Building back greener, levelling-up or both? An assessment of the economic and environmental efficiency transition of UK regions

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Giorgio Fazio , Sara Maioli , Nirat Rujimora
{"title":"Building back greener, levelling-up or both? An assessment of the economic and environmental efficiency transition of UK regions","authors":"Giorgio Fazio ,&nbsp;Sara Maioli ,&nbsp;Nirat Rujimora","doi":"10.1016/j.pirs.2024.100053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper assesses the transition of UK regions towards the policy ambitions of “building back greener” and “levelling-up” the UK economy. We use data envelopment analysis (DEA) methods to calculate regional economic and environmental efficiency for 41 UK ITL2 regions between 2005 and 2020, and then assess their “unconditional” and “spatial” transition probabilities of improving one of the two efficiencies or both. We find evidence of a trade-off between the two for more than half of the regions and that the costs of transition are unequally distributed. We also find that regions are more likely to become efficient in both directions if they are already environmentally efficient; less economically efficient regions are more likely to become economically efficient than environmentally efficient. Economic efficiency improvements are easier to achieve than environmental efficiency improvements, requiring stronger policy support for the latter. The high inertia of regions requires central and local authorities’ intervention to reduce regional inequalities and improve both types of efficiency. Whilst we do not find evidence of spatial spillovers for environmental transitions, space (negatively) matters for regional economic efficiency. Without a combination of place-based and national policies, there is no natural regional convergence nor levelling up, whilst the transition to net zero will remain too slow.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1056819024000733","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper assesses the transition of UK regions towards the policy ambitions of “building back greener” and “levelling-up” the UK economy. We use data envelopment analysis (DEA) methods to calculate regional economic and environmental efficiency for 41 UK ITL2 regions between 2005 and 2020, and then assess their “unconditional” and “spatial” transition probabilities of improving one of the two efficiencies or both. We find evidence of a trade-off between the two for more than half of the regions and that the costs of transition are unequally distributed. We also find that regions are more likely to become efficient in both directions if they are already environmentally efficient; less economically efficient regions are more likely to become economically efficient than environmentally efficient. Economic efficiency improvements are easier to achieve than environmental efficiency improvements, requiring stronger policy support for the latter. The high inertia of regions requires central and local authorities’ intervention to reduce regional inequalities and improve both types of efficiency. Whilst we do not find evidence of spatial spillovers for environmental transitions, space (negatively) matters for regional economic efficiency. Without a combination of place-based and national policies, there is no natural regional convergence nor levelling up, whilst the transition to net zero will remain too slow.
重新建设更环保的城市、提高城市水平还是两者兼而有之?英国各地区经济和环境效率转型评估
本文评估了英国各地区向 "重建绿色 "和 "提升英国经济水平 "的政策目标过渡的情况。我们使用数据包络分析(DEA)方法计算了英国 41 个 ITL2 地区在 2005 至 2020 年间的地区经济和环境效率,然后评估了这些地区提高两种效率中的一种或同时提高两种效率的 "无条件 "和 "空间 "过渡概率。我们发现有证据表明,一半以上的地区在这两种效率之间存在权衡,而且过渡成本分布不均。我们还发现,如果地区已经具有环境效率,则更有可能在两个方向上都提高效率;经济效率较低的地区更有可能提高经济效率,而不是环境效率。经济效率的提高比环境效率的提高更容易实现,后者需要更有力的政策支持。地区的高度惰性要求中央和地方当局进行干预,以减少地区不平等并提高两种效率。虽然我们没有发现环境转型的空间溢出效应,但空间(负面)对区域经济效率很重要。如果不将基于地方的政策与国家政策结合起来,就不会出现自然的区域趋同或均衡化,而向净零过渡的速度将依然过于缓慢。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信