C.V. Sise , C.A. Petersen , J. Yun , S. Vukelic , C.T. Hung , G.A. Ateshian
{"title":"Synovial fluid does not retard fluid exudation during stress-relaxation of immature bovine cartilage","authors":"C.V. Sise , C.A. Petersen , J. Yun , S. Vukelic , C.T. Hung , G.A. Ateshian","doi":"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Interstitial fluid load support (FLS) is a dominant mechanism of lubrication in cartilage, producing a low friction coefficient while enhancing the tissue’s load bearing capabilities. Due to its viscosity, synovial fluid (SF) may retard loss of FLS by slowing the exudation of interstitial fluid from the cartilage. This study tested this hypothesis by comparing the stress-relaxation (SRL) response of immature bovine articular cartilage immersed either in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) or in healthy mature bovine SF, under unconfined compression (fluid exudation across cut lateral tissue boundary) and indentation testing (fluid exudation across articular surface). To investigate the influence of diffusion of SF molecular constituents into cartilage, the effect of incubation time in SF on SRL was also investigated. The SRL response in unconfined compression was not significantly different in PBS versus SF when compared directly (p = 0.98) and had a slope of<span><math><mrow><mi>m</mi></mrow></math></span> = 1.00 ± 0.04 (<span><math><mrow><msup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mn>2</mn></msup></mrow></math></span> = 0.989 ± 0.007). Samples tested in PBS exhibited characteristic relaxation times, <span><math><mrow><msup><mrow><mi>τ</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>PBS</mi></mrow></msup></mrow></math></span>=42.6 ± 5.3 s and<span><math><mrow><msup><mrow><mi>τ</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>SF</mi></mrow></msup></mrow></math></span> = 40.8 ± 4.7 s, that were not significantly different (p = 0.40). Incubation time of 24 h in SF resulted in no significant difference in the SRL response (p = 0.39, <span><math><mrow><mi>m</mi></mrow></math></span>=1.03 ± 0.12; <span><math><mrow><msup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mn>2</mn></msup></mrow></math></span>=0.983 ± 0.011, and<span><math><mrow><msup><mrow><mi>τ</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>PBS</mi></mrow></msup></mrow></math></span> = 43.4 ± 10.7 s versus<span><math><mrow><msup><mrow><mi>τ</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>SF</mi></mrow></msup></mrow></math></span> = 41.5 ± 4.8 s, p = 0.59). Indentation testing showed some statistically significant, but functionally insignificant, difference in SRL responses in PBS versus SF with a slope of<span><math><mrow><mi>m</mi></mrow></math></span> = 0.958 ± 0.060 (<span><math><mrow><msup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mn>2</mn></msup></mrow></math></span> = 0.957 ± 0.020, p = 0.029, and<span><math><mrow><msup><mrow><mi>τ</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>PBS</mi></mrow></msup></mrow></math></span> = 16.9 ± 2.6 s versus<span><math><mrow><msup><mrow><mi>τ</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>SF</mi></mrow></msup></mrow></math></span> = 19.4 ± 3.3 s, p = 0.073). Based on these results, we reject the hypothesis that healthy SF can retard the loss of FLS in cartilage due to its viscosity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomechanics","volume":"176 ","pages":"Article 112340"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929024004184","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Interstitial fluid load support (FLS) is a dominant mechanism of lubrication in cartilage, producing a low friction coefficient while enhancing the tissue’s load bearing capabilities. Due to its viscosity, synovial fluid (SF) may retard loss of FLS by slowing the exudation of interstitial fluid from the cartilage. This study tested this hypothesis by comparing the stress-relaxation (SRL) response of immature bovine articular cartilage immersed either in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) or in healthy mature bovine SF, under unconfined compression (fluid exudation across cut lateral tissue boundary) and indentation testing (fluid exudation across articular surface). To investigate the influence of diffusion of SF molecular constituents into cartilage, the effect of incubation time in SF on SRL was also investigated. The SRL response in unconfined compression was not significantly different in PBS versus SF when compared directly (p = 0.98) and had a slope of = 1.00 ± 0.04 ( = 0.989 ± 0.007). Samples tested in PBS exhibited characteristic relaxation times, =42.6 ± 5.3 s and = 40.8 ± 4.7 s, that were not significantly different (p = 0.40). Incubation time of 24 h in SF resulted in no significant difference in the SRL response (p = 0.39, =1.03 ± 0.12; =0.983 ± 0.011, and = 43.4 ± 10.7 s versus = 41.5 ± 4.8 s, p = 0.59). Indentation testing showed some statistically significant, but functionally insignificant, difference in SRL responses in PBS versus SF with a slope of = 0.958 ± 0.060 ( = 0.957 ± 0.020, p = 0.029, and = 16.9 ± 2.6 s versus = 19.4 ± 3.3 s, p = 0.073). Based on these results, we reject the hypothesis that healthy SF can retard the loss of FLS in cartilage due to its viscosity.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Biomechanics publishes reports of original and substantial findings using the principles of mechanics to explore biological problems. Analytical, as well as experimental papers may be submitted, and the journal accepts original articles, surveys and perspective articles (usually by Editorial invitation only), book reviews and letters to the Editor. The criteria for acceptance of manuscripts include excellence, novelty, significance, clarity, conciseness and interest to the readership.
Papers published in the journal may cover a wide range of topics in biomechanics, including, but not limited to:
-Fundamental Topics - Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems, mechanics of hard and soft tissues, biofluid mechanics, mechanics of prostheses and implant-tissue interfaces, mechanics of cells.
-Cardiovascular and Respiratory Biomechanics - Mechanics of blood-flow, air-flow, mechanics of the soft tissues, flow-tissue or flow-prosthesis interactions.
-Cell Biomechanics - Biomechanic analyses of cells, membranes and sub-cellular structures; the relationship of the mechanical environment to cell and tissue response.
-Dental Biomechanics - Design and analysis of dental tissues and prostheses, mechanics of chewing.
-Functional Tissue Engineering - The role of biomechanical factors in engineered tissue replacements and regenerative medicine.
-Injury Biomechanics - Mechanics of impact and trauma, dynamics of man-machine interaction.
-Molecular Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of biomolecules.
-Orthopedic Biomechanics - Mechanics of fracture and fracture fixation, mechanics of implants and implant fixation, mechanics of bones and joints, wear of natural and artificial joints.
-Rehabilitation Biomechanics - Analyses of gait, mechanics of prosthetics and orthotics.
-Sports Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of sports performance.