Belief rule learning and reasoning for classification based on fuzzy belief decision tree

IF 3.2 3区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
{"title":"Belief rule learning and reasoning for classification based on fuzzy belief decision tree","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijar.2024.109300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The belief rules which extend the classical fuzzy IF-THEN rules with belief consequent parts have been widely used for classifier design due to their capabilities of building linguistic models interpretable to users and addressing various types of uncertainty. However, in the rule learning process, a high number of features generally results in a belief rule base with large size, which degrades both the classification accuracy and the model interpretability. Motivated by this challenge, the decision tree building technique which implements feature selection and model construction jointly is introduced in this paper to learn a compact and accurate belief rule base. To this end, a new fuzzy belief decision tree (FBDT) with fuzzy feature partitions and belief leaf nodes is designed: a fuzzy information gain ratio is first defined as the feature selection criterion for node fuzzy splitting and then the belief distributions are introduced to the leaf nodes to characterize the class uncertainty. Based on the initial rules extracted from the constructed FBDT, a joint optimization objective considering both classification accuracy and model interpretability is then designed to further reduce the rule redundancy. Experimental results based on real datasets show that the proposed FBDT-based classification method has much smaller rule base and better interpretability than other rule-based methods on the premise of competitive accuracy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13842,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Approximate Reasoning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Approximate Reasoning","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0888613X24001877","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The belief rules which extend the classical fuzzy IF-THEN rules with belief consequent parts have been widely used for classifier design due to their capabilities of building linguistic models interpretable to users and addressing various types of uncertainty. However, in the rule learning process, a high number of features generally results in a belief rule base with large size, which degrades both the classification accuracy and the model interpretability. Motivated by this challenge, the decision tree building technique which implements feature selection and model construction jointly is introduced in this paper to learn a compact and accurate belief rule base. To this end, a new fuzzy belief decision tree (FBDT) with fuzzy feature partitions and belief leaf nodes is designed: a fuzzy information gain ratio is first defined as the feature selection criterion for node fuzzy splitting and then the belief distributions are introduced to the leaf nodes to characterize the class uncertainty. Based on the initial rules extracted from the constructed FBDT, a joint optimization objective considering both classification accuracy and model interpretability is then designed to further reduce the rule redundancy. Experimental results based on real datasets show that the proposed FBDT-based classification method has much smaller rule base and better interpretability than other rule-based methods on the premise of competitive accuracy.
基于模糊信念决策树的信念规则学习与分类推理
信念规则是对经典模糊 IF-THEN 规则的扩展,具有信念后果部分,因其能够建立用户可解释的语言模型,并能解决各种类型的不确定性,已被广泛用于分类器设计。然而,在规则学习过程中,大量特征通常会导致信念规则库规模庞大,从而降低分类精度和模型可解释性。受此挑战的启发,本文引入了决策树构建技术,将特征选择和模型构建结合起来,以学习一个紧凑而精确的信念规则库。为此,本文设计了一种具有模糊特征分区和信念叶节点的新型模糊信念决策树(FBDT):首先定义一个模糊信息增益比作为节点模糊分区的特征选择标准,然后在叶节点中引入信念分布来表征类的不确定性。根据从构建的 FBDT 中提取的初始规则,设计一个同时考虑分类准确性和模型可解释性的联合优化目标,以进一步减少规则冗余。基于真实数据集的实验结果表明,与其他基于规则的方法相比,基于 FBDT 的分类方法在具有竞争力的准确率前提下,规则库更小,可解释性更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Approximate Reasoning
International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
12.80%
发文量
170
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Approximate Reasoning is intended to serve as a forum for the treatment of imprecision and uncertainty in Artificial and Computational Intelligence, covering both the foundations of uncertainty theories, and the design of intelligent systems for scientific and engineering applications. It publishes high-quality research papers describing theoretical developments or innovative applications, as well as review articles on topics of general interest. Relevant topics include, but are not limited to, probabilistic reasoning and Bayesian networks, imprecise probabilities, random sets, belief functions (Dempster-Shafer theory), possibility theory, fuzzy sets, rough sets, decision theory, non-additive measures and integrals, qualitative reasoning about uncertainty, comparative probability orderings, game-theoretic probability, default reasoning, nonstandard logics, argumentation systems, inconsistency tolerant reasoning, elicitation techniques, philosophical foundations and psychological models of uncertain reasoning. Domains of application for uncertain reasoning systems include risk analysis and assessment, information retrieval and database design, information fusion, machine learning, data and web mining, computer vision, image and signal processing, intelligent data analysis, statistics, multi-agent systems, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信