adjunctive tool for monitoring BP disease severity and guiding clinical care for patients with BP.

大疱性类天疱疮的严重程度与 BP180 和 BP230 的抗体水平:系统回顾与元分析》。
重要性:针对大疱性类天疱疮(BP)抗原180(BP180)和230(BP230)的血清自身抗体水平与BP疾病严重程度之间的相关性尚不明确:研究抗 BP180 和抗 BP230 免疫球蛋白 G (IgG) 抗体水平与 BP 疾病严重程度的相关性:研究选择:研究筛选:纳入了评估使用酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)测定的血清抗 BP180 或抗 BP230 IgG 水平与根据自身免疫性大疱性皮肤病强度评分(ABSIS)或 BP 疾病面积指数(BPDAI)评估的疾病严重程度之间相关性的研究。没有语言或地域限制。在初步确定的研究中,近 0.4% 的研究符合筛选标准:一名研究人员提取数据,另一名研究人员确认数据。偏倚风险由这些研究人员使用诊断准确性研究质量评估 2 工具进行独立评估,不一致之处由第三位研究人员讨论解决。根据ELISA试剂盒生产商进行了随机效应模型荟萃分析和亚组分析:抗体水平与 ABSIS 和 BPDAI 的汇总相关系数:结果:共分析了14项研究,1226名参与者。纳入研究的偏倚风险普遍较低。荟萃分析发现,抗 BP180 自身抗体水平与客观 BPDAI 在基线时呈中度相关(r = 0.56;95% CI,0.46-0.64),在 3 个月随访时呈强相关(r = 0.63;95% CI,0.39-0.79),在 6 个月随访时呈中度相关(r = 0.53;95% CI,0.25-0.72)。抗 BP180 自身抗体水平在基线时与 ABSIS 也呈中度相关(r = 0.52;95% CI,0.39-0.62),随访 3 个月时呈强相关(r = 0.62;95% CI,0.39-0.79),随访 6 个月时呈中度相关(r = 0.53;95% CI,0.25-0.72)。相比之下,抗 BP230 自身抗体水平与诊断和随访时的客观 BPDAI 和 ABSIS 没有关联。亚组分析发现,使用不同的酶联免疫吸附试剂盒得出的结果相似:本系统综述和荟萃分析的结果表明,抗 BP180 自身抗体水平可作为监测 BP 疾病严重程度和指导 BP 患者临床治疗的辅助工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA dermatology
JAMA dermatology DERMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
5.50%
发文量
300
期刊介绍: JAMA Dermatology is an international peer-reviewed journal that has been in continuous publication since 1882. It began publication by the American Medical Association in 1920 as Archives of Dermatology and Syphilology. The journal publishes material that helps in the development and testing of the effectiveness of diagnosis and treatment in medical and surgical dermatology, pediatric and geriatric dermatology, and oncologic and aesthetic dermatologic surgery. JAMA Dermatology is a member of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications. It is published online weekly, every Wednesday, and in 12 print/online issues a year. The mission of the journal is to elevate the art and science of health and diseases of skin, hair, nails, and mucous membranes, and their treatment, with the aim of enabling dermatologists to deliver evidence-based, high-value medical and surgical dermatologic care. The journal publishes a broad range of innovative studies and trials that shift research and clinical practice paradigms, expand the understanding of the burden of dermatologic diseases and key outcomes, improve the practice of dermatology, and ensure equitable care to all patients. It also features research and opinion examining ethical, moral, socioeconomic, educational, and political issues relevant to dermatologists, aiming to enable ongoing improvement to the workforce, scope of practice, and the training of future dermatologists. JAMA Dermatology aims to be a leader in developing initiatives to improve diversity, equity, and inclusion within the specialty and within dermatology medical publishing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信