How global spine sagittal alignment and spinal degeneration affect locomotive syndrome risk in the elderly.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Irish Journal of Medical Science Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1007/s11845-024-03813-3
Ramada R Khasawneh, Ejlal Abu-El-Rub, Rawan A Almazari, Ayman G Mustafa
{"title":"How global spine sagittal alignment and spinal degeneration affect locomotive syndrome risk in the elderly.","authors":"Ramada R Khasawneh, Ejlal Abu-El-Rub, Rawan A Almazari, Ayman G Mustafa","doi":"10.1007/s11845-024-03813-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to delineate the features of the locomotive syndrome (LS) risk stage in the elderly population, encompassing global spine sagittal alignment, visible spinal degenerative changes on plain radiographs, muscle strength, physical capabilities, and low back pain (LBP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study enrolled 232 subjects, evaluated using plain radiographs. The evaluation included measurements of lumbar lordosis (LLA), thoracic kyphosis (TKA), spinal inclination (SIA) angles, and sagittal vertical axis. Assessments included lumbar osteophyte formation (LOF) and lumbar disc height (LDH) to examine spinal degenerative changes. LS evaluation used the locomotive syndrome risk test based on LS risk criteria, classifying participants into no risk, stage 1 LS, and stage 2 LS groups. Using a visual analogue scale (VAS), we investigated the prevalence of low back pain (LBP) and assessed physical performances across these groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 132 participants with no LS risk, 71 with stage 1 LS risk, and 29 with stage 2 LS risk. As LS risk increased, LBP prevalence and VAS scores rose, physical abilities, and back muscle strength decreased. TKA showed no variation across groups, while LLA decreased with advancing LS risk stage. Except for L1-L2 and L5-S1, lumbar disc height (LDH) decreased with higher LS risk stages. LOF occurrence increased notably with higher LS risk stages. Spinal inclination angle (SIA) significantly increased with advancing LS risk stages.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Participants diagnosed with LS exhibited an increased incidence of spinal degeneration, reduced LLA, and global spinal imbalance characterized by anterior spinal inclination.</p>","PeriodicalId":14507,"journal":{"name":"Irish Journal of Medical Science","volume":" ","pages":"3007-3013"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11666610/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Journal of Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-024-03813-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to delineate the features of the locomotive syndrome (LS) risk stage in the elderly population, encompassing global spine sagittal alignment, visible spinal degenerative changes on plain radiographs, muscle strength, physical capabilities, and low back pain (LBP).

Methods: The study enrolled 232 subjects, evaluated using plain radiographs. The evaluation included measurements of lumbar lordosis (LLA), thoracic kyphosis (TKA), spinal inclination (SIA) angles, and sagittal vertical axis. Assessments included lumbar osteophyte formation (LOF) and lumbar disc height (LDH) to examine spinal degenerative changes. LS evaluation used the locomotive syndrome risk test based on LS risk criteria, classifying participants into no risk, stage 1 LS, and stage 2 LS groups. Using a visual analogue scale (VAS), we investigated the prevalence of low back pain (LBP) and assessed physical performances across these groups.

Results: There were 132 participants with no LS risk, 71 with stage 1 LS risk, and 29 with stage 2 LS risk. As LS risk increased, LBP prevalence and VAS scores rose, physical abilities, and back muscle strength decreased. TKA showed no variation across groups, while LLA decreased with advancing LS risk stage. Except for L1-L2 and L5-S1, lumbar disc height (LDH) decreased with higher LS risk stages. LOF occurrence increased notably with higher LS risk stages. Spinal inclination angle (SIA) significantly increased with advancing LS risk stages.

Conclusion: Participants diagnosed with LS exhibited an increased incidence of spinal degeneration, reduced LLA, and global spinal imbalance characterized by anterior spinal inclination.

整体脊柱矢状排列和脊柱退化如何影响老年人运动综合征的风险。
背景:本研究旨在界定老年人群中运动综合征(LS)风险阶段的特征,包括整体脊柱矢状排列、平片上可见的脊柱退行性病变、肌肉力量、体能和腰背痛(LBP):该研究招募了 232 名受试者,使用普通 X 光片进行评估。评估包括腰椎前凸(LLA)、胸椎后凸(TKA)、脊柱倾斜(SIA)角和矢状垂直轴的测量。评估包括腰椎骨质增生(LOF)和腰椎间盘高度(LDH),以检查脊柱退行性变化。LS评估采用基于LS风险标准的运动综合征风险测试,将参与者分为无风险组、LS第一阶段组和LS第二阶段组。我们使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)调查了腰背痛(LBP)的患病率,并评估了这些组别的体能表现:结果:132 名参与者无腰背痛风险,71 名参与者有 1 期腰背痛风险,29 名参与者有 2 期腰背痛风险。随着LS风险的增加,LBP患病率和VAS评分上升,体能和背部肌肉力量下降。TKA在各组之间没有差异,而LLA则随着LS风险阶段的增加而减少。除L1-L2和L5-S1外,腰椎间盘高度(LDH)随着LS风险阶段的升高而降低。LOF发生率随着LS风险分期的升高而明显增加。脊柱倾斜角(SIA)随着LS风险分期的增加而明显增加:结论:被诊断为LS的患者脊柱退行性变的发生率增加,LLA降低,脊柱整体失衡,表现为脊柱前倾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Irish Journal of Medical Science
Irish Journal of Medical Science 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
357
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Irish Journal of Medical Science is the official organ of the Royal Academy of Medicine in Ireland. Established in 1832, this quarterly journal is a contribution to medical science and an ideal forum for the younger medical/scientific professional to enter world literature and an ideal launching platform now, as in the past, for many a young research worker. The primary role of both the Academy and IJMS is that of providing a forum for the exchange of scientific information and to promote academic discussion, so essential to scientific progress.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信