{"title":"Flow in ChatGPT-based logic learning and its influences on logic and self-efficacy in English argumentative writing","authors":"Ruofei Zhang , Di Zou , Gary Cheng , Haoran Xie","doi":"10.1016/j.chb.2024.108457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Flow is a state of full engagement in an activity. Learning environments featured by Skill-challenge balance, Clear goal, Feedback, and Playability — collectively known as flow antecedents – can induce flow experiences and improve learning outcomes. ChatGPT-based environment seems to encourage a flow in learners: By customising tasks to match students' abilities, aligning materials with clear objectives, providing instant feedback, and ensuring ease of use, ChatGPT can help learners enter a flow state, which, in turn, leads to improved learning. However, there hasn't been much research on flow in ChatGPT-based learning. To bridge the gap, we developed a ChatGPT-based environment for developing logic in English argumentative writing. We studied 40 Chinese university English-as-a-foreign-language (EFL) students in the learning using questionnaires, eye-tracking data, knowledge tests, essay writing tasks, and semi-structured interviews to understand how they experienced flow and how it affected their learning. Our findings showed that the ChatGPT-based environment strongly supports flow antecedents. Skill-challenge balance and Playability were particularly influential for inducing flow experiences. Students who experienced a deeper flow showed better understanding of argumentative writing logic, although their writing self-efficacy became lower. Drawing from the findings, our study highlights how AI like ChatGPT can influence experiences and outcomes of logic learning and language learning, which may be applicable across various domains and disciplines.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48471,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior","volume":"162 ","pages":"Article 108457"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S074756322400325X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Flow is a state of full engagement in an activity. Learning environments featured by Skill-challenge balance, Clear goal, Feedback, and Playability — collectively known as flow antecedents – can induce flow experiences and improve learning outcomes. ChatGPT-based environment seems to encourage a flow in learners: By customising tasks to match students' abilities, aligning materials with clear objectives, providing instant feedback, and ensuring ease of use, ChatGPT can help learners enter a flow state, which, in turn, leads to improved learning. However, there hasn't been much research on flow in ChatGPT-based learning. To bridge the gap, we developed a ChatGPT-based environment for developing logic in English argumentative writing. We studied 40 Chinese university English-as-a-foreign-language (EFL) students in the learning using questionnaires, eye-tracking data, knowledge tests, essay writing tasks, and semi-structured interviews to understand how they experienced flow and how it affected their learning. Our findings showed that the ChatGPT-based environment strongly supports flow antecedents. Skill-challenge balance and Playability were particularly influential for inducing flow experiences. Students who experienced a deeper flow showed better understanding of argumentative writing logic, although their writing self-efficacy became lower. Drawing from the findings, our study highlights how AI like ChatGPT can influence experiences and outcomes of logic learning and language learning, which may be applicable across various domains and disciplines.
期刊介绍:
Computers in Human Behavior is a scholarly journal that explores the psychological aspects of computer use. It covers original theoretical works, research reports, literature reviews, and software and book reviews. The journal examines both the use of computers in psychology, psychiatry, and related fields, and the psychological impact of computer use on individuals, groups, and society. Articles discuss topics such as professional practice, training, research, human development, learning, cognition, personality, and social interactions. It focuses on human interactions with computers, considering the computer as a medium through which human behaviors are shaped and expressed. Professionals interested in the psychological aspects of computer use will find this journal valuable, even with limited knowledge of computers.