Comparative analysis of hybrid geothermal-solar systems and solar PV with battery storage: Site suitability, emissions, and economic performance

IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Halil Ibrahim Fedakar , Ali Ersin Dinçer , Abdullah Demir
{"title":"Comparative analysis of hybrid geothermal-solar systems and solar PV with battery storage: Site suitability, emissions, and economic performance","authors":"Halil Ibrahim Fedakar ,&nbsp;Ali Ersin Dinçer ,&nbsp;Abdullah Demir","doi":"10.1016/j.geothermics.2024.103175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Renewable energy integration has become a critical focus in the global effort to reduce carbon emissions and diversify energy sources. In regions with distinct geographic features, such as Türkiye, combining different renewable technologies can offer enhanced energy security. This study investigates the site suitability and economic and environmental performance of hybrid geothermal-solar systems and solar PV systems with battery storage across the provinces of Osmaniye, Hatay, and Kilis, of Türkiye. Using the fuzzy-AHP method, site suitability is evaluated, addressing a key gap in comparing these systems' adaptability to varying geographic conditions. This study is the first to directly compare these two renewable energy technologies in terms of site suitability. The findings reveal significant differences in site suitability, with solar PV systems with battery storage demonstrating broader applicability across the region. The suitable sites (20–100 % suitability) cover 1260.82 km² for solar PV systems with battery storage and only 122.18 km² for hybrid geothermal-solar systems. In terms of environmental impact, hybrid geothermal-solar systems exhibit significantly lower carbon emissions, averaging 44.6 kg CO₂/MWh, compared to 123.8 kg CO₂/MWh for solar PV systems with battery storage. Economically, hybrid geothermal-solar systems also outperform with a lower levelized cost of electricity of $0.091 kWh versus $0.254 kWh for solar PV systems. These results highlight the environmental and economic advantages of hybrid geothermal-solar systems, while also emphasizing their limited scalability to regions with geothermal activity. Conversely, solar PV systems, despite their higher emissions and costs, offer greater flexibility and potential for widespread deployment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55095,"journal":{"name":"Geothermics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geothermics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037565052400261X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Renewable energy integration has become a critical focus in the global effort to reduce carbon emissions and diversify energy sources. In regions with distinct geographic features, such as Türkiye, combining different renewable technologies can offer enhanced energy security. This study investigates the site suitability and economic and environmental performance of hybrid geothermal-solar systems and solar PV systems with battery storage across the provinces of Osmaniye, Hatay, and Kilis, of Türkiye. Using the fuzzy-AHP method, site suitability is evaluated, addressing a key gap in comparing these systems' adaptability to varying geographic conditions. This study is the first to directly compare these two renewable energy technologies in terms of site suitability. The findings reveal significant differences in site suitability, with solar PV systems with battery storage demonstrating broader applicability across the region. The suitable sites (20–100 % suitability) cover 1260.82 km² for solar PV systems with battery storage and only 122.18 km² for hybrid geothermal-solar systems. In terms of environmental impact, hybrid geothermal-solar systems exhibit significantly lower carbon emissions, averaging 44.6 kg CO₂/MWh, compared to 123.8 kg CO₂/MWh for solar PV systems with battery storage. Economically, hybrid geothermal-solar systems also outperform with a lower levelized cost of electricity of $0.091 kWh versus $0.254 kWh for solar PV systems. These results highlight the environmental and economic advantages of hybrid geothermal-solar systems, while also emphasizing their limited scalability to regions with geothermal activity. Conversely, solar PV systems, despite their higher emissions and costs, offer greater flexibility and potential for widespread deployment.
地热-太阳能混合系统与带电池储能的太阳能光伏发电系统的比较分析:场地适用性、排放和经济效益
可再生能源一体化已成为全球努力减少碳排放和实现能源多样化的关键重点。在图尔基耶等地理特征明显的地区,将不同的可再生能源技术结合起来,可以提高能源安全。本研究调查了图尔基耶省奥斯曼尼耶、哈塔伊和基利斯的地热-太阳能混合系统和带电池储能的太阳能光伏系统的选址适宜性、经济和环境性能。利用模糊-AHP 方法对场地适宜性进行了评估,解决了在比较这些系统对不同地理条件的适应性方面存在的关键差距。这项研究首次直接比较了这两种可再生能源技术的场地适宜性。研究结果表明,场地适宜性存在显著差异,带蓄电池的太阳能光伏系统在整个地区具有更广泛的适用性。带蓄电池的太阳能光伏系统的适用场地(20%-100% 适用性)为 1260.82 平方公里,而混合地热-太阳能系统的适用场地仅为 122.18 平方公里。在环境影响方面,混合地热-太阳能系统的碳排放量明显较低,平均为 44.6 千克 CO₂/兆瓦时,而带蓄电池的太阳能光伏系统的碳排放量为 123.8 千克 CO₂/兆瓦时。在经济上,地热-太阳能混合系统也更胜一筹,其平准化电力成本为 0.091 美元/千瓦时,而太阳能光伏系统为 0.254 美元/千瓦时。这些结果凸显了地热-太阳能混合系统在环境和经济方面的优势,同时也强调了其在地热活动地区的可扩展性有限。相反,太阳能光伏发电系统尽管排放量和成本较高,但却具有更大的灵活性和广泛部署的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geothermics
Geothermics 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
15.40%
发文量
237
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Geothermics is an international journal devoted to the research and development of geothermal energy. The International Board of Editors of Geothermics, which comprises specialists in the various aspects of geothermal resources, exploration and development, guarantees the balanced, comprehensive view of scientific and technological developments in this promising energy field. It promulgates the state of the art and science of geothermal energy, its exploration and exploitation through a regular exchange of information from all parts of the world. The journal publishes articles dealing with the theory, exploration techniques and all aspects of the utilization of geothermal resources. Geothermics serves as the scientific house, or exchange medium, through which the growing community of geothermal specialists can provide and receive information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信