Risk of metachronous colorectal cancer associated with polypectomy during endoscopic diagnosis of colorectal cancer.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
James Giulian Fiori, Steven Kim, Marina Helen Wallace, Samantha Rankin, Oyekoya Taiwo Ayonrinde
{"title":"Risk of metachronous colorectal cancer associated with polypectomy during endoscopic diagnosis of colorectal cancer.","authors":"James Giulian Fiori, Steven Kim, Marina Helen Wallace, Samantha Rankin, Oyekoya Taiwo Ayonrinde","doi":"10.1007/s00384-024-04722-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>There are conflicting reports regarding the risk of metachronous colorectal cancer (CRC) subsequent to colonoscopy with polypectomy or biopsy performed concurrently with diagnostic biopsies for CRC. We aimed to establish the 5-year risk of CRC in patients who had synchronous polypectomy or biopsies during the colonoscopy at which CRC was diagnosed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a single-centre retrospective case-control study of adults who underwent surgical resection for CRC over a 2-year period (January 2016 to December 2017). Colonoscopy details of interest were the location of the CRC, polypectomy and non-CRC biopsy sites. In patients with CRC at index colonoscopy, we sought associations between the occurrence of metachronous CRC and the sites from which endoscopic specimens had been obtained.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study population comprised 225 patients with a median (IQR) age of 71 (60-77) years. Polypectomy or biopsy at a non-CRC site had been performed during the index colonoscopy in 108 patients (48%), including 83 (37%) polypectomies outside the surgical resection field. There were 8 (3.6%) metachronous CRCs: 1 (0.4%) at the site of endoscopic mucosal resection for a 15-mm sessile serrated lesion, 3 (1.3%) anastomotic site CRCs and 4 (1.8%) at other sites within the colon. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of metachronous CRC in patients who underwent polypectomy/biopsy at the index colonoscopy compared with those who did not (1.9% vs. 5.1%, p = 0.283).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was no significant increased risk of metachronous CRC subsequent to synchronous polypectomy or biopsy during the colonoscopy at which CRC was diagnosed.</p>","PeriodicalId":13789,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Colorectal Disease","volume":"39 1","pages":"155"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11447038/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Colorectal Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-024-04722-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aim: There are conflicting reports regarding the risk of metachronous colorectal cancer (CRC) subsequent to colonoscopy with polypectomy or biopsy performed concurrently with diagnostic biopsies for CRC. We aimed to establish the 5-year risk of CRC in patients who had synchronous polypectomy or biopsies during the colonoscopy at which CRC was diagnosed.

Methods: This is a single-centre retrospective case-control study of adults who underwent surgical resection for CRC over a 2-year period (January 2016 to December 2017). Colonoscopy details of interest were the location of the CRC, polypectomy and non-CRC biopsy sites. In patients with CRC at index colonoscopy, we sought associations between the occurrence of metachronous CRC and the sites from which endoscopic specimens had been obtained.

Results: Our study population comprised 225 patients with a median (IQR) age of 71 (60-77) years. Polypectomy or biopsy at a non-CRC site had been performed during the index colonoscopy in 108 patients (48%), including 83 (37%) polypectomies outside the surgical resection field. There were 8 (3.6%) metachronous CRCs: 1 (0.4%) at the site of endoscopic mucosal resection for a 15-mm sessile serrated lesion, 3 (1.3%) anastomotic site CRCs and 4 (1.8%) at other sites within the colon. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of metachronous CRC in patients who underwent polypectomy/biopsy at the index colonoscopy compared with those who did not (1.9% vs. 5.1%, p = 0.283).

Conclusion: There was no significant increased risk of metachronous CRC subsequent to synchronous polypectomy or biopsy during the colonoscopy at which CRC was diagnosed.

在内窥镜诊断结直肠癌过程中进行息肉切除术有可能导致并发结直肠癌。
背景和目的:关于在进行结肠镜检查的同时进行息肉切除术或活检以诊断 CRC 的报道相互矛盾,因为在进行结肠镜检查的同时进行息肉切除术或活检以诊断 CRC 的报道相互矛盾,因为在进行结肠镜检查的同时进行息肉切除术或活检以诊断 CRC 的报道相互矛盾。我们的目的是确定在诊断出 CRC 的结肠镜检查期间同步进行息肉切除术或活检的患者 5 年内罹患 CRC 的风险:这是一项单中心回顾性病例对照研究,研究对象为两年内(2016 年 1 月至 2017 年 12 月)因 CRC 而接受手术切除的成年人。研究人员关注的结肠镜检查细节包括 CRC 的位置、息肉切除术和非 CRC 活检部位。对于在索引结肠镜检查中发现有 CRC 的患者,我们试图找出远期 CRC 的发生与内镜标本获取部位之间的关联:我们的研究对象包括 225 名患者,中位(IQR)年龄为 71(60-77)岁。108名患者(48%)在进行索引结肠镜检查时在非CRC部位进行了息肉切除术或活检,其中包括83例(37%)在手术切除范围外进行的息肉切除术。共有 8 例(3.6%)非同步性 CRC:1 例(0.4%)发生在因 15 毫米无柄锯齿状病变而进行内镜粘膜切除的部位,3 例(1.3%)发生在吻合口部位的 CRC,4 例(1.8%)发生在结肠内的其他部位。在结肠镜检查中接受息肉切除/活检的患者与未接受息肉切除/活检的患者相比,并无明显差异(1.9% vs. 5.1%,P = 0.283):结论:在诊断出 CRC 的结肠镜检查中进行同步息肉切除术或活检后,并不会明显增加并发 CRC 的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.60%
发文量
206
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Colorectal Disease, Clinical and Molecular Gastroenterology and Surgery aims to publish novel and state-of-the-art papers which deal with the physiology and pathophysiology of diseases involving the entire gastrointestinal tract. In addition to original research articles, the following categories will be included: reviews (usually commissioned but may also be submitted), case reports, letters to the editor, and protocols on clinical studies. The journal offers its readers an interdisciplinary forum for clinical science and molecular research related to gastrointestinal disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信