Belimumab 10 years later: how drug positioning has changed.

IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Immunologic Research Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-02 DOI:10.1007/s12026-024-09543-z
Fulvia Ceccarelli, Francesco Natalucci, Claudia Ciancarella, Licia Picciariello, Valeria Moretti, Francesca Romana Spinelli, Cristiano Alessandri, Fabrizio Conti
{"title":"Belimumab 10 years later: how drug positioning has changed.","authors":"Fulvia Ceccarelli, Francesco Natalucci, Claudia Ciancarella, Licia Picciariello, Valeria Moretti, Francesca Romana Spinelli, Cristiano Alessandri, Fabrizio Conti","doi":"10.1007/s12026-024-09543-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We analysed the change in the positioning of belimumab (BLM) in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) treatment in the first decade of real-life use, by providing data about patients treated by this biological drug in the Sapienza Lupus Cohort. We evaluated SLE patients treated by BLM according to the current clinical practice. Data of each patient were collected, focusing on previous and concomitant treatments. Finally, the drug retention rate was assessed. Since August 2013, 138 SLE patients started BLM (M/F 7/131; median age 49 years, IQR 13.25; median disease duration 214 months, IQR 180). To evaluate the change in BLM positioning, we divided patients according to the date of starting treatment as below: patients treated from 2013 to 2018 (period 1) and those treated since 2019 to date (period 2). Indeed, the median number of previous immunosuppressant drugs was significantly higher in patients treated in period 1 [3 (IQR 1.25) versus 1 (IQR 1.75), p = 0.0002]. Furthermore, 15.9% of patients treated in period 2 were not previously treated by immunosuppressant drugs, compared with 5.2% in period 1 (p = 0.01). Finally, the 24-month drug survival was significantly higher in patients previously treated with ≤ 1 immunosuppressant drug in comparison with those treated with ≥ 2 drugs (69.1% versus 43.4%, p = 0.0097, HR 0.49; 95% CI 0.27-0.88). Our data clearly described the progressive anticipation of BLM prescription in the first 10 years of clinical practice, underlining as choosing earlier biological agents could positively influence the drug retention rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":13389,"journal":{"name":"Immunologic Research","volume":" ","pages":"1441-1446"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11618203/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Immunologic Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12026-024-09543-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We analysed the change in the positioning of belimumab (BLM) in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) treatment in the first decade of real-life use, by providing data about patients treated by this biological drug in the Sapienza Lupus Cohort. We evaluated SLE patients treated by BLM according to the current clinical practice. Data of each patient were collected, focusing on previous and concomitant treatments. Finally, the drug retention rate was assessed. Since August 2013, 138 SLE patients started BLM (M/F 7/131; median age 49 years, IQR 13.25; median disease duration 214 months, IQR 180). To evaluate the change in BLM positioning, we divided patients according to the date of starting treatment as below: patients treated from 2013 to 2018 (period 1) and those treated since 2019 to date (period 2). Indeed, the median number of previous immunosuppressant drugs was significantly higher in patients treated in period 1 [3 (IQR 1.25) versus 1 (IQR 1.75), p = 0.0002]. Furthermore, 15.9% of patients treated in period 2 were not previously treated by immunosuppressant drugs, compared with 5.2% in period 1 (p = 0.01). Finally, the 24-month drug survival was significantly higher in patients previously treated with ≤ 1 immunosuppressant drug in comparison with those treated with ≥ 2 drugs (69.1% versus 43.4%, p = 0.0097, HR 0.49; 95% CI 0.27-0.88). Our data clearly described the progressive anticipation of BLM prescription in the first 10 years of clinical practice, underlining as choosing earlier biological agents could positively influence the drug retention rate.

贝利木单抗十年之后:药物定位的变化。
我们分析了贝利木单抗(Belimumab,BLM)在系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)治疗中的定位在实际使用的第一个十年中发生的变化,提供了萨皮恩扎狼疮队列中接受这种生物药物治疗的患者的数据。我们根据目前的临床实践对接受 BLM 治疗的系统性红斑狼疮患者进行了评估。我们收集了每位患者的数据,重点是既往治疗和伴随治疗。最后,对药物保留率进行了评估。自2013年8月起,138名系统性红斑狼疮患者开始接受BLM治疗(男/女7/131;中位年龄49岁,IQR 13.25;中位病程214个月,IQR 180)。为了评估 BLM 定位的变化,我们根据开始治疗的日期将患者划分如下:2013年至2018年接受治疗的患者(第一阶段)和2019年至今接受治疗的患者(第二阶段)。事实上,在第 1 期接受治疗的患者中,既往使用过免疫抑制剂药物的中位数明显更高[3(IQR 1.25)对 1(IQR 1.75),p = 0.0002]。此外,在第二阶段接受治疗的患者中,15.9%的患者之前未接受过免疫抑制剂治疗,而在第一阶段接受治疗的患者中,这一比例为 5.2%(P = 0.01)。最后,既往接受过≤1种免疫抑制剂治疗的患者的24个月药物存活率明显高于接受过≥2种药物治疗的患者(69.1%对43.4%,P = 0.0097,HR 0.49;95% CI 0.27-0.88)。我们的数据清楚地描述了在临床实践的前 10 年中,对 BLM 处方的逐步预期,强调了较早选择生物制剂会对药物保留率产生积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Immunologic Research
Immunologic Research 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: IMMUNOLOGIC RESEARCH represents a unique medium for the presentation, interpretation, and clarification of complex scientific data. Information is presented in the form of interpretive synthesis reviews, original research articles, symposia, editorials, and theoretical essays. The scope of coverage extends to cellular immunology, immunogenetics, molecular and structural immunology, immunoregulation and autoimmunity, immunopathology, tumor immunology, host defense and microbial immunity, including viral immunology, immunohematology, mucosal immunity, complement, transplantation immunology, clinical immunology, neuroimmunology, immunoendocrinology, immunotoxicology, translational immunology, and history of immunology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信