Seismic vulnerability assessment of a railway beam bridge considering brittle failure of the restrainer in a friction pendulum system

Quanchuang Yuan, Weitao Yin, Kailai Deng, Hao Lu, Lin Pang, Xingchen Chen
{"title":"Seismic vulnerability assessment of a railway beam bridge considering brittle failure of the restrainer in a friction pendulum system","authors":"Quanchuang Yuan,&nbsp;Weitao Yin,&nbsp;Kailai Deng,&nbsp;Hao Lu,&nbsp;Lin Pang,&nbsp;Xingchen Chen","doi":"10.1002/eer2.91","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The restrainers in the friction pendulum system (FPS) may experience brittle failure during an earthquake. Strong nonlinear behavior should be considered to precisely assess the seismic performance of the railway beam bridge under an earthquake. A seismic vulnerability assessment was performed based on a typical simply supported railway beam bridge. Three different models of the FPS in fixed direction were considered: elastic restrainer model, brittle restrainer model, and nonrestrainer model. Through dynamic analysis, the responses of the railway beam bridge were obtained, including the force and displacement of the FPSs, the curvature ductility at the pier bottom, and transverse dislocation at the beam gap. The analysis results pointed out when the earthquake intensity exceeded the fundamental intensity, the brittle failure of the restrainers was very likely to happen. The sudden release of energy introduced a displacement pulse to the FPS. The elastic restrainer model overestimated the force demand and damage probability of the substructures but underestimated the FPS displacement and dislocation at the beam gap. The nonrestrainer model seriously underestimated the force demand of the substructure and the FPS displacement under strong earthquakes. The brittle restrainer model could reflect the nonuniform failure of the restrainers and provide a more accurate estimate of the transverse dislocation at the beam gap.</p>","PeriodicalId":100383,"journal":{"name":"Earthquake Engineering and Resilience","volume":"3 3","pages":"432-446"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eer2.91","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earthquake Engineering and Resilience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eer2.91","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The restrainers in the friction pendulum system (FPS) may experience brittle failure during an earthquake. Strong nonlinear behavior should be considered to precisely assess the seismic performance of the railway beam bridge under an earthquake. A seismic vulnerability assessment was performed based on a typical simply supported railway beam bridge. Three different models of the FPS in fixed direction were considered: elastic restrainer model, brittle restrainer model, and nonrestrainer model. Through dynamic analysis, the responses of the railway beam bridge were obtained, including the force and displacement of the FPSs, the curvature ductility at the pier bottom, and transverse dislocation at the beam gap. The analysis results pointed out when the earthquake intensity exceeded the fundamental intensity, the brittle failure of the restrainers was very likely to happen. The sudden release of energy introduced a displacement pulse to the FPS. The elastic restrainer model overestimated the force demand and damage probability of the substructures but underestimated the FPS displacement and dislocation at the beam gap. The nonrestrainer model seriously underestimated the force demand of the substructure and the FPS displacement under strong earthquakes. The brittle restrainer model could reflect the nonuniform failure of the restrainers and provide a more accurate estimate of the transverse dislocation at the beam gap.

考虑摩擦摆系统中约束装置的脆性破坏的铁路梁桥地震脆弱性评估
摩擦摆系统(FPS)中的约束装置在地震中可能会发生脆性破坏。为精确评估铁路梁桥在地震中的抗震性能,应考虑强烈的非线性行为。基于典型的简支铁路梁桥进行了地震脆弱性评估。在固定方向上考虑了三种不同的 FPS 模型:弹性约束模型、脆性约束模型和非约束模型。通过动态分析,获得了铁路梁桥的响应,包括 FPS 的力和位移、墩底的曲率延性和梁间隙的横向位错。分析结果表明,当地震烈度超过基本烈度时,约束装置极易发生脆性破坏。能量的突然释放给 FPS 带来了位移脉冲。弹性约束装置模型高估了下部结构的受力需求和破坏概率,但低估了 FPS 在梁间隙处的位移和错位。非约束模型严重低估了强震下下部结构的受力需求和 FPS 位移。脆性约束装置模型可以反映约束装置的非均匀破坏,并能更准确地估计梁间隙处的横向位移。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信